Skip to Content
Main Menu
Search
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Projects
Maps
About Us
Register
Login
Search
Saving...
Thank you for requesting access to WRI.
An administrator will contact you with further details.
Pelican Lake Habitat Structures (Phase I)
Region: Northeastern
ID: 3689
Project Status: Cancelled
Map This Project
Export Project Data
Project Details
*
Need for Project
Pelican Lake has been historically known for its ability to grow large bluegill and also be a quality bass fishery. It is an important fishery to the Uintah Basin and can produce both family style fishing and a "trophy" style fishing for both species of fish. During a recent Pelican Lake management team meeting the installation of in-lake habitat structures as fish attractors was discussed and added as a goal for improvement within the newly written plan. Pelican lake is a shallow irrigation lake with a max depth of 16-17 feet. The bottom of the lake historically was covered with aquatic vegetation. Since the invasion of carp started in 2009, vegetation has been uprooted and scattered leaving a muddy, mucky bottom with no habitat for macroinvertabrates or fish. The lake currently has sufficient "outter" boundary cover bullrush and cattails, but severely lacks cover on the interior of the lake itself. Phase I of this project would be to install simple and cost effective structures within the middle of the lake and near the fishing pier to act as fish attractors and bring both bass and bluegill into areas where previous aquatic vegetation is now gone.
Provide evidence about the nature of the problem and the need to address it. Identify the significance of the problem using a variety of data sources. For example, if a habitat restoration project is being proposed to benefit greater sage-grouse, describe the existing plant community characteristics that limit habitat value for greater sage-grouse and identify the changes needed for habitat improvement.
*
Objectives
1) Complete a habitat structure master plan for Pelican Lake using multiple phases to create and install in-lake habitat structures over time. 2) Install habitat structures in 2-3 areas within the lake in FY 2017 utilizing the help of angler groups and sister agencies such as the BOR and BLM. 3) Evaluate the effectiveness of these in-lake structures over time using underwater cameras, angler information and sampling methods. 4) Continue this project into multiple phases to address sedimentation issues we are seeing along the inlet canal on the north end of the lake. With the help of an engineer, design structures that will reduce sediment and decrease turbidity within Pelican Lake.
Provide an overall goal for the project and then provide clear, specific and measurable objectives (outcomes) to be accomplished by the proposed actions. If possible, tie to one or more of the public benefits UWRI is providing.
*
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?)
Installation of these in-lake habitat structures through multiple phases of this project will help to reduce sedimentation and turbidity within the lake. If we are not successful in reducing sediment load and turbidity within this system we will never be able to restore Pelican Lake and return it back to the incredible fishery it once was. This project is the very first step of many to reduce the turbidity within this lake.
LOCATION: Justify the proposed location of this project over other areas, include publicly scrutinized planning/recovery documents that list this area as a priority, remote sensing modeling that show this area is a good candidate for restoration, wildlife migration information and other data that help justify this project's location.
TIMING: Justify why this project should be implemented at this time. For example, Is the project area at risk of crossing an ecological or other threshold wherein future restoration would become more difficult, cost prohibitive, or even impossible.
*
Relation to Management Plans
Directly related to the Pelican Lake Management Plan (First draft March 2016), which lists Improving water quality and improving fish habitat within the lake as goals #1 and #4.
List management plans where this project will address an objective or strategy in the plan. Describe how the project area overlaps the objective or strategy in the plan and the relevance of the project to the successful implementation of those plans. It is best to provide this information in a list format with the description immediately following the plan objective or strategy.
*
Fire/Fuels
N/A
If applicable, detail how the proposed project will significantly reduce the risk of fuel loading and/or continuity of hazardous fuels including the use of fire-wise species in re-seeding operations. Describe the value of any features being protected by reducing the risk of fire. Values may include; communities at risk, permanent infrastructure, municipal watersheds, campgrounds, critical wildlife habitat, etc. Include the size of the area where fuels are being reduced and the distance from the feature(s) at risk.
*
Water Quality/Quantity
Over multiple phases would aim to directly benefit water quality over time. Reduction in sediment accumulation of the north end of the lake and decreasing turbidity caused by wave action and flood events within the system.
Describe how the project has the potential to improve water quality and/or increase water quantity, both over the short and long term. Address run-off, erosion, soil infiltration, and flooding, if applicable.
*
Compliance
BOR and Water Conservancy district by-in to the project. BOR has initially given us the OK stating that Pelican Lake has no outlet work or critical BOR managed structures that could be impacted. Also stated was the need to mark structure areas and make sure structures are deep enough to not cause harm to people or equipment.
Description of efforts, both completed and planned, to bring the proposed action into compliance with any and all cultural resource, NEPA, ESA, etc. requirements. If compliance is not required enter "not applicable" and explain why not it is not required.
*
Methods
1) Create a master plan and map of areas to install these structures. 2) Acquire woody material needed to build these structures 3) Utilize multiple resources to assist in installation of these structures 4) Evalutate effectiveness
Describe the actions, activities, tasks to be implemented as part of the proposed project; how these activities will be carried out, equipment to be used, when, and by whom.
*
Monitoring
A monitoring plan for these structures would include the use of underwater camera, scuba or snorkeling surveys and the use of boat electrofishing to gather use data. We would also want to utilize anglers to determine effectiveness of these structures.
Describe plans to monitor for project success and achievement of stated objectives. Include details on type of monitoring (vegetation, wildlife, etc.), schedule, assignments and how the results of these monitoring efforts will be reported and/or uploaded to this project page. If needed, upload detailed plans in the "attachments" section.
*
Partners
UDWR biologists have spoken with the BLM and plan to work together on construction and installation of these structures. We will collaborate in future phases to utilize available funding sources and partner on this and other Pelican Lake projects.
List any and all partners (agencies, organizations, NGO's, private landowners) that support the proposal and/or have been contacted and included in the planning and design of the proposed project. Describe efforts to gather input and include these agencies, landowners, permitees, sportsman groups, researchers, etc. that may be interested/affected by the proposed project. Partners do not have to provide funding or in-kind services to a project to be listed.
*
Future Management
Future management will follow the newly created Pelican Lake Management plan with efforts directed to "restore" the historical Pelican Lake of the 1970-1980's. Quality Bluegill and Largemouth bass are key to this projects success.
Detail future methods or techniques (including administrative actions) that will be implemented to help in accomplishing the stated objectives and to insure the long term success/stability of the proposed project. This may include: post-treatment grazing rest and/or management plans/changes, wildlife herd/species management plan changes, ranch plans, conservation easements or other permanent protection plans, resource management plans, forest plans, etc.
*
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources
N/A
Potential for the proposed action to improve quality or quantity of sustainable uses such as grazing, timber harvest, biomass utilization, recreation, etc. Grazing improvements may include actions to improve forage availability and/or distribution of livestock.
Title Page
Project Details
Finance
Species
Habitats
Seed
Comments
Images/Documents
Project Summary Report