Pariette Wetlands Water Control Improvement Phase 4
Project ID: 7098
Status: Current
Fiscal Year: 2025
Submitted By: N/A
Project Manager: Jordan McMahon
PM Agency: Bureau of Land Management
PM Office:
Lead: Bureau of Land Management
WRI Region: Northeastern
Description:
Building on previous projects (5287, 5703, 6731), this proposal addresses additional infrastructure repairs that are needed to restore Pariette and set in on a maintenance schedule going forward.
Location:
Approximately 50 miles southwest of Vernal, Utah within the Pariette Wash Watershed, terminating at the confluence of the Green River, on BLM Administered lands. Jointly Managed with UDWR.
Project Need
Need For Project:
Pariette Wetlands was created in the late 1970's through a cooperative BLM-UDWR Sikes Act Management Plan to improve fish and wildlife habitat on public lands. The wetlands are comprised of 10,627 acres (7931 Desert Upland, 2696 Riparian), and is situated within a 22,000 acre Federally designated Area of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC). Pariette was designated as an ACEC to "address protection of special status bird and plant species and habitat, wetlands ecosystems, waterfowl production, and soils, to enhance and protect the wetlands community and associated habitat adjacent to Pariette and Castle Peak Washes, and to provide habitat necessary for waterfowl production and sensitive raptor prey base and nesting habitat". These designations were put forth in the Myton Habitat Management Plan, the Diamond Mountain Resource Management Plan, and further refined in the Vernal Field Office current Resource Management Plan. Pariette is a gravity fed complex with 22 ponds comprising approximately 450 surface acres, and 1100 acres of native wet meadows. The water control system consists of 4.7 miles of dikes, 4.6 miles of irrigation ditches, four water diversion structures from Pariette Wash, 1200 feet of culverts, 62 head-gates, and 22 risers to control water levels. In addition to rehabilitating and replacing many of these structures, this project will repair roads, remove invasive trees, plant native seed and cottonwoods, replace gabions, dredge ponds of accumulated sediment, fix overland water flow issues, and construct and repair recreational infrastructure. These projects will be carried out over multiple years, subject to labor/contracting constraints and available funding. Critics of this project claim it is an artificial wetland, however, that does not change its legal status as a wetland and it's contributions to recreation, ecosystem services, and wildlife habitat. Approximately 90% of wetlands have been lost across the United states since the 1700's, therefore it is imperative that existing wetlands be protected and preserved for the benefit of future generations. Additionally, conversations are currently occurring with UDWR/USFWS in relation to raising native/endangered fishes in the ponds at Pariette (specifically Boneytail and Roundtail Chubs). However, these efforts will not be attempted until critical infrastructure is repaired. Species benefits: Multiple species will benefit from the implementation of this project. Some benefits are obvious, and some may be less obvious and linked to a functional wetland ecosystem. Big game animals such as deer, elk, black bear, and pronghorn will benefit from the heightened availability of water sources and high quality forage. Although no DWR game collar data exists for this area, BLM staff regularly see these big game species using Pariette. This is also true for wild turkey and pheasant. Avian diversity is extremely high at Pariette. All listed waterfowl will benefit from increased pond area and food sources. Specifically, Pariette was originally designed for three different feeding methods employed by various waterfowl. This was accomplished by providing shallow water habitat (1-6 inch depth), dabbler habitat (6 inch to 3 feet depth), and deep water or diver habitat (>3 feet depth). While these ponds still exist on the landscape, the BLM is currently unable to fill them and manage the depths due to failed infrastructure. Additionally, restoration of this infrastructure will allow the BLM to draw down and refill ponds at various times in order to grow food for migrating waterfowl (ie drain after spring migration, refill for fall migration). These benefits coincide with the American white pelican, sandhill crane, Canada goose, cinnamon teal, gadwall, mallard, redhead, swans, and other ducks/waterfowl. These actions will also benefit all raptor species (bald eagle, peregrine, other raptors) by providing a prey base and nesting habitat. Monarchs and bumble bees will benefit from the planting of native flowering plants and providing roost areas with planted cottonwoods. Northern leopard frogs will benefit from more ponds on the landscape, as will all bat species in the area due to increased food availability. The Uintah basin hookless cactus will benefit from the continued conservation and monitoring provided by this project.
