Skip to Content
Main Menu
Search
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Projects
Maps
About Us
Register
Login
Search
Saving...
Thank you for requesting access to WRI.
An administrator will contact you with further details.
Stansbury Mountain Catestrophic Fire Juniper Removal and Seeding
Region: Central
ID: 3917
Project Status: Completed
Map This Project
Export Project Data
Project Details
*
Need for Project
The foothills of the eastern Stansbury range have experienced a tremendous amount of pinyon/juniper (PJ) encroachment in the last century and was subsequently designated as a priority area of concern for incidence of catastrophic wild fire by the Utah Division of Forestry, Fires and State Lands Wasatch regional work group. The FFSL identified 178,453 acres of eastern Stansbury Mountains as a priority area for fuel reduction. In 2015 Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack announced that Utah would receive $1.1 million through an RCPP grant to reduce the size intensity and frequency of catastrophic fire. Soon afterwards, Grantsville Conservation District facilitated discussions between FFSL, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Utah Division of Natural Resources, GIP and land owners to encourage participation in a catastrophic fire project. From this partnership, $1,306,299 in grants were submitted and almost all was approved to reduce the fuel load on the Stansbury foothills. This amount will only treat 3,556 of the 178,453 acres. Proposals include reducing fuel load (PJ) by at least 80%; increasing perennial herbaceous cover to 15%; reduce the threat of fire from high/extreme to low/moