Red Cliffs Reserve Fire Prevention Herbicide Application Phase II
Project ID: 7618
Status: Proposed
Fiscal Year: 2026
Submitted By: N/A
Project Manager: Curtis Roundy
PM Agency: Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
PM Office: Southern Region
Lead: Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
WRI Region: Southern
Description:
This project is a continuation of a project that started in 2022 to treat areas within the Red Cliffs Reserve with herbicide to prevent fire events from causing significant loss of habitat for Desert Tortoise due to fire.
Location:
The Red Cliffs Reserve Dersert Tortoise Preserve, in Washington County Utah on the West Side of I-15 From the North end of Quail Creek Reservoir to Cottonwood Springs Road.
Project Need
Need For Project:
Washington County contains the northernmost reach of habitat range for the federally listed desert tortoise species found in southwestern Utah. In 2020, the Turkey Farm Road Fire burned on and adjacent to this project area. Since the fire, there has been significant cheatgrass, and Sahara mustard invasion, suppressing the native plant community. Rejuvra has demonstrated control on cheatgrass in areas with intact vegetative communities and a strong release of those species has been observed as the cheatgrass suppression is removed. Likewise, Plateau has proven to be effective in controlling Sahara mustard populations allowing for the release of desirable understory components that exist. This project will use a tank mix of rejuvra and plateau on a large scale to release the vegetative communities from the cheatgrass and Sahara mustard suppression that exists within the fire scar, as well as within the understory of adjacent plant communities that have not been burned but still have significant amounts of cheatgrass in the understory. Invasive, fine textured fuels, primarily consisting of Sahara Mustard (Brassica tournefortii Gouan) Red Brome (Bromus rubens) and Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum), fueled a moderate to high intensity wildfire in the summer of 2020. The Turkey Farm Road fire consumed both the shrub canopy and understory vegetation. Soils within the burn are left exposed to wind, water erosion, and are now susceptible to invasion by noxious weeds and to the spread of cheatgrass and other non-native annual species. The soils within the fire area have been mapped and described as part of an official soil survey, completed by the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS). The Turkey Farm Road fire has been classified as "moderately susceptible" to fire damage for the most part indicating that the soil within the burn has features that are moderately favorable for damage to occur. This rating is also directly related to burn severity, which in this case was moderate to high. Therefore, soils within the burn site could be classified as "moderately" to "highly" susceptible for damage to occur after the fire. Based on these findings, past fire history in similar areas, and visits to the burned area, protecting the watershed values and reducing the erosion potential within wildlife habitat would be a priority for the Turkey Farm Road ESR project, and this project is a follow up to treatments that didn't happen in conjunction to the original project but is needed to achieve similar results to what was seen from these types of treatment in conjunction with the Turkey Farm Road ESR project. Additionally, containment and control of invasive, non-native species, such as cheatgrass, which may exacerbate erosion potential and fire frequency and severity that would further degrade habitat is also a very high priority. As fire is the number on cause for mortality on the Desert Tortoise we feel like these treatments are necessary for their protection. Also opening up Native open spaces like what should exist in the Mojave Desert Plant communities will allow for burrowing owls to feel more comfortable in making nests within these areas and make this their home. For these reasons we feel it is necessary to spray the herbicide rejuvra onto this site to help with cheatgrass infestations that have already begun and allow the native vegetation to have the competitive advantage. Specifically the proposal is to treat the remainder of the polygon within the fire scar that was mapped out during the last phase of this treatment, but was not treated due to increased cost in the chemicals as well as application of the chemicals due to inflation. This is an area that burned in the turkey farm fire and has shown good recovery, with native vegetation well on its way to re-establishing. Early evidence of cheatgrass and red brome re-introduction is also there and we desire to decrease its competition with the recovering native vegetation.
