Anderson Mountain
Project ID: 6922
Status: Current
Fiscal Year: 2025
Submitted By: N/A
Project Manager: Jeremy Cox
PM Agency: Bureau of Land Management
PM Office: Cedar City
Lead: Bureau of Land Management
WRI Region: Southern
Description:
Treat a approximately of 1800 acres with a lop and scatter treatment to be completed 2025. Issue a agreement for approximately 2500 acres of archeological clearance to be completed 2025. This project will restore and enhance summer substantial and winter crucial habitat for mule deer, and it is possible the proposed treatment will increase useable habitat for sage grouse. The area contains all phases of pinyon-juniper encroachment, but the majority is Phase 2.
Location:
The project area is located approximately 10 miles south of Beaver, Utah and East of I-15. The project will incorporate lands in both Iron and Beaver counties.
Project Need
Need For Project:
The project area is located adjacent to the 2020 Sage Flat Mastication project area and has been identified as an important landscape to preserve and restore sagebrush habitat for priority species. This project will help to remove the threat pinyon pine and juniper is causing on crucial sagebrush habitat and benefit the species that rely on it for survival The project area falls between 2 greater sage grouse priority habitat management areas (PHMA), and is within sage grouse summer, winter and breeding habitat. The proposed treatment is expected to increase the usable habitat for sage-grouse and to make it a good travel stop during seasonal movements. Data collected from collared grouse shows bird movement between the Bald hills and Panguitch PHMA's. Removing trees in this area will help provide connectivity between the two populations. The area in and around the project site has been identified as being critically important mule deer habitat and has been identified in the Statewide Mule Deer Management Plan as being a "priority for restoration of crucial mule deer habitat" (Utah Statewide Mule Deer Management Plan, 2019), and falls within summer substantial and winter crucial mule deer habitat. The project area also provides important hunting opportunities locally and for people traveling from out of state to hunt on the Beaver unit for mule deer. These highly sought-after hunting opportunities within the project area provide a financial boost to local economies through food, gas, and other supply purchases, hiring local guides and outfitters, and hiring local taxidermists and meat processors. After the completion of the 2020 Sage Flat Mastication project that is very close in proximity to this one. We seen lots of elk move into the area during the rut and stayed throughout the winter. We anticipate that this treatment will create additional high quality habitat and forage for further expansion of the elk using the adjacent treatment. Areas that become dominated by pinyon pine and juniper trees out compete understory herbaceous species and leave bare soil prone to erosion. This herbaceous vegetation is important to reducing overland flow and reducing soil loss. By completing this project this will allow more precipitation to contact the soil and get into the water table. Because pinyon and juniper is very competitive for water this often reduces grasses and forbs within the area. Increased runoff and sediment load, decreases water yield and water quality within the watershed.
Objectives:
Objectives: The project area falls between 2 greater sage grouse priority habitat management areas (PHMA), and is expected to expand greater sage-grouse habitat. In addition to increasing habitat for greater sage grouse, the project area falls within an area that has been identified as summer substantial, winter crucial mule deer habitat and is in a known migration corridor. In order to address the ongoing threat that pinyon pine and juniper poses to the critical sagebrush habitats, the following objectives are proposed: Objective 1- Reduce pinyon pine and juniper density by 90-100% Objective 2-Create and maintain adequate habitat components to meet the needs of greater sage-grouse in nesting, brood-rearing, and winter habitats in accordance with current land use planning guidelines and in coordination with UDWR and SWARM. Objective 3- Increase available forage and habitat utilization for mule deer. Objective 4- Increase under-story plant diversity and cover (e.g., Forbs, grasses, and shrubs). Objective 5- Increase available water by removing pinyon pine and juniper trees. Objective 6- Decrease potential soil loss and erosion by increasing under-story vegetation. Objective 7- Reduce risk of destructive fires in the area by reducing pinyon pine and juniper stand density.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
There is a risk of not treating pinyon pine and juniper in the near future that will result in negative ecological consequences. Lack of natural disturbances such as wildfire have favored pinyon pine and juniper expansion and a subsequent decline in herbaceous vegetation, It is expected that if the project does not occur pinyon pine and juniper expansion will continue to occur in the project area further limiting potential sage grouse habitat. This project will increase and maintain the availability of a diverse suite of vegetational communities which will help support a robust wildlife population. A healthy landscape has a diversity of vegetation within an ecological site. A diverse landscape benefits a larger community of wildlife species (e.g.,. sage grouse and mule deer). A diverse landscape is also more resistant and resilient to disturbance. By allowing this landscape to continue to move further into a dominant pinyon pine and juniper woodland it increases the risk of losing the sites ability for resistance to disturbance and its resilience to bounce back and and recover after a disturbance. The risk of invasion of cheatgrass after a wildfire could further impact sage grouse and mule deer in the area. The potential for weed invasion with this proactive project is low considering past projects of this type, however, the area will be monitored for invasive species and will be treated if invasive weeds are found. As previously mentioned the area has been identified as priority for restoration of CRUCIAL mule deer habitat under the Statewide Mule Deer Management Plan. "Crucial" means the areas habitat is necessary to sustain the areas mule deer herd. Allowing the area to remain in phase 2 and 3 pinyon pine and juniper encroachment will mean less quality habitat to meet mule deer objectives.