Objectives:
Repair and restore failed infrastructure to return Pariette to a functional state. This project will repair roads, remove invasive trees, plant native seed and cottonwoods, replace gabions, dredge ponds of accumulated sediment, fix overland water flow issues, and construct and repair recreational infrastructure. Additionally, this project will repair/replace head gates and stoplog structures on the redhead dam and rehabilitate the fish fountain, and replace the trash rack/screen at the inlet of the wetland complex.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
UDWR and the BLM committed to jointly manage and maintain Pariette wetlands upon it's construction in the 1970's. These efforts have fallen off in recent years, thus the timing is past due to repair and rehabilitate one of the most important ecosystem types that we manage; wetlands. Following the success of our joint diversion replacement project (6731), BLM seeks to continue improvements and repairs. Additionally, water is becoming more and more scarce in the western U.S., and having proofed our water rights in 2023, the BLM seeks to repair all failed infrastructure and place all of it on a repeating management/maintenance schedule that will be a part of BLM/UDWR's Integrated Activity Plan for Pariette wetlands. This project will serve the Vernal BLM's Resource Management Plan, and the Myton Habitat Management Plan, both of which govern Pariette. Additionally, fixing infrastructure and rehabilitating Pariette to a functional state will allow the BLM to formulate a detailed maintenance and management plan.
Relation To Management Plan:
VERNAL APPROVED RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN Special Designations: Areas of Critical Environmental Concern ACEC-11 Pariette Wetlands (10,627 acres) will continue to be designated as an ACEC. A comprehensive integrated activity plan will be developed/implemented that will address protection of special status bird and plant species and habitat, wetlands ecosystem, waterfowl production, and soil. OHV use will be limited to designated routes. Visual Resources will be managed as Class III. The project area not only overlaps the plan objective, it is the plan objective for the Special Designations section of the Vernal RMP for the Pariette Wetlands ACEC. The relevance of this project is directly proportional to the successful implementation of the plan through the protection of special status bird and plant species and habitat, wetlands ecosystem, waterfowl production, and soil once this project is successfully completed. MYTON HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN Wetlands Management Objectives a. Expand wetland habitat including waterfowl and shorebird habitat b. Provide upland game bird habitat, protecting and enhancing avian prey base and habitat conditions for the peregrine falcon. c. Protect threatened cactus, and provide suitable nesting and feeding habitat for migrating greater sandhill cranes and whooping cranes. Planned Actions to Meet Objectives a. Obtain water rights b. Modify water control structures c. Compile water quality and flow data d. Manage prescribed and wild fire e. Irrigate cereal and grain crops for wildlife The project area completely overlaps and ties in the Wetlands Management Objectives of the Myton HMP. The relevance of the project is directly proportional to the successful implementation of the plan by achieving objectives a., b., and c., of the Myton HMP Wetlands Management Objectives, and by applying planned actions b., and e., of the Planned Actions to Meet Wetland Management Objectives. UTAH WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN-2015 Threat - Sediment Transport Imbalance Objective #1 for Sediment Transport Imbalance: Opportunities are found and taken, to modify or remove reservoir infrastructure, or modify outflow management, to simulate or return natural sediment transport. Potential Indicators of Success Reaching this Objective 1. Working to restore a more natural hydrograph (spring peak) is part of reaching sediment balance. 2. Sediment transport supports natural ecology or sufficiently promotes native species reproduction. Potential Conservation Actions Code Action 2.1.12 Build new or retrofit old dams with proven features designed to pass sediment. 2.1.13 Work with water users/reservoir operators to identify reservoirs where loss of storage due to sediment input is a concern. The project area overlaps the objective of the Utah WAP by addressing the threat of Sediment Transport Imbalance. The relevance of this project to the successful implementation of the Utah WAP is directly proportional to the objective listed under this threat by modifying outflow management and simulate or return natural sediment transport. The potential indicator of success reaching this objective will include (#2) Sediment transport supports natural ecology of sufficiently promotes native species reproduction; and, the potential conservation actions code addressed as a result will be code 2.1.13, work with water users/reservoir