Objectives:
Restore native vegetation in T & E critical habitats. Maintain heathy ecosystems by rehabilitating habitats altered by fire. Reduce risk of non-native invasive species establishment. Release re-establishing native vegetation from competition from Sahara mustard cheatgrass and red brome. Remove cheatgrass and redbrome from intact native vegetation and reduce likelihood of future fires thereby protecting desert tortoise habitat. Reduce sedimentation and erosion by restoring a proper functioning Mohave Desert Plant community.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
If nothing is done to restore the habitat to optimal conditions there is risk that the habitat may become less desirable for the federally listed species and may possibly even become no longer be suitable. If this occurs further decline of the species is expected, and all efforts to avoid this decline in the species should be taken. Cheatgrass has high probability of returning and re-establishing before other plant species due to the nature of this annual grass. As this happens, other plant species struggle to re-establish, especially native plant species that are the most desirable in these Mohave Desert systems. When this happens the landscapes become dominated by cheatgrass, which is a fine fuel that is annually primed for increased fire intervals. If the area is not rehabilitated with the application of rejuvra or another cheatgrass control, it is expected that a pattern of more fires similar to the Turkey Farm Road Fire will continue to occur within the area. This will in turn result in additional soil loss due to runoff during storm events post fire. This silt and soil loss ends up in the Virgin River and has negative impacts the protected and endangered fish species. By controlling cheatgrass and the resulting fire cycles, we are in turn helping to protect and preserve future disturbances to the River System in which these fish live. Mojave Desert Tortoise are listed as threatened under the ESA and the biggest threat to their habitat is fire. Reduction of the return intervals of fire due to the increase of invasives like red brome and cheatgrass is critical to protecting Desert Tortoise and their habitat. It is important to learn how to rehabilitate burned areas to break that fire cycle as well as to protect unburned areas from moving into that cycle of increased frequency of fires. Washington County Habitat Conservation Plan's (HCP) Habitat Conservation Advisory Committee (HCAC) continues to support herbicide use as a tool for protection of desert tortoise habitat. During 2024, the HCP's Technical Committee (TC) created a 5-year Fuel & Fire Management Plan, which identified priority treatment areas within the Red Cliffs Desert Reserve/National Conservation Area (NCA). This plan ranked nine different potential treatment areas, and assigned a habitat value to each (low, medium, or high). A tentative treatment schedule was identified for these areas through 2030. While this plan identifies potential medium and high priority treatment areas of up to 8,100 acres, HCP management partners have since settled on a scaled-down approach that focuses on fuel breaks and treatment strips up to 100 meters wide. This strategy significantly reduces the total treatment acreages, and there are plans to amend the Fuels Plan to reflect that updated strategy. During late fall or early winter of 2025, Reserve management partners with Washington County, UDWR, and the BLM will focus on treatment areas identified as priority 1 for aerial applications. This may include areas within management Zones 2, 3, and 4 of the Red Cliffs Desert Reserve/NCA. Treatments are expected to focus on utility right-of-ways, Reserve boundary areas, and potentially areas adjacent to burn scars. Exact treatment acreage depends on funding received, but the minimum treatment size is expected to be 500 acres, with potential or up to 1,000 acres. The Zone 6 area (previously identified as priority 1) will not be prioritized for treatment in 2025. The treatment strategy identified here will be continuation of this winter's (January 2025) treatment plan of 456 acres of aerial applications in high priority areas within the Reserve. Also by allowing the native vegetation to re-establish in this area we are allowing for the natural runoff processes to occur and for more moist soils to exist within the reserve. These soils allow for refugia for the Gila Monster that is also native to this area, and relies on these micro-environments to fill its life cycle needs. Having native vegetation also allows the small animals like the black tailed jackrabbit and the desert cottontail to live here. Thriving populations of rabbit also benefit the predators that use this area like the kit fox, coyote, and bobcat by having prey species for them to hunt and forage on. Thank you for your support in funding this project in order to continue to strengthen the newly formed partnerships with BLM, UDWR, TNC, SITLA, Washington County, and Red Cliffs Reserve.
