Kanab Creek Woody Invasive Mitigation and Restoration Project Phase 1
Project ID: 7404
Status: Draft
Fiscal Year: 2026
Submitted By: N/A
Project Manager: Jordan Moody
PM Agency: Other
PM Office: Other
Lead: Best Friends Animal Society
WRI Region: Southern
Description:
Approximately 3.4 miles of Kanab Creek flows through Best Friends Animal Society (BFAS) in Kanab, Utah. Currently, 1.25 miles have received treatment and passive restoration efforts. The proposed Kanab Creek Woody Invasive Mitigation and Restoration Project will resume from the most recent northern treatment boundary and continue south to the BFAS property boundary near HWY 89. Phase I includes retreatments, active vegetation restoration, and protocols that minimize native habitat disturbances.
Location:
The project location is the length of Kanab Creek that traverses through Best Friends Animal Society from the southern boundary adjacent to HWY 89, extending northeast to acreage managed by the Bureau of Land Management. Riparian enhancement treatments are planned for grazing allotments BFAS leases from the BLM.
Project Need
Need For Project:
The stakeholders who participated in the development of the Kanab Creek Coordinated Resource Management Plan, Best Friends Animal Society Master Plan, and Kane County Natural Resource Plan have all identified the need for woody invasive treatment protocols for Kanab Creek, area springs, and associated drainages. Best Friends Animal Society's ecological and botanical surveys placed woody invasive species in their top tiers of concern. Moreover, other agency assessments also supported reductions in riparian habitat, biodiversity losses, and reduced water flow in associated wetlands caused by woody invasives. Surface water resources are very limited in Kane County and while there are a few options for groundwater resource development, woody invasives alter surface flows and groundwater recharge while decreasing biodiversity and habitat resiliency. Best Friends Animal Society, area municipalities, agriculture, recreation, and some local industries rely upon the water resources of Kanab Creek which originates below the rim of the Pansaugant and Markagunt Plateaus near Alton, Utah. The presence of woody invasive species salt cedar (Tamarix chinensis), and Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia) continue to dominate the riparian species composition. Their removals and restoration of native vegetative habitats are the focus of this project.
Objectives:
The objective of the Kanab Creek Woody Invasive Mitigation Project is to implement woody invasive treatment protocols and restore habitat. In 2026, our treatment goals include the removal of invasive species from 38 acres and retreatment of previously treated areas. Approximately 45-90% of the Kanab Creek riparian corridor, which runs through lands owned and managed by Best Friends Animal Sanctuary, is dominated by Tamarix and Elaeagnus (Russian Olive). Primary Restoration Goals: 1. Reduce Woody Invasive Species: We aim to decrease the prevalence of woody invasive species through mechanical, chemical, vegetative, and retreatment methods. This will enhance the survivability of native plants and animals and increase the resilience of Kanab Creek, its drainages, wetlands, seeps, and meadows. Historically, "Prior to the 1880s, Kanab Creek in Kanab Canyon was a small stream flowing through a large wet meadow with a high water table. However, catastrophic floods during the 1880s, likely exacerbated by overgrazing, caused the streambed to drop 20-30 meters, resulting in separate wet meadows fed by springs along an upper bench and exposing a lower series of springs just above the current level of Kanab Creek." (Webb et al., 1992) 2. Reestablish Native Species: We will work on reestablishing cottonwood (Populus fremontii), willow (Salix spp.), and native shrub species following consistent revegetation protocols. 3. Evaluate Cottonwood Health: We will assess decadent and dead cottonwood trees that may be infected with (cytospora) canker, caused by the fungi Leucostoma niveum and Valsa sordida in Colorado (Sinclair and Lyon, 2005; Stevens, 2021); if needed will seek support from plant pathologists or mycologists. 4. Monitor Natural Recruitment: Establish line transects to evaluate the natural recruitment of native grasses and forbs, and reseed using a mixture of native species (Baker, 2016). 5. Improve Water Quality: Enhance water quality and quantity through the development of water catchments and troughs. This will support grazing management processes and strategies for riparian-wetland areas, alleviating riparian stress in the John R. Flat allotment (#UT24064, 258 AUMs) and Brown Canyon allotment (#UT24011, 20 AUMs). 6. Enhance Wildlife Habitat: Improve the habitat complexity of the riparian corridor to support diverse wildlife, including species of concern, through the restoration of native plant communities. 7. Develop Education Programs: Connect accessible walking trails and create interpretive presentations and educational programming about project treatments, native plant communities, and the uses of indigenous plants. 8. Continue Partnerships: Maintain monitoring efforts and restoration partnerships with organizations such as Utah DWR, USDA Fish and Wildlife, BLM, Button Livestock Company, and other private and natural resource organizations. 9. Implement Beaver Assisted Restoration (BAR): Monitor the American beaver (Castor canadensis) present in Kanab Creek as part of our restoration efforts.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