operators to identify reservoirs where loss of storage due to sediment input is a concern. UTAH MULE DEER STATEWIDE MANAGEMENT PLAN Habitat Objective 2: Improve the quality and quantity of vegetation for mule deer on a minimum of 500,000 acres of crucial range by 2019. Strategies: b. Work with land management agencies, conservation organizations, private landowners, and local leaders through the regional Watershed Restoration Initiative working groups to identify and prioritize mule deer habitats that are in need of enhancement or restoration. e. Continue to support and provide leadership for the Utah Watershed Restoration Initiative, which emphasizes improving sagebrush-steppe, aspen, and riparian habitats throughout Utah. This project overlaps the Habitat Objective 2 by reducing non-native and noxious weeds within the wetland complex and generating more suitable crucial habitat for mule deer. The strategies used to achieve project overlap include implementing b., and e., under the Habitat Objective 2 of the Plan. UINTAH COUNTY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN Riparian and Wetland Areas Objectives and Policies 20.4.2 Conserve and protect riparian areas through application of best management practices 20.4.12 Encourage efforts to enhance streambeds and control erosion. Increase coverage and composition of vegetation. 20.4.17 Participate in federal, tribal, state, and local wetland conservation planning processes. This project overlaps the objectives and policies under the riparian and wetland areas section of the Plan by applying policy 20.4.2, 20.4.12, and 20.4.17 through the implementation and completion of the project.
Fire / Fuels:
he overall management scenario for the wetland system is to create, maintain, and improve adequate nesting habitat for water obligate species. Data shows the optimum vegetation community needed for this scenario is reached when a 50:50 ratio of vegetation to open water is achieved. Due to the inability of adequately distributing water throughout the system combined with continual wet/dry cycles, that ratio has shifted to approximately 80:20. In order to return the system to the desired equilibrium it is necessary to utilize fire to reduce the excessive fuel load, however, adequate water is also needed in order to inundate the burn and hold back regeneration. In working toward this goal the BLM has recently finalized an Environmental Assessment (EA) that specifically addresses a burn plan for the wetland complex. This plan has been implemented bi-annually since fall of 2020. The successful completion of this project will complement that burn plan in order to achieve the optimum nesting, foraging, and loafing critical habitat desired by providing the ability to adequately store and transfer water to these burn sites when needed. Once implemented this burn plan will significantly reduce the fuel load within the system and by having adequate water delivery the continuity of regenerating excessive fuel loads will be interrupted and greatly reduced thus creating less need to burn and provide greater ability to manage critical habitat. In addition, the implementation of the burn plan will reduce excessive fuel loads which currently threaten permanent infrastructures in place. As previously mentioned the wetland complex is a gravity fed system which equates to permanent structures installed within, and adjacent to all the ponds within the complex. By removing the excess fuel load and actively managing to keep the fuel load reduced these structures will realize a longer life expectancy which will ultimately provide a significant reduction in replacement costs. Additionally, there are several primitive camp sites located within the wetland complex and excessive fuel loads have inundated the areas surrounding these sites. A reduction in the fuel load around these recreation sites along with active post-burn management will generate far less risk to the public who utilizes them. Because the overall management objective for the wetland complex is to manage habitat for water obligate species, the burn plan priority is targeting the excessive fuel load in and around the 21 ponds within all four management units. This equates to approximately 1600 acres throughout the four management units and includes pond surface areas, pond perimeters and wet meadows. In addition, and due to the inability to adequately distribute water in the past which as generated an excessive amount of noxious, invasive, and undesirable plant species overland, the secondary priority is to also burn these areas in order to bring back desirable species for the benefit of all wildlife utilizing the wetlands. This secondary priority will include approximately 4.6 miles of irrigation ditches, 4.2 miles of riparian habitat and the removal of excessive fuel loads along 4.7 miles of dikes. Additionally, contracting youth crews to manually remove invasive woody species will further reduce the risk of severe wildfire and be complimentary to prescribed burning efforts that occur bi-annually at Pariette.