Relation To Management Plan:
This action is consistent with the following land use plans and the Normal Year Fire Management Plan. LUP Name: Red Cliffs National Conservation Area Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan (ROD/RMP). Date Approved December 2016. Other relevant Plans and associated NEPA analyses (copies available at BLM's St. George Field Office): Dixie Resource Area Draft Resource Management Plan and Draft Environmental Impact Statement; Oct. 1995, Dixie Resource Area Proposed Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement; Sept. 1998, Vegetation Treatment on BLM Lands in Thirteen Western States/FEIS; May, 1991 and associated ROD July, 1991 Vegetation PEIS ROD 2007 The Proposed Action is in conformance with the approved Red Cliffs National Conservation Area RMP/ROD because it is specifically provided for in the following management decisions: 6.6 Native Vegetation Communities Goal- Biodiversity, ecological integrity, and ecosystem resilience are conserved, protected, and restored in the unique native vegetation communities created by the convergence of the Mojave Desert, Great Basin, and Colorado Plateau ecoregions. VEG-4: Implement landscape-level fuel breaks and hazard fuel reduction projects in partnership with adjacent federal and state land managing agencies. VEG-5: Design fuel breaks and hazard fuel reduction projects to conserve and protect unburned native vegetation communities, evaluating factors such as vegetation types, seasonal wind direction, and expected fire behavior in project planning. VEG-6: Design fuel breaks to incorporate topographic features, water courses, major ephemeral drainages, road networks, and utility corridors, to minimize new surface disturbances and the loss of native vegetation. VEG-7: Design fuel breaks and hazard fuel reduction projects to utilize those methods that are environmentally sensitive and minimize new surface disturbances. VEG-9: Authorize the use of biological controls, targeted grazing, flaming, hand removal, herbicides, mechanical methods, or a combination of methods to develop fuel breaks and hazard fuel reduction projects (see Table 3 for descriptions of each method).* The project addresses threats to key habitats identified in the Utah Wildlife Action Plan as follows: a. Key Habitat- Aquatic Forested- Continuing the use of appropriate methods for reducing the spread and dominance of invasive weeds b. Key Habitat- Aquatic Shrub/Scrub- Continuing the use of appropriate methods for reducing the spread and dominance of invasive weeds c. Fire/Invasive Nonnative Plant Species- Conservation Action- Conduct upland vegetation treatments to restore characteristic upland vegetation, and reduce uncharacteristic fuel types and loadings. -Conduct riparian vegetation treatments to restore characteristic riparian vegetation, and reduce uncharacteristic fuel types and loadings. -Conduct post-fire rehabilitation, and control invasive Non Native Plant Species-
Fire / Fuels:
Cheatgrass known for its frequent fire cycles, and by slowing the spread of this invasive grass, you lessen the chance of a fire happening in this area. This project will reduce the risk of a wildfire. This project is an FRCC class 2 currently and by treating with the prescribed methods, we are hoping that it will move towards a FRCC class 1. This project is also going to protect several values at risk in the area including but not limited to the WUI interface with the adjacent community of Washington City transmission lines and infrastructure that runs around and through this corridor, as well as critical desert tortoise habitat protected through the Red Cliffs Desert Tortoise Reserve.
Water Quality/Quantity:
This project is located in the Upper Virgin River drainage where the natural flow of water runs through the town of St. George, Utah and eventually to Lake Mead, Nevada. This restoration project will stabilize the topsoil, prevent erosion and soil loss, and reduce negative water quality effects of the Virgin River due to silting and erosion. Establishing and supporting a healthy plant community is critical to reduce erosion and protect the Upper Virgin River Basin, and will, with a normal water absorption rate and normal precipitation in the area, serve to recharge the aquifer in a very arid desert location. Adding sediment into this system has negative impacts to the sensitive fish species like the Desert Sucker, Woundfin, Flannelmouth Sucker, and the Virgin Chub. So by treating this area and allowing it to function in its natural state we feel like we will be limiting the amount of sediment flows that happen and keeping sediment out of the Virgin River system. These water systems are prone to flash floods during precipitation events and burned areas contribute significantly to sedimentation in these flash events. Re-establishing and/or protecting areas of unburned habitat will help mitigate the sedimentation and erosion during these flash flood events.
