Skip to Content
Main Menu
Search
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Projects
Maps
About Us
Register
Login
Search
Saving...
Thank you for requesting access to WRI.
An administrator will contact you with further details.
Ophir Fire Rehabilitation Project
Region: Central
ID: 2472
Project Status: Completed
Map This Project
Export Project Data
Project Details
*
Need for Project
The Ophir fire burned approximately 1,568 acres on the west side of Rush valley, west of highway 73. About half of the fire burned on SITLA lands and the other half burned on the Tooele Army Depot, south area. This area is classified as occupied sage grouse habitat and sage grouse winter habitat. The area is also classified as crucial pronghorn year long habitat. In addition, mule deer use this area during some winters. This area is becoming increasingly dominated by cheatgrass after wildfires. If the burn areas are not seeded, cheatgrass will increase and cause an increase in fire frequency and a reduction in sagebrush habitat in Rush valley.
Provide evidence about the nature of the problem and the need to address it. Identify the significance of the problem using a variety of data sources. For example, if a habitat restoration project is being proposed to benefit greater sage-grouse, describe the existing plant community characteristics that limit habitat value for greater sage-grouse and identify the changes needed for habitat improvement.
*
Objectives
Control cheatgrass in the burn area for at least 2 growing seasons to a cover value of less than 5%. Establish perennial grass cover to a value of 12% by the 3rd growing season. Establish forage kochia to a density of at least 500 plants/acre
Provide an overall goal for the project and then provide clear, specific and measurable objectives (outcomes) to be accomplished by the proposed actions. If possible, tie to one or more of the public benefits UWRI is providing.
*
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?)
Lack of treatment will allow an increase in cheatgrass cover and an increased possibility of future wildfires.
LOCATION: Justify the proposed location of this project over other areas, include publicly scrutinized planning/recovery documents that list this area as a priority, remote sensing modeling that show this area is a good candidate for restoration, wildlife migration information and other data that help justify this project's location.
TIMING: Justify why this project should be implemented at this time. For example, Is the project area at risk of crossing an ecological or other threshold wherein future restoration would become more difficult, cost prohibitive, or even impossible.
*
Relation to Management Plans
The project area occurs within the sagebrush steppe type which is one of the key habitats identified in the WAP. This area supports mule deer (Tier III). Numerous other species of concern (Tier III) also inhabit the area including neotropical birds and raptors. 1. The proposed project will help address some of the goals and objectives of the UTAH DIVISION OF WILDLIFE RESOURCES STATEWIDE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR MULE DEER. Habitat Goal: Conserve and improve mule deer habitat throughout the state with emphasis on critical mule deer ranges. Habitat Objective 1. Maintain mule deer habitat throughout the state by protecting existing critical habitats and mitigating for losses due to human impacts. Strategies: Work with land management agencies and private landowners to recognize and properly manage critical mule deer habitats, especially fawning and wintering areas. Habitat Objective 2. Improve the quality of forage and vegetation for mule deer Strategies: Initiate broad scale vegetative treatment projects to improve mule deer habitat with emphasis on sagebrush winter ranges. 2. The proposed project will address some of the habitat management strategies outlined in the deer management plan for herd unit 18 Oquirrh - Stansbury including: continue to restore and improve sagebrush steppe habitats critical to deer according to DWR’s Habitat Initiative; cooperate with federal land management agencies and private landowners in carrying out habitat improvements such as reseedings, controlled burns, water developments etc. on public and private lands; and maintain and/or enhance forage production through direct range improvements throughout the unit to achieve population management objectives. 3. The proposed projects will address the following goals and objectives of the Division of Wildlife Resources most recent strategic management plan: Resource Goal: expand wildlife populations and conserve sensitive species by protecting and improving wildlife habitat. Objective 1: protect existing wildlife habitat and improve 500,000 acres of critical habitats and watersheds throughout the state by 2011. Objective 2: Increase fish and game populations to meet management plan objectives and expand quality fishing and hunting opportunities. 4. The proposed treatments will help address strategies outlined in the WDARM sage grouse conservation plan; Reduce the threat of conversion of sagebrush stands to invasive/noxious weed communities. Work with public and private partners to implement livestock management plans that address seasonal needs of sage-grouse and livestock operations. By 2016, increase brood-rearing habitat quality in the Resource Area.
List management plans where this project will address an objective or strategy in the plan. Describe how the project area overlaps the objective or strategy in the plan and the relevance of the project to the successful implementation of those plans. It is best to provide this information in a list format with the description immediately following the plan objective or strategy.
*
Fire/Fuels
If applicable, detail how the proposed project will significantly reduce the risk of fuel loading and/or continuity of hazardous fuels including the use of fire-wise species in re-seeding operations. Describe the value of any features being protected by reducing the risk of fire. Values may include; communities at risk, permanent infrastructure, municipal watersheds, campgrounds, critical wildlife habitat, etc. Include the size of the area where fuels are being reduced and the distance from the feature(s) at risk.
*
Water Quality/Quantity
Describe how the project has the potential to improve water quality and/or increase water quantity, both over the short and long term. Address run-off, erosion, soil infiltration, and flooding, if applicable.
*
Compliance
2 PMArchaeology, No ground disturbance planned on SITLA land, Aug 9 2012 / 6 NEPA, Not required, Aug 15 2012
Description of efforts, both completed and planned, to bring the proposed action into compliance with any and all cultural resource, NEPA, ESA, etc. requirements. If compliance is not required enter "not applicable" and explain why not it is not required.
*
Methods
Plateau herbicide will be applied to 758 acres of SITLA lands by fixed wing aircraft during the fall of 2012. About 439 acres of Tooele Army Depot land will be ground sprayed with Plateau herbicide. Desirable perennial grasses, forbs and shrubs will be drill seeded on military and private lands in October and November. Forage kochia and some perennial grass seed will be applied by fixed wing aircraft in February of 2013.
Describe the actions, activities, tasks to be implemented as part of the proposed project; how these activities will be carried out, equipment to be used, when, and by whom.
*
Monitoring
Photo points will be established on SITLA and Depot property.
Describe plans to monitor for project success and achievement of stated objectives. Include details on type of monitoring (vegetation, wildlife, etc.), schedule, assignments and how the results of these monitoring efforts will be reported and/or uploaded to this project page. If needed, upload detailed plans in the "attachments" section.
*
Partners
List any and all partners (agencies, organizations, NGO's, private landowners) that support the proposal and/or have been contacted and included in the planning and design of the proposed project. Describe efforts to gather input and include these agencies, landowners, permitees, sportsman groups, researchers, etc. that may be interested/affected by the proposed project. Partners do not have to provide funding or in-kind services to a project to be listed.
*
Future Management
The treatment areas will be rested from grazing for at least 2 growing seasons.
Detail future methods or techniques (including administrative actions) that will be implemented to help in accomplishing the stated objectives and to insure the long term success/stability of the proposed project. This may include: post-treatment grazing rest and/or management plans/changes, wildlife herd/species management plan changes, ranch plans, conservation easements or other permanent protection plans, resource management plans, forest plans, etc.
*
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources
Potential for the proposed action to improve quality or quantity of sustainable uses such as grazing, timber harvest, biomass utilization, recreation, etc. Grazing improvements may include actions to improve forage availability and/or distribution of livestock.
Title Page
Project Details
Finance
Species
Habitats
Seed
Comments
Images/Documents
Completion Form
Project Summary Report