Water Quality/Quantity:
This project has the potential to significantly improve water quality within the wetland complex. Benefits resulting from the successful completion of this project include the reduction of severe wildfire as a result of fuel overload. By implementing the BLM burn plan to reduce significant fuel overload and having the ability to properly store and distribute water, fuels overload would be kept to a minimum thereby reducing the risk of severe wildfire. In addition, after the successful completion of this project, water will be able to be properly stored and transported to the management units appropriately without overland flooding occurring. The result of which will significantly reduce adding pollutants to the system through percolation and reducing the amount of sediment transport within, and out of, the system. Additional benefits of improved water quality will be realized by addressing the excess TMDL's and impaired status of the Pariette Watershed by the UDEQ. By eliminating or reducing the addition of pollutants through percolation and reducing sediment load transfer the wetland complex will begin to adequately process, store and uptake associated heavy metals and the reduction of sediment load will aid in a reduction of sediment transport to the Green River ecosystem, all of which will aid in reducing the TMDL's within the watershed. Specifically, selenium will be mitigated even further by restoring the functional acreage of the wetland. Current estimates of selenium reduction are around 70-90% from the top to the bottom of the wetland. This project also has the potential to increase water quantity within the wetland complex. After the successful completion of this project water will no longer be wasted by overland flow. That portion of water will now be a benefit by remaining instream and will help to maintain those flows. In addition, when the burn plan and this project are implemented in concert, changes in the vegetation class will occur through the removal of water gorging plants including Saltcedar (Tamarix spp.), Russian Olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia) and Greasewood (Sarcobatus vermiculatus) which will be in part accomplished through the contracted through a youth crew. The expected outcome will be an elevation in hydrologic storage capacity.
Compliance:
This project is in compliance with the Environmental Assessment (EA) and Habitat Management Plan (HMP) written for Pariette Wetlands. Through analysis of the EA, it was recognized that all the infrastructure was subject to replacement over time due to environmental factors degrading those structures. Subsequently, the document allows for the replacement of those structures as long as the replacement occurs on the same footprint as the original disturbance and no new disturbance is realized. This project is also in compliance with Section 404(f) of the Clean Water Act and is exempt from permitting requirements under categories 1, Normal farming, silviculture and ranching activities; 2, Maintenance Activities; and 3, Construction and maintenance of farm ponds, stock ponds, or irrigation ditches or the maintenance of drainage ditches, of the Clean Water Act Exemptions. In addition, this project is covered by the Nationwide Permit (NWP) issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Section 3. Maintenance, Paragraph (a); The repair, rehabilitation, or replacement of any previously authorized, currently serviceable structure or fill, or of any currently serviceable structure or fill authorized by 33 CFR 330.3, provided that the structure or fill is not to be put to uses differing from those uses specified or contemplated for it in the original permit or the most recently authorized modification. Minor deviations in the structure's configuration or filled area, including those due to changes in materials, construction, techniques, requirements of other regulatory agencies, or current construction codes or safety standards that are necessary to make the repair, rehabilitation, or replacement are authorized. This NWP also authorizes the removal of previously authorized structures or fills. Any stream channel modification is limited to the minimum necessary for the repair, rehabilitation, or replacement of the structure or fill; such modifications, including the removal of material from the stream channel, must be immediately adjacent to the project. This NWP also authorizes the removal of accumulated sediment and debris within, and in the immediate vicinity of, the structure or fill. This NWP also authorizes the repair, rehabilitation, or replacement of those structures or fills destroyed or damaged by storms, floods, fire or other discrete events, provided the repair, rehabilitation, or replacement is commenced, or is under contract to commence, within two years of the date of their destruction or damage. In cases of catastrophic events, such as hurricanes or tornadoes, this two-year limit may be waived by the district engineer, provided the permittee can demonstrate funding, contract, or other similar delays.