Relation To Management Plan:
This project falls under the South Beaver Vegetation Enhancement EA and the Chipman Peak Vegetation Enhancement EA and both have identified areas that need vegetation treatments for habitat improvement for a variety of wildlife species and watershed health. BLM Utah Greater Sage-Grouse Approved Resource Management Plan 2019. The project is consistent with the SGARMPA (2015) goals, objectives and Management Actions that were identified in the Special Status Species section as follows: Special Status Species Goal: Maintain and/or increase GRSG abundance and distribution by conserving, enhancing or restoring the sagebrush ecosystem upon which populations depend in collaboration with other conservation partners. The Conservation Plan for Greater Sage-grouse in Utah was approved by the Governor in 2019. The plan established incentive-based conservation programs for conservation of sage-grouse on private, local government, and School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration lands and regulatory programs on other state and federally managed lands. The Conservation Plan also establishes sage-grouse management areas and implements specific management protocols in these areas. The Utah Greater Sage-grouse Management Plan in 2019 identified threats and issues affecting sage-grouse management in Utah as well as goals, objectives, and strategies intended to guide UDWR, local working groups, and land managers efforts to protect, maintain, and improve sage-grouse populations and habitats and balance their management with other resource uses. Southwest Desert Local Working Group Conservation Plan 2009. The local Working Group has developed a Conservation Plan detailing the natural history, threats, and mitigation measures for sage-grouse in each conservation plan area; and conservation guidelines for any activities occurring in the area. The Utah State Wildlife Action Plan 2015-2025 (Draft) is a comprehensive management plan designed to conserve native species populations and habitats in Utah and prevent the need for additional federal listings. Utah Statewide Mule Deer Management Plan *Initiate broad scale vegetative treatment projects to improve mule deer habitat with emphasis on drought or fire damaged sagebrush winter ranges, ranges that have been taken over by invasive annual grass species, and ranges being diminished by encroachment of conifers into sagebrush or aspen habitats, ensuring that seed mixes contain sufficient forbs and browse species. *Work with local, state and federal land management agencies via land management plans and with private landowners to identify and properly manage crucial mule deer habitats, especially fawning, wintering and migration areas. Beaver Mountains Deer Herd Unit #22 Management Plan *Cooperate with federal land management agencies and private landowners in carrying out habitat improvement projects. Protect deer winter ranges from wildfire by reseeding burned areas, creating fuel breaks and reseed areas dominated by cheatgrass with desirable perennial vegetation. *Reduce expansion of Pinion and Juniper woodlands into sagebrush habitats and improve habitats dominated by Pinion and Juniper woodlands by completing habitat restoration projects. *Work with federal and state partners in fire rehabilitation and prevention on crucial deer habitat through the WRI process.