Restoration and mitigation treatments began in 2015 after the development of the Kanab Creek Watershed CRMP and subsequent interagency treatment of a severe monoculture of Lythrum salicaria and woody invasives at Big Lake and adjacent springs and wetlands. This has resulted in an 86% reduction in L.salicaria, and woody invasives. Moreover, these treatments and restoration efforts halted L. salicaria advancement into the Kanab Creek, through interconnected drainages, and increased native vegetation, biodiversity, and hydrology. The current treatment area within BFAS property is approximately 4 miles of primary and secondary sand bottom channels, fringe floodplain wetlands with connections to many perennial and intermittent cliff face seeps, and surface drainages. The riparian corridor width, species composition, and density are variable throughout the treatment length. Also, Kanab Creek riparian floristics, vegetation structure, and wetland hydrology are representative of critical nesting for SWFL. This was recently confirmed by the USDA NRCS Biologist during a site visit in April 2024. Additional monitoring for SWFL and continued monitoring of bat populations will begin in April 2025. While significant restoration and monitoring efforts have been achieved with collaborative partnerships with American Conservation Experience (ACE), Color Country CWMA partners, Northern Arizona University Spring Institute, Color Country BLM, GSENM, Kane County Weed Department, and the Kane County Conservation District; the necessity for additional funding and resource support will further the efforts and project momentum. Moreover, the project timing supports the recent recommendations concerning groundwater resources in a 2024 study conducted by Sunrise Engineering, Inc. for Kane County Water Conservancy District. One of their recommendations stated: "It is recommended that in planning water resources development, the impact of climate change should be considered. The general trend is that the availability of groundwater resources in the study area will likely decrease with time but will also likely fluctuate with extreme weather patterns." The removal of woody invasives will mitigate the losses to groundwater and surface flows caused by Tamarisk and Elaeagnus and support the resource management plans outlined in the Kanab Creek Watershed CRMP, Kane County Natural Resource Management Plan, and the Best Friends Animal Society's Master Plan.
Relation To Management Plan:
The mitigation and restoration efforts align with the Kanab Creek Watershed CRMP, Best Friends Master Plan-Invasive Species Mitigation Protocols, and the Kane County Natural Resource Management Plans. All of these management plans include best practices for the eradication and control of invasive species of concern. Since 2016 BFAS has partnered with multiple local partnerships for the restoration of Big Lake wetlands and Kanab Creek Riparian woody invasive restoration guidelines that outline their removal through mechanical, biological, and chemical methodologies. Chemical use is determined by proximity to native vegetation and water resources. Mitigation and treatment guidelines are similar to recommendations outlined within the Kanab Creek Watershed CRMP, Escalante River Restoration guidelines, and the USDA guidelines for area-specific treatment protocols for both Tamarix and Russian Olive. Patch stand and snag frequency within treatment areas are also included within the management plan and determined by the distance to standing water, saturated soil, and % cover of intact native vegetation that remains after invasive removals.
Fire / Fuels:
The physiological characteristics of Tamarix and Russian Olive decrease soil moisture and increase fire and fuel loads through several mechanisms. When Tamarix drops its leaves, it creates a debris layer known as 'duff' that adds to the fuel load, compounding an already high fire danger in the drought-stricken soils that have low moisture. Decadent and dead trees also contribute. The areas where the densest infestations of Tamarix inhabit within the Kanab Creek corridor of BF property are not easily accessible to humans who are one of the main contributors to fire events. When fires ravage an area, Tamarix ignites quickly, leading to a more severe burn. Consequently, its removal and monitoring are important for fire and fuel reduction protocols. BFAS had an independent evaluation of catastrophic fire scenarios caused by invasive species within the riparian corridor and other upland habitats. The report findings have emphasized the necessity of woody invasive removals and habitat enhancement that will mitigate catastrophic fire events. Fire/Fuel Mitigation Goals: 1) Removal of Tamarix and Russian Olive 2) Increase 'biotic pumps' of ponds and wetlands created by beaver present in the treatment area. 3) Revetation protocols to support beaver expansion that reduces fire/fuel concerns through saturated soils, deep-rooted native vegetation, and an increase in groundwater that facilitates springs and seeps and Kanab Creek flows.