Methods:
Construction of 22 pre-cast concrete risers will be contracted by the BLM or UDWR. This contract will include casting sections of culvert into the back of the risers to aid installation efforts. Installation will be jointly accomplished by UDWR and BLM equipment crews and/or contracts. Road repair to accommodate hunters and recreationalists will consist of repairing cuts on dams and dikes, hauling in and spreading road base, and installing culverts in high rain flow areas where there is existing road damage. Tree removal will be accomplished via a collaborative effort by UDWR/BLM equipment crews, prescribed burning, and youth crews. Maintenance of tree removal areas will be emphasized by treating re-sprouts with herbicide. Native seed mix will be purchased from GBRC (the mix is already existing) and distributed in construction areas as well as along walking paths, along pond edges, and areas that are selected to increase the survival rates of seed. Cottonwoods will be purchased from greenhouses and transplanted from adjacent BLM lands. There are three locations where rock baskets/gabions need to be replaced, this will aid in the filtration of water in the Pariette wash and limit sedimentation. These gabions will be filled partially with rock on site, and partially from rock hauled in that is free of artificial materials (i.e. asphault). Ponds will also be dredged of accumulated sediment, deepening them to aid in efforts to keep water in them year round. Several areas have been identified where there is a need to fix overland water flow issues, this will be accomplished by building earthen dams. Construction and repair of recreational infrastructure will consist of replacing worn out walking paths, benches, tables, and bridges. Repairs on the redhead dam will consist of purchasing and installing a new head gate, rehabilitating the fish fountain, and repairing gabions. Replacing the trash rack at the inlet will consist of fabricating and installing a trash rack. Restoration of the Pariette wash upstream to Pleasant Valley along the entire length of the Pariette ACEC will focus on erosion control and sediment retention to extend the life of the ponds by limiting inputs of sedimentation. Methods for low-tech stream restoration can be seen in the documents section.
Monitoring:
Monitoring will consist of checking for leaks around repaired/replaced water control structures, monitoring native seed germination/survival, cottonwood survival, weed control, treatments of re-sprouting russian olive and tamarisk, and visitor use/satisfaction surveys.
Partners:
USFWS, UDWR, USU, GBRC, UCC, Ducks unlimited.
Future Management:
In general, future management will include applying techniques to raise and lower water levels to achieve habitat objectives for multitude of species. Lower water for shore birds, puddle ducks, and brood rearing habitat for pheasants and quail. Raise water levels for waterfowl brood rearing habitat, diver ducks, swans, and others species. Increase prescribed fire regime intervals contingent on where water placement and draw downs will be each year. Plant annual food plots, perennial nesting and brood rearing habitat in areas where weeds have been reduced. More specifically, management objectives for the wetland complex will continue to follow the prescriptions set forth within the Myton Habitat Management Plan (HMP) (attached). Methods described there, and efforts described herein, will inform the development of an Integrated Activity Plan. The long term goals for Pariette are to establish a maintenance schedule, establish continuous funding from BLM nationals, purchase and maintenance of heavy equipment that will stay on site, and the development of biological research to include graduate student investigations of soil dynamics, water dynamics and hydrology, ecosystem stability, effects of burning on macroinvertebrate communities, effects of macroinvertebrate communities on waterfowl production, predator prey interactions, and various other studies that will continue to inform management efforts nationwide upon publication.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
The potential for this project to improve quality sustainable uses is extremely high for recreation. Currently, most visitor usage in the wetland complex includes hunting, botanical, and bird watching. After completion of this project expected increases in both flora and fauna will be realized due to habitat improvement. This in turn will improve the quality of the visitor experience. In addition, the quantity of sustainable uses will be realized by eliminating, or significantly reducing large stands of Salt cedar and Russian Olive within the riparian area of the wetland complex. Removing invasive woody vegetation will facilitate the re-establishment of perennial grasses, native forbs, and shrubs that have much higher forage value than invasive species. Additionally, creating a diverse ecosystem in terms of high ecological functional redundancy and species diversity will ensure that the Pariette community will be buffered against the effects of climate change, including changing temperatures and hydrological regimes. This project is unique, in that it is guaranteed to work and restore valuable wetland habitat, benefiting all species found in the species list. It is not experimental, it is the replacement of failed infrastructure that will effectively double our functional habitat on the landscape.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$440,600.00 $805,600.00 $1,246,200.00 $116,000.00 $1,362,200.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Materials and Supplies Purchase associated materials for head gate repairs and replacements, culverts, redhead dam repair, concrete blocks for one diversion structure, fuel, other materials as needed for maintenance. $25,000.00 $50,000.00 $0.00 2025
Materials and Supplies Purchase trash rack, gabion materials, dike construction and maintenance materials (cobble rock), road maintenance materials, fuel, other materials as needed for maintenance. $20,000.00 $100,000.00 $0.00 2026