Fire / Fuels:
The project is located within the Buckskin - Dog Valley FMU, and the majority of the area is at moderate to high on the fire risk index. The Fire Regime condition Class (FRCC) within the Project Area is classified as FRCC 2 and 3 (lands that are significantly altered from their historical range. This project would help return the area to the desired FRCC of 1 and 2. Wildfire is one of the greatest threats to sage grouse habitat. This project will help protect and preserve sagebrush habitat by decreasing both fuel loading and fire potential. There have been large fires within the immediate vicinity of the project area so loss of more sagebrush steppe in the area would be very detrimental. This project will decrease the risk of high severity wildfire by reducing fuel loading and promoting the growth of understory vegetation, which are critical to maintaining ecosystem resilience. Without this project, the trees will continue to expand into the area and should a fire occur, it would be more difficult to control and would have much more devastating effects by burning at a higher intensity and getting larger. Because there is a greater risk of conversion of shrublands to annual grasslands under a high intensity fire, managed, pro-active treatments proposed would reduce the likelihood of cheatgrass invasion and help perennial grasses and forbs persist longer-term. Treatments identified within this proposal, including seeding with more fire resistant vegetation, would help reduce hazardous fuel loads, create fuel breaks, and reduce the overall threat of a catastrophic wildfire which could impact the watershed, sage grouse and mule deer habitat as well as high value infrastructure such as Interstate 15, and communication towers that serve the surrounding communities in Beaver county.
Water Quality/Quantity:
The Project Area is located at 6,000 - 7,300 feet above sea level; therefore, it is expected that the opportunity to restore native species to the composition and frequency appropriate to the area is high. As discussed, the majority of the area is dominated by pinyon pine and juniper (Phase 2 and Phase 3). There is noticeable soil erosion throughout the area due to the absence of perennial grasses, forbs and shrubs. The project is expected to improve herbaceous understory, which will reduce water runoff and decrease soil erosion while increasing infiltration. Because juniper are prolific water users they readily out compete understory species which eventually die off. Pinyon pine and juniper dominated sites can intercept 10-20% of precipitation (Horman et al., 1999). Recent research Roundy, et. al. (2014) has shown that mechanical treatments to remove pinyon pine and juniper increase time that soil water is available. Even four years after treatment, treated areas showed from 8.6 days to 18 days additional water availability at high elevation sites. Additional research by Young, et. al. (2013) also showed a relationship between tree removal and soil climates and wet days on these sites, which while providing more available moisture for desired vegetation could also provide moisture for weeds. Numerous studies have shown that increased infiltration rates and less overland flow improve both water quality and quantity In addition, improvements to the Standards and Guidelines for Healthy Rangelands (Standard 1 and Standard 3) are expected through project implementation. It is expected that Standard 1 (Soils) -- will improve by allowing soils to exhibit permeability and infiltration rates that will sustain/improve site productivity throughout the area. This will be accomplished by making improvements to the Biotic Integrity of the community by converting areas that are dominated by pinyon pine and juniper to a diverse component of perennial grasses, forbs and shrubs that is consistent with Ecological Site Description. Indicators will include sufficient cover and litter to protect the soil surface from excessive water and wind erosion, limiting surface flow and limiting soil moisture loss through evaporation, which will promote proper infiltration.
Compliance:
The NEPA/Final Decision documents have been completed for the project area. The treatment would be rested from livestock grazing for a minimum of two years following project implementation to ensure adequate rest and seedling establishment. A cultural inventory for the project will be contracted prior to project implementation. Sites will be avoided where required and incorporated into the mosaic design of the project where possible.
Methods:
The proposed project consists of Archeologically clearly polygons for 2025 fiscal year which will then be mechanically treated the following year (2026), and lop and scatter portion completed in 2025. The project has a healthy seed source of sagebrush, bitterbrush and native grasses and forbs adjacent to and within the project site, and it is expected that by removing the pinion pine and juniper, that these species will be able to expand and reestablish throughout the project area. Corridors and islands of trees will be left for wildlife throughout the area.