Water Quality/Quantity:
Water quality monitoring sites are predominantly evaluated at Big Lake, and BFAS wells and monitoring sites established by the Utah Division of Water Quality. A permanent water quality testing site for the Utah Division of Water Quality is located at the southwestern boundary of Best Friends (BFAS). TMDL, TIM, values, and HAB's are of greatest concern. Alterations to water quantity are precipitation rates, global climate change, invasive species impacts on groundwater and stream flow, and water rights concerns due to downdraws from inappropriately placed wells. The reduction of woody invasive species and the restoration of a more resilient and diverse canopy will increase both water quality and quantity.
Compliance:
The Utah Division of Water Quality is the only organization that Best Friends Animal Society has compliance guidelines to follow. All other relationships are mutually cooperative or ranked at different types of professional associations.
Methods:
BFAS in cooperation with American Conservation Experience, APHIS and treatment recommendations of organizations undergoing similar projects has Best Management Practices for the following treatment and restoration categories. These are fluid and adjust depending on the treatment goal and any ecological restraints such as habitat enhancement for endangered, species of concern. Treatment Methods: -Woody Invasive Mechanical Treatments and Removal of Debris -Woody Invasive Biological Control Treatments (when applicable) -Chemical treatment strategies on current removals and retreatment protocols -Woody Invasive Monitoring Protocols -Habitat Restoration Standards -Professional Protection Equipment Standards -Monitoring Protocols and Retreatment -Southwestern Fly Catcher Monitoring Protocols -Beaver Monitoring Protocols BAR -Mechanical removal guidelines for Tamarix and Russian Olive are based on stem size diameter, depth of bank, stream bank stability, presence of Southwestern Flycatcher nesting sites, and post-treatment of vegetative-woody debris. Additional Treatment Guidelines -Cut paint, frill cuts, mastication of woody debris, and strategically placed stacks of trunk and stem > than 5" diameter. 4' diameter and below are masticated and used as cover debris to suppress revegetation and provide habitat for small mammals, and invertebrates. -Snag placement protocols are used when the adjacent native habitat is within adequate proximity and will provide nesting cover for neotropical birds including the Southwestern Willow Fly Catcher. -BF restoration strategies and replanting protocols follow guidelines established by the USDA Department of Forestry and Utah State University Extension Recommendations. In addition to protocols developed by the Escalante River Watershed Partnership. -A summary of treatment protocols is available in the ACE BFAS Kanab Creek Woody Invasives Mitigation, Treatments, and Restoration Protocols
Monitoring:
Monitoring protocols begin this year and will be repeated yearly through the treatment polygons, in a sequential order. Retreatment protocols will include mastication, mulch suppression at treatment sites, and additional basal and frill-cut methods. Depending upon regrowth rates biological controls for Tamarix may be used. Monitoring will also include both ground-truthing, drone surveys, and several line transects will be established at various localities throughout the treatment corridor to monitor established native growth stands and revegetation sites. Biological monitoring will also include a minimum of three to five years of monitoring for the Southwestern Willow Fly Catcher that follows the protocols developed by the USDA Fish and Wildlife. Personnel from Best Friends participated in this training in May 2024 and will recertify as needed. Biological monitoring will also include a minimum of three to five-year monitoring for the Southwestern Willow Fly Catcher that follows the protocols developed by the USDA Fish and Wildlife. Personnel from Best Friends participated in this training in May 2024 and will recertify as needed. Lastly, the Kaibab Band of Paiute Indians have a verbal agreement with BFAS that they can visit the sanctuary and collect plants for food, medicine, and other culturally related events. Their use of the different vegetation communities will assist in the evaluation of plant abundance and decreases.