Equipment Rental/Use Installation/labor for risers, head gates, trash rack, gabions, dam repair, other maintenance tasks $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $30,000.00 2025
Equipment Rental/Use Rental and use of dredging equipment $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $20,000.00 2026
Seed (GBRC) Native seed mix for Pariette $7,000.00 $7,000.00 $2,000.00 2025
Other Purchase and planting of cottonwood trees $6,500.00 $6,500.00 $2,000.00 2025
Other UCC crews $10,500.00 $10,500.00 $2,000.00 2025
Equipment Rental/Use Lease or rent equipment such as a trackhoe, bulldozer, dumptrucks, trailers, and other heavy equipment needed to accomplish tasks. These leases/rentals will occur for up to 24 (non-consecutive) months. $61,600.00 $141,600.00 $30,000.00 2025
Contractual Services Tree removal, herbicide, and monitoring on 150 acres ($1,100/acre) $50,000.00 $230,000.00 $20,000.00 2026
Contractual Services Contract to repair roads throughout the wetland. This will involve hauling and spreading road base and installing culverts $60,000.00 $60,000.00 $0.00 2026
Contractual Services Contract to install 23 new concrete risers throughout the wetland $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $10,000.00 2025
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$375,000.00 $805,600.00 $1,180,600.00 $116,451.32 $1,297,051.32
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
Species Protection Account E201 $25,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
BLM BIL - Ecosystem Restoration A225 Base Funding $104,126.36 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) $0.00 $325,000.00 $30,000.00 2026
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) $0.00 $480,600.00 $86,000.00 2025
BLM BIL - Ecosystem Restoration A225 ASAP 21 $195,873.64 $0.00 $0.00 2026
Habitat Council Account QHCR $50,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
DWR-WRI Project Admin In-Kind $0.00 $0.00 $451.32 2025
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
American White Pelican N4
Threat Impact
Flight Paths Low
Bald Eagle N5
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Low
Big Free-tailed Bat N3
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Black Bear
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Bonytail N1
Threat Impact
Data Gaps - Inadequate Understanding of Ecology and Life History NA
Bonytail N1
Threat Impact
Droughts Very High
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Low
Wild Turkey R1
Threat Impact
Storms and Flooding High
Mourning Dove R2
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Northern Leopard Frog N5
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Peregrine Falcon N4
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Pronghorn R3
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Ring-necked Pheasant R3
Threat Impact
Conversion from Flood to Sprinkler Irrigation High
Roundtail Chub N3
Threat Impact
Data Gaps - Inadequate Understanding of Ecology and Life History NA
Roundtail Chub N3
Threat Impact
Droughts Very High
Sandhill Crane R4
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Canada Goose R1
Threat Impact
Agricultural / Municipal / Industrial Water Usage Very High
Cinnamon Teal R1
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Gadwall R1
Threat Impact
Agricultural / Municipal / Industrial Water Usage Very High
Gadwall R1
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Mallard R1
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Mallard R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Low
Redhead R1
Threat Impact
Agricultural / Municipal / Industrial Water Usage Very High
Redhead R1
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Other Ducks R3
Threat Impact
Agricultural / Municipal / Industrial Water Usage Very High
Other Ducks R3
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Swan Species R3
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Monarch butterfly N3
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Uinta Basin Hookless Cactus N3
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Western bumble bee N3
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Habitats
Habitat
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Agricultural / Municipal / Industrial Water Usage Very High
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Conversion from Flood to Sprinkler Irrigation Low
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Dam / Reservoir Operation Medium
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Presence of Dams High
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Temperature Extremes Unknown
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Water Allocation Policies Very High
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Agricultural / Municipal / Industrial Water Usage Very High
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Conversion from Flood to Sprinkler Irrigation Low
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Dam / Reservoir Operation Medium
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Sediment Transport Imbalance Medium
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Fire and Fire Suppression Medium
Desert Grassland
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Desert Grassland
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Desert Grassland
Threat Impact
Soil Erosion / Loss Medium
Lowland Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Lowland Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Very High
Lowland Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Inadequate Restoration Tools or Methods NA
Open Water
Threat Impact
Dam / Reservoir Operation Low
Open Water
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Open Water
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Open Water
Threat Impact
Sediment Transport Imbalance Medium
Riverine
Threat Impact
Channelization / Bank Alteration (direct, intentional) High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Project Comments
Comment 01/17/2024 Type: 1 Commenter: Tory Mathis
Can you please add map features to help reviewers better understand your project?