Compliance:
Treatment will be occurring exclusively on state owned lands. There is also no ground disturbing activities planned. As such, there is no NEPA or Archeology component required prior to implementation. Rejuvra, which initially was marketed as Esplanade, was rebranded as Rejuvra due to a label change allowing for use in grazed areas making it available for a more broad use. This project will adhere to all chemical label recommendations for the soil type and the zone that it is being applied in.
Methods:
We plan to contract the application of the chemical to the site by means of helicopter application. DWR will contract with a company to purchase the chemical and apply it at the rate of 7oz in 7 gallons for the rejuvra and 6oz in 7 gallons of plateau per acre to control the cheatgrass, red brome, and Sahara mustard outbreak within the treatment area. It is anticipated that the application will take place after December 10th when the Desert Tortoise have burrowed for the winter so as to not negatively effect them during the chemical application process. The contractor who is hired will be given the latitude after that date to apply the chemical on the front edge of a storm system so as to maximize the effectiveness of the chemicals being used. By removing the cheatgrass and annual mustard from the plant community we feel like we will encourage a plant community that will lend itself to more use by species like Mule Deer and Desert Cottontail Rabbit. We have seen these specific species in the area in the past and feel like this work will help their life cycle immediately by allowing more palatable forage to grow in the area as well as in the long run break the fire frequency cycle that has been occurring in the area allowing for this area and the surrounding area to keep serving these species needs into the future.
Monitoring:
This treatment will be monitored each year for five years (2024-2028) and an annual monitoring summary report will be completed by early September each year. A number monitoring studies in conjunction with the BLM adjacent will be established.
Partners:
Extensive discussions have occurred with multiple partners in regards to this project. We have worked with SITLA on a similar project where we applied rejuvra on an unburned state section at T-Bone Mesa during the turkey farm fire rehab and seek to continue that partnership with protecting these other unburned or re-establishing state lands. We have also discussed the use of the same idea on BLM lands with BLM staff and while they are not yet authorized to conduct similar treatments, however they are excited about its use on state lands and are working toward authorization on BLM owned lands. Finally, Washington County has also been a good partner. They have been treating transmission corridors, trails, roads, and other right of ways in similar ways to protect from the risk of fires starting on these corridors and have committed money towards this project as well.
Future Management:
The decision of the RMP for the purpose of the Red Cliffs NCA is the following: To conserve, protect, and enhance for the benefit and enjoyment of present and future generations the ecological, scenic, wildlife, recreational, cultural, historical, natural, educational, and scientific resources of the National Conservation Area; and to protect each species that is located in the National Conservation Area; and listed as a threatened or endangered species on the list of threatened species or the list of endangered species published under... the Endangered Species Act of 1973. (OPLMA Section 1974 (a)) These are the goals and guides for the management of this areas presently and for the foreseeable future. Specifically, the NCA will be managed to enhance habitat for the desert tortoise. Promoting vegetation that is beneficial to provide forage and cover for this species is way management practice to accomplish this goal. Also establishing fire resistant and resilient plant species will help in the purpose of the Red Cliffs NCA. This is the management plan for the Red Cliffs NCA, and these SITLA and State Owned Lands are managed for the most part under the same management plan, with the exception that they are more flexible on the practices that are allowable and as such this is why we are able to use Rejuvra on these lands were they are currently prohibited on the Federal BLM lands that are part of the Red Cliffs NCA.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
The uses for this area are the following: To be a reserve for wildlife particularly for the threatened desert tortoise. To preserve cultural/historic sites. Also it is recreational area for public use with a trail system for biking, hiking, and horse back riding. Also this area is used by a migrating herd of Mule Deer, and although it is not hundreds of animals each year coming into this area there are seasonally deer that migrate into the area and spend their winters. Working to remove invasive species and create palatable browse species for these deer will benefit them and improve their fitness. As range land the area serves as a watershed resources when vegetation conditions are healthy and functioning. When soil erosion is mitigated and water from precipitation infiltrate's soil the range land is functioning properly.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$50,000.00 $0.00 $50,000.00 $25,500.00 $75,500.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Contractual Services Contract the application of herbicide on up to 1,000 acres within the Priority 1 mapped acreage area. @ $50/acre $50,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2026