Monitoring:
There are numerous photopoints established for the project for before and after pictures. BLM has recently initiated a new Assessment, Inventory and Monitoring program (AIM) to improve the effectiveness of monitoring on BLM lands. This monitoring program uses standard core indicators and methods to provide a statistically valid sampling design across the landscape. This year, the Cedar City Field office will have an entire team devoted to AIM monitoring, and although the sample points are random, it is likely that some of these points will fall within the project area. Additionally, this project is adjacent to sage grouse summer, winter and breeding habitat. Habitat Assessment Framework monitoring is a multiscale, sage-grouse habitat assessment tool that can be integrated with the AIM. This monitoring is done from a broad-to-fine scale. The dataset at the site scale (which includes this project) describes habitat indicators, such as sagebrush cover, sagebrush height, grass and forb cover, riparian stability, and/or proximity of detrimental land uses and structures. These data will ensure appropriate project implementation, as well as guide future actions in sage grouse habitat. The area will also continue to be monitored to determine where and how sage grouse are using the area.
Partners:
Utah State University Extension, NRCS, DWR, US Fish and Wildlife Service, SWARM, and Livestock Permittees. BLM has continually attended the SWARM meeting to update partners on current treatment progress as well as new treatments that are being proposed within the area. The BLM also coordinated with DWR, UPDOG, SWARM, USU extension, UPDRIT etc... during the NEPA process when treatments within the project area were being considered for authorization. The IIC has been integral to the success of pre and post vegetative and wildlife monitoring throughout earlier phases of the project, which is expected to continue. Livestock permittees within the project area have been coordinated with to ensure that the areas that are treated will be rested for a minimum of two years.
Future Management:
If needed, maintenance will be done in the future to maintain our investment. All areas seeded would be rested for a minimum of two complete growing seasons or until the seedings become established. Invasive weeds will also be monitored and treated on an as needed basis.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
Rangeland conditions are expected to improve following implementation of the proposed vegetation project. The health, vigor, recruitment and production of perennial grasses, forbs and shrubs would improve, which would provide a more palatable and nutritional source of forage for both livestock and wildlife. Implementation of this project would eventually improve overall livestock performance (e.g. increased cow weights, increased calf crops, increased weaning weights, etc) and improve the economic stability of the permittees due to an increase in the quantity and quality of grasses and other herbaceous forage which are important to livestock grazing. The lop and scatter treatment would increase available forage but more importantly prevent future loss of forage. The bullhog will provide a significat increase in available forage once seeding is established and help with cattle distribution in the future. The project area also provides important recreational hunting for the local population and people travel from all over Utah (and from other states) to hunt on the Beaver unit for mule deer. The highly sought after hunting opportunities within the project area provide a financial boost to local economies in several ways. Continuing to do work to maintain the habitat in this area will help to perpetuate the recreational and economic benefits.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$846,700.00 $5,000.00 $851,700.00 $25,000.00 $876,700.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Archaeological Clearance Survey on BLM lands 2500 acres @ 65$ $162,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Contractual Services Lop adn Scatter on BLM lands 1800 acres @ 380 $684,200.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Other Cadastral Survey $0.00 $5,000.00 $0.00 2025
Other Noxious weed survey and control measures $0.00 $0.00 $5,000.00 2025
Other BLM employee planning and coordination of project $0.00 $0.00 $20,000.00 2025
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$846,607.91 $5,000.00 $851,607.91 $25,000.00 $876,607.91
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
BLM Fuels (Color Country) $0.00 $5,000.00 $25,000.00 2025
BLM Fuels (Color Country) A206 Mod 1 ASAP 189, 190 $816,607.91 $0.00 $0.00 2025
BLM BIL - Fuels A216 Mod 1 ASAP 191 $30,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Domestic Livestock
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Very High
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Upland High
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Upland High
Habitats
Habitat
Lowland Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Very High
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Mountain Shrub
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Low
Project Comments
Comment 01/29/2024 Type: 1 Commenter: Lindsay Martindale
Hi Jeremy, In the water quality/quantity section, you mention the Ecological Site Description, but I didn't see the document attached. Could you attach the ESD to the proposal? Thank you.