Comment 01/18/2024 Type: 1 Commenter: Jordan McMahon
Thanks for the suggestion, I've added map features.
Comment 01/17/2024 Type: 1 Commenter: Natalie Boren
Hi Jordon, you have both Bonytail and Roundtail Chub as benefiting from this project. I can't find any details of how these would directly benefit these two species or any plans for the future. We would love to work with you in the future if this is a place we could stock and propagate Roundtail Chub, but I am not aware or in the know about any plans at this time. Thank you
Comment 01/18/2024 Type: 1 Commenter: Jordan McMahon
Hi Natalie, I just mentioned it briefly in the project details: need for project section, but I didn't call them out by name specifically. I just updated it. We had a couple of field visits this year in relation to raising Boneytail or Roundtail Chubs in Pariette, but we all agreed critical infrastructure would need to be replaced and repaired first. Thanks for the comment and I look forward to working with you going forward.
Comment 01/22/2024 Type: 1 Commenter: Saidee Hyder
Great proposal for updating infrastructure at Pariette. I do think that after these needed improvements to the ponds are made that the potential for experimental ponds or brood stock ponds for Roundtail Chub and Bonytail are more likely to occur. I also think Razorback Sucker could be considered depending on the experiments with growing them out with Bonytail or if the river connections allow, potentially attempting to entrain larval fish like other wetland complexes along the Green River. Like we've discussed I think this could potentially benefit Bonytail in a big way moving forward as we work toward better recovery strategies for one of the least recovered species. Especially after seeing their positive response as far as spawning goes within the other wetlands this past year. Good luck and I look forward to hopefully working with you in the future!
Comment 01/26/2024 Type: 1 Commenter: Jordan McMahon
Thank you for the feedback Saidee, I look forward to collaborating as well!
Comment 01/23/2024 Type: 1 Commenter: Tory Mathis
An update to the ranking criteria for this year says that in order for a project to score full points, it should include a sentence or two for each species listed. You have quite a list of benefitting species, and maybe they all really will benefit from this, but I don't see anything in the proposal that justifies including that many. Can you please explain how this project will specifically benefit the species listed?
Comment 01/26/2024 Type: 1 Commenter: Jordan McMahon
Thanks Tory, I've added more details to the need for project section.
Comment 01/24/2024 Type: 1 Commenter: Amanda Barth
To speak to this project's benefits to monarchs you can include: increased roosting and perching opportunities by adding cottonwoods and other structural diversity; increased mid- and late-season nectar availability by planting rabbitbrush, bee plant, and sunflower. Thanks!
Comment 01/26/2024 Type: 1 Commenter: Jordan McMahon
Thanks for the suggestions Amanda. We have also been planting a lot of milkweed seeds, and there is a healthy population of A. speciosa and labriformis as well.
Comment 01/24/2024 Type: 1 Commenter: Brian Maxfield
Great project to improve the area. Any opportunity to increase stability in the ponds will benefit a large number of species. Numerous bat species could use this area. We have conducted acoustic and mist netting up the wash a few miles from Pariette and get a variety of bats.