Personal Services (permanent employee) In kind permanent employee time to develop and implement the project. $0.00 $0.00 $1,500.00 2026
Materials and Supplies Herbicide Chemicals to be mixed and applied to the treatment areas by a contractor. $0.00 $0.00 $24,000.00 2026
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$50,000.00 $0.00 $50,000.00 $25,500.00 $75,500.00
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
Washington County T306 Funds already received through an agreement $25,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2026
Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR) Permanent Employee time and incidentals to plan and implement project contract admin as well as planning and monitoring efforts. $0.00 $0.00 $1,500.00 2026
Washington County Herbicide purchased for the purpose of using it on polygons planned with the red cliffs NCA for fire prevention. $0.00 $0.00 $24,000.00 2026
Species Protection Account Remainder of the project funds to fully fund this project would be requested through UWRI and associated groups. $25,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2026
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Black-tailed Jackrabbit
Threat Impact
No Threat NA
Bobcat
Threat Impact
No Threat NA
Burrowing Owl N4
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Desert Cottontail R5
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Desert Cottontail R5
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Desert Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Desert Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Sediment Transport Imbalance High
Desert Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Storms and Flooding Very High
Desert Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Stormwater Runoff Low
Flannelmouth Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Flannelmouth Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Sediment Transport Imbalance Medium
Flannelmouth Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Storms and Flooding Medium
Gila Monster N4
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Very High
Gila Monster N4
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Very High
Gray Fox
Threat Impact
No Threat NA
Kit Fox N4
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Kit Fox N4
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Kit Fox N4
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Mojave Desert Tortoise N3
Threat Impact
Droughts Very High
Mojave Desert Tortoise N3
Threat Impact
Fire Suppression Tactics Low
Mojave Desert Tortoise N3
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Very High
Mojave Desert Tortoise N3
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Very High
Mojave Desert Tortoise N3
Threat Impact
Soil Erosion / Loss Low
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Virgin Chub N1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Virgin Chub N1
Threat Impact
Sediment Transport Imbalance High
Virgin Chub N1
Threat Impact
Storms and Flooding Very High
Virgin Chub N1
Threat Impact
Stormwater Runoff Medium
Woundfin N1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Woundfin N1
Threat Impact
Sand and Gravel Low
Woundfin N1
Threat Impact
Sediment Transport Imbalance High
Woundfin N1
Threat Impact
Storms and Flooding Very High
Woundfin N1
Threat Impact
Stormwater Runoff Medium
Habitats
Habitat
Desert Grassland
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Desert Grassland
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Desert Grassland
Threat Impact
Soil Erosion / Loss Medium
Mojave Desert Shrub
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Very High
Mojave Desert Shrub
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Very High
Mojave Desert Shrub
Threat Impact
Inadequate Restoration Tools or Methods NA
Project Comments
Comment 01/22/2025 Type: 1 Commenter: Stan Gurley
Curtis Another great project, using the newest tools in the watershed restoration tool box. Good job. One question/suggestion is to reach out to FFSL WUI Specialist to see if they are willing/able to help with funding or crossing boundaries to other landownerships. Keep up the good work!
Comment 02/13/2025 Type: 1 Commenter: Curtis Roundy
Stan thanks for the comment in support. In the future we will be sure to include the FFSL WUI Specialist in the planning to be sure to make these projects the best that they can be across land ownerships and be putting together projects that treat the landscape and not just the land owners properties.
Comment 02/03/2025 Type: 1 Commenter: Danielle Finlayson
Curtis - looks like another awesome project. Just wondering if you could include some wording as to how this will benefit things like burrowing owls, kit fox, etc. I know there has been some recent research on burrowing owls and cheat grass https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/10446/
Comment 02/13/2025 Type: 1 Commenter: Curtis Roundy
Danielle thanks for the comment. I will go back into the project details and add some language for the benefits to some of the listed species. I had help from the biologist over the Red Desert Reserve to decide what species to claim as benefitting. We will get some better descriptions as to how this work might be beneficial.