Partners:
Kanab Creek Woody Invasive Partners include: Best Friends Animal Society (BFAS) Canyon Country BLM Range Management Jacob Shakespeare Danny Buttons Kane County, Utah Rancher American Conservation Experience (ACE) NRCS Panguitch Office Christy Hatch, Stan Gurley Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Best Friends Animal Society staff are the future management personnel with numerous contributions from independent contractors, the Kaibab Band of Paiute Indians, and recommendations made by the BLM concerning the grazing allotment.
Future Management:
Best Friends Animal Society staff are the future management personnel with numerous contributions from independent contractors, the Kaibab Band of Paiute Indians, and recommendations made by the BLM and NRCS concerning grazing allotments.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
The sustainable use of natural resources will ensure that all materials are masticated and shredded, then utilized as suppression mulch or strategically placed to create habitats for small mammals and invertebrates, as well as for bank stabilization. As more data regarding the status of the beaver becomes available, the creation of "Beaver Dam Analogues" may become necessary.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$63,000.00 $136,800.00 $199,800.00 $41,012.00 $240,812.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Materials and Supplies Chemical supplied from BLM Kanab Field Office for woody invasive treatments $0.00 $5,000.00 $0.00 2026
Materials and Supplies NRCS and Producer: Brown Canyon Catchment for Button Cattle Company $0.00 $115,800.00 $0.00 2026
Personal Services (permanent employee) Best Friends Animal Society Landscape staff contributions: Vegetation treatments, habitat restoration, greenhouse work, landscape-level duties as assigned, southwestern flycatcher monitoring. $0.00 $16,000.00 $5,200.00 2026
Contractual Services ACE Restoration and Mitigation Services September 2025-December 2025. This budget will only be applied to the woody invasive treatments and restoration efforts of Kanab Creek and associated drainages located within the BF grazing allotment. (15 Acres). $63,000.00 $0.00 $18,312.00 2026
Materials and Supplies Best Friends Animal Society Staff and Volunteers to plant willow planting stock in the footprint of the treated areas. $0.00 $0.00 $17,500.00 2026
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$63,000.00 $136,800.00 $199,800.00 $41,012.00 $240,812.00
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
Other Best Friends Animal Society full time employees and volunteers to harvest and replant willows within the treatment areas. $0.00 $0.00 $17,500.00 2026
BLM (Range) Kanab Field Office Jake Shakespeare Chemical treatment for grazing allotment treatment. $0.00 $5,000.00 $0.00 2026
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Water catchment enhancement and riparian restoration for Button Cattle Company. See attached. $0.00 $115,800.00 $0.00 2026
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative (UWRI) WRI funding sources $63,000.00 $0.00 $18,312.00 2026
Other Treatment contributions Best Friends Animal Society $0.00 $16,000.00 $5,200.00 2026
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Allen's Big-eared Bat N3
Threat Impact
Data Gaps - Inadequate Understanding of Distribution or Range NA
American Beaver
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Fringed Myotis N4
Threat Impact
Data Gaps - Inadequate Understanding of Distribution or Range NA
Little Brown Myotis N3
Threat Impact
Brush Eradication / Vegetation Treatments Low
Wild Turkey R1
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Wild Turkey R1
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Mexican Spotted Owl N3
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Southwestern Willow Flycatcher N1
Threat Impact
Brush Eradication / Vegetation Treatments Medium
Welsh's Milkweed N1
Threat Impact
Data Gaps - Unknown Population Status Medium
Habitats
Habitat
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Agricultural Pollution Low
Riverine
Threat Impact
Brush Eradication / Vegetation Treatments Medium
Project Comments
Comment 01/07/2025 Type: 1 Commenter: Shaunna Goldberry
The Kanab Creek woody invasive mitigation project will also include creating intermittent snag patches for wildlife, particularly the Southwestern Willow Fly Catcher are you aware of protocols that we could utilize? References https://riversedgewest.org/sites/default/files/UDWR%20SWFL%20Tech%20Rep%2012-36.pdf
Comment 01/15/2025 Type: 1 Commenter: Shaunna Goldberry
Hello Alison, I received an operation error when attempting to upload a map. Are there file size limitations? I also have a presentation developed for stakeholders on completed treatments that include before and after images. This is also converted into a pdf. Thank you, Alison.
Comment 01/17/2025 Type: 1 Commenter: Mark Bigelow
Hey Shaunna or Jordan, this looks like another good riparian project. I would try to add a game animal or two. You could reach out to biologists in the area and discuss the project and how it could possibly improve habitat those game animals. That would get you some easy points that you are missing out on in the ranking process.