Comment 01/29/2024 Type: 1 Commenter: Jeremy Cox
Sorry I forgot to attach the document its attached now. Thanks
Comment 01/31/2024 Type: 1 Commenter: Jacob Benson
Hello Jeremy, I am wondering if there is any possiblity in reducing some of the lop & scatter and implement some mastication on the thicker stands of Pinyon & Juniper? As I drive up & down I-15 I am very familiar with the area. I feel there is some potential for chain or bullhogg in some polygons. Also is there an avenue to secure some NRCS funding through the permittee? Thanks
Comment 01/31/2024 Type: 1 Commenter: Jeremy Cox
Jake, We are planning on masticating all the areas roughly 1,500 acres that we are able to get bullhogs into which will be Arc cleared this year but not masticated until the following year 2024/2025. Due to grazing rotation issues we had to hold off on the mastication part. The lop and scatter is focusing on the areas we cannot get a bullhog into that still has decent understory and good soils and that will be done fall of 2024. This project will tie the 2020 sage flat mastication that is upon top of the bench all the way down to the lower benches and the sagebrush flats. The map section should show the two distinctions of the proposal. I'll be talking with Stan about NRCS funding as we move forward with the mastication phase. I just noticed that map was labeled wrong and shows everything as hand thin, I'll have that fixed to show the correct designations.
Comment 02/05/2024 Type: 1 Commenter: Judi Brawer
Hi Jeremy, thank you for providing the soil survey. It appears that most of the project area is a pinyon-juniper ecological site. What community phase is the project area? And, what percentage of trees would this project remove?
Comment 02/06/2024 Type: 1 Commenter: Jeremy Cox
Most of the area would be considered phase 2 transitioning into phase 3 pinyon and juniper. Photos show existing sagebrush, bitterbrush and perennial grass/forb plant communities still surviving in the understory. We will remove many of the trees in a mosaic pattern mimicking fire leaving islands of cover for wildlife and livestock.
Comment 02/05/2024 Type: 1 Commenter: Kendall Bagley
Jeremy, Great Project love to see the work in this area, moving forward a couple thoughts to consider are the HIG/F Project Quality/Need/Benefit: High interest game and fish species listed in the proposal. This section is designed to elevate HIG/F species project proposals should include at least a sentence or two for each species listed to receive full points for this section. Some information has been covered well; in addition, more points can be allocated to this section for HIG/F, Quality/Need/Benefit. I didn't see information pertaining to elk as one of the species listed, can you add additional information on the benefitted species you listed and how they will benefit form the treatment? Thanks
Comment 02/06/2024 Type: 1 Commenter: Jeremy Cox
Kendall, Thanks for pointing this out. I went back into the project details and noted some information that was left out. We feel this project will be of great benefit to mule deer and elk. The freeway fence has become a bottle neck for wildlife movement and this project will create some high quality transition and winter range for the wildlife and take some of the pressure of the muley point area that is currently getting used very heavily by deer and elk.
Comment 02/07/2024 Type: 1 Commenter: Scott Chamberlain
Looks like there is a good understory of browse species making this a great location for the proposal. However, in many of the photos there appears to be few to no herbaceous species. Could the site benefit from a small amount of grass and forbs being added?
Comment 02/08/2024 Type: 1 Commenter: Jeremy Cox
Scott, Generally overall the project has decent persisting understory. Yes their are places that are lacking but we feel with the removal of the pinyon and juniper what is still there will respond very well and in return be a great seed source for nearby areas that are lacking.
Comment 02/12/2024 Type: 1 Commenter: Barbara Sugarman
Hi Jeremy, I just wanted to put on your radar that there is a mapped Utah prairie dog colony approximately 1 mile south of the project area that is currently occupied by prairie dogs. There is a possibility that Utah prairie dogs could potentially benefit from this project with potential suitable habitat expansion, but I would recommend talking to Derek first and getting his thoughts before adding them as a species that would benefit from this project. Thanks!
Comment 02/12/2024 Type: 1 Commenter: Derek Christensen
I think the project could benefit UPD if they were to expand from their current occupied habitat in Buckskin Valley. I think if this were to happen there would need to be more suitable habitat between the occupied habitat and the proposed treatment area. Reducing the amount of PJ would increase habitat suitability for UPD, however, increasing big sagebrush cover would decrease habitat suitability for UPD.
Completion
Start Date:
End Date:
FY Implemented:
Final Methods:
Project Narrative:
Future Management:
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
13561 Affected Area
13563 Terrestrial Treatment Area Vegetation removal / hand crew Lop and scatter
Project Map
Project Map