Comment 02/03/2025 Type: 1 Commenter: Kendall Bagley
Curtis, Great Project, moving forward a couple thoughts to consider are the HIG/F and SGCN Project Quality/Need/Benefit: This section is designed to elevate HIG/F and SGCN species project proposals should include at least a sentence or two for each species listed to receive full points for this section more points can be allocated to this section for HIG/F and SGCN, Quality/Need/Benefit. I didn't see information pertaining to several of the species listed, can you add additional information on these benefitted species? Thanks
Comment 02/13/2025 Type: 1 Commenter: Curtis Roundy
Kendall thanks for taking the time to review this project. I will go back into the project details section and add a description for each of the species listed. I had help from the Red Desert Reserve biologist on putting the species list together and must have not been clear to have needed how they would be affected to be discussed in the proposal. I will get it added.
Comment 02/05/2025 Type: 1 Commenter: Kevin Gunnell
Great project. It's not addressed in the writeup that I saw, but you mentioned in your presentation that you were leaving some areas untreated to leave some filaree/storkbill since tortoise are now using it in their diet. Instead of not treating those areas could you consider removing the Plateau and decreasing the rate of Rejuvra to 5 or 6 oz acre in those locations? This would likely shorten the control of annual grasses by 1 season in those areas, but would give continuity across the broader project to control of fine fuels and reduce areas of reinvasion of annual grasses while not removing the filaree/storksbill.
Comment 02/13/2025 Type: 1 Commenter: Curtis Roundy
Kevin thanks for taking the time to leave a comment on this project. We discussed these ideas in the planning, and as a collective group decided that control is more important than leaving forage options in the areas that were selected. The reason being that the number one cause of mortality to the Tortoise is fire. We planned the treatment areas to be in line with the areas that we felt were most likely to be ignition sources and then had treatment areas and leave islands so that the tortoise that were actively using the areas would still have forage options but that the continuity would be broken if fire were to happen. Also timing of the treatment makes it really difficult to not have the Plateau in the mix as we have committed to spraying only after the tortoise have burrowed in for the winter after December 10th. On most years this means that in these areas, there has already been some germination of the next years crop and if we took out the plateau it would cost us a year of control and if that happened to be the year of fire returning then we decided it was not worth the potential benefits of added forage. I hope this explanation helps to inform you of why the decision was made, and we as always appreciate any help and critique that will make our projects more successful.
Comment 02/13/2025 Type: 1 Commenter: Kevin Gunnell
Curtis, Thanks for a clarification on the rationale for the timing and inclusion of Plateau on the main proposed treatment area. I agree the mixture of Rejuvra + Plateau is the correct treatment for the proposed polygon as drawn and was not suggesting you change that. My suggestion was to do an additional Rejuvra only treatment on the currently untreated "leave" area's for tortoise forage. This could be fairly easily accomplished by having the contractor fly those areas first with a Rejuvra only mix (maybe reduce to 5-6 oz/acre to ensure filaree is not affected) and then add the Plateau for the larger general treatment as planned. As you stated, you would lose the first year control of annual grasses, but I see two advantages to adding this additional treatment. 1) Without treatment these leave areas will provide a substantial seed source of annual grasses for future reinvasion into the larger treatment. Even without the first year of control, there will likely be a 3-5 year control of annual grasses in a Rejuvra only treatment that will reduce the seed source and likely prolong the threat of reinvasion into the larger project. 2) The release from competition will likely allow for an increase in forage production of filaree and other species that will support the tortoise needs. If an additional Rejuvra only treatment is not optional in these areas this is still a great project that I fully support. Thanks.
Completion
Start Date:
End Date:
FY Implemented:
Final Methods:
Project Narrative:
Future Management:
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
14765 Terrestrial Treatment Area Herbicide application Aerial (helicopter)
Project Map
Project Map