Comment 01/26/2024 Type: 1 Commenter: Jordan McMahon
Thanks for the comment Brian, I agree that there are likely numerous bat species using the area with the high densities of arthropods we see hatching out of the ponds. I plan to implement some more bat monitoring as part of our overall ecosystem management plan.
Comment 02/22/2024 Type: 1 Commenter: Jim Spencer
Hello Jordan, as always, that's an impressive species list. The Uinta Basin hookless cactus is indeed present at Pariette, which is how it got its scientific name, but I don't see how the planned activities, including the monitoring listed in the Project Details section, will benefit the species. It already receives the protection from the ESA and from being on Federal land and with the Agency's responsibilities to ensure its protection. The threat listed is drought, however, these practices will not remedy the cactus susceptibility to drought. I am glad you are looking out for the species, but I don't think it is appropriate to list it as a benefitting species for the current project proposal activities.
Comment 02/26/2024 Type: 1 Commenter: Jordan McMahon
Hello Jim, I do agree with this sentiment. However, there are a couple of populations of Uinta Basin hookless cactus that are adjacent to the lowest pond in our complex, Redhead Pond. The individuals are about 10 meters from the edge of a wet meadow on the upper end of the pond, and so my thoughts are that increasing our ability to control water (and specifically for this population fix the lower Redhead dam) would actually provide a heightened water table in this case. If you think this is a stretch however, I would consider removing this species from the list.
Comment 02/22/2024 Type: 1 Commenter: Jim Spencer
I really like that your seed mix is all native species. There is a lot of land under the seeding polygon on the map, there are also varying habitat types. You have a combination of wetland and upland species in your mix. Are you, by chance, going to have GBRC separate your mix into an upland and wetland mix? There are some species in there that are not compatible with each other, such as Nebraska sedge and rubber rabbit brush. If you had separate mixes, you could use the seed strategically and seed it where it will grow. I apologize if that was mentioned somewhere and I missed it.
Comment 02/26/2024 Type: 1 Commenter: Jordan McMahon
That is a great point Jim. I had not considered this strategy but I think that I will do so going forward. Since we are planning construction/restoration on such a large area, it indeed does include differing habitat types. Thanks again for the suggestion.
Comment 02/24/2024 Type: 1 Commenter: Evan DeHamer
Jordan, I'm a fan of wetland work. it's a complex, expensive process but one of the best things we can do for ecosystem function. If you're able for this proposal (or future phases), it'd help rankers if you could add the EA, burn plans and some imagery to that section. I tried the video link but various permissions weren't playing nice so went back to Par Ph3. and other resources for a more complete frame of reference. Thanks!
Comment 02/26/2024 Type: 1 Commenter: Jordan McMahon
Hi Evan, Thanks for the thoughtful comments. It is definitely a long road to repair such a large area and regain that ecosystem function! I will upload the burn plan in the documents section. The closest thing to an EA we have is the document that is titled "Myton Habitat Management Plan" in the documents section. Although it is old, it lines out all our management objectives which remain the same. The replacement of all of the failed infrastructure under this project is considered a maintenance action, and therefore does not need a new EA. However, it is not lost on me that we do need an updated management plan, which is in the process of getting written/analyzed. Unfortunately BLM Travel Management efforts have taken priority on the NEPA side of things.
Completion
Start Date:
End Date:
FY Implemented:
Final Methods:
Project Narrative:
Future Management:
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
3024 Water development point feature Reconstruction Water Control Structure
3025 Water development point feature Reconstruction Water Control Structure
3026 Water development point feature Removal Water Control Structure
3027 Water development point feature Reconstruction Water Control Structure
3028 Water development point feature Reconstruction Water Control Structure
3029 Other point feature
3030 Other point feature
3031 Other point feature
3032 Fish passage structure Maintenance Barrier (physical)
13749 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Herbicide application Spot treatment
13749 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Vegetation Improvements Manual removal / hand crew
13749 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Vegetation Improvements Mechanical removal
13749 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Vegetation Improvements Seeding
13750 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Lake/Wetland/Pond Improvements Dredging
13829 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Stream Corridor/Channel Improvements Instream random boulder placement
Project Map
Project Map