Comment 01/17/2025 Type: 1 Commenter: Shaunna Goldberry
Hello Mark, Thank you for the recommendation, I have a query in regards to habitat improvement for game animal habitat. There is a healthy presence of big game animals (deer primarily) within the boundaries of BF and Kanab Creek. Wouldn't the proposed improvements apply generally to Big Game habitat improvements? I will reach out to BLM biologists today. Thank you
Comment 01/17/2025 Type: 1 Commenter: Shaunna Goldberry
Providing a follow-through of effort and data gathering: Contacted but have not heard from Lisa Church BLM, Josie Habitat Biologist Utah DWR, and Jason Robinson Animal Biologist Utah DWR. Have researched on Wildlife Migration Initiative migratory evidence of mule deer through Best Friends Boundaries (upper reaches Kanab Creek) and of course Mule deer are a constant presence within the sanctuary boundaries. Thank you again for your feedback and direction.
Comment 01/31/2025 Type: 1 Commenter: Shaunna Goldberry
Additionally, met with Curtis Roundy Habitat Restoration Biologist who made several important recommendations about restoring the vigor of desiccated and dying sagebrush communities within Best Friends Animal Society acreage for the Paunsaugunt Mule Deer herd. The benefits would include range and rest for mothers and fauns. Increase the adult vigor of bucks to reach greater maturity due to the reduction of hunting stress and more viable supplemental habitat. Identified sites suitable for upland project opportunities within main BFAS boundaries and other parcels owned by BFAS. Discussed the benefit of restoring sage grouse habitat in BFAS Parcel 1 and creating a critical wintering sagebrush steppe that would increase the southernmost population of Sage Grouse in the continental US, in addition to buffering family groups' population losses during wintertime. Identified the reality of catastrophic fire events occurring within the BFAS current invasive stage of P & J within sagebrush communities. Lastly, identified fuel load reduction and Pansaugunt Mule Deer polygons areas within average owned by BFAS. Site discussions included: 1) Sensitivity to view scapes for a 3-5 year window of restoration and; 2) accessibility for wildlife viewing for BFAS visitors and staff; 3) Inclusion of significantly proportioned (distance) of P & J polygons for avian and other wildlife use. 4) Reseeding species, cost per acre, and application rates.
Comment 02/04/2025 Type: 1 Commenter: Judi Brawer
Shauna, this is such a fantastic project! And I greatly appreciate all of the effort and research you are doing! As to the recommendations from Curtis, are you thinking of adding those to your proposal here? Or will they be included in a future proposal?
Comment 02/06/2025 Type: 1 Commenter: Shaunna Goldberry
Hello Judi Thank you and here is our best answer. We had another field day (2/3/2025) with NRCS, BLM, FFSL, and Fish and Wildlife ground truthing treatment protocols for the grazing allotments and lower Kanab Creek restoration needs. In addition to evaluating the strategic BDA placements, and visiting beaver structures that were washed away in last year's microburst. The project is also awaiting funding decisions from NRCS and Fish and Wildlife. Hopefully, the upland improvements discussed with Curtis Roundy will be implemented next year.
Comment 01/13/2025 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Is this a proposal for the current year that we are half way through (FY2025) or was it suppose to be for FY26? I am assuming you meant for this to be a proposal for funding for FY26 which is the rounds that we just had a deadline for? If this is a proposal for FY26 please update the finance page with the correct year. Please also let me know so I know what list this needs to be on. Thanks.
Comment 01/15/2025 Type: 2 Commenter: Shaunna Goldberry
Hello Allison, Yes, this is for the 2026 year and I will change the finance page. Allison, Curtis advised that we could make adjustments for a few days. Is this window still open so that I can include a map that I received this evening. Thank you.
Completion
Start Date:
End Date:
FY Implemented:
Final Methods:
Project Narrative:
Future Management:
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
14892 Terrestrial Treatment Area Herbicide application Ground
14892 Terrestrial Treatment Area Planting/Transplanting Bareroot stock
14892 Terrestrial Treatment Area Vegetation removal / hand crew Cut Stump
14892 Terrestrial Treatment Area Vegetation removal / hand crew Lop and chip
Project Map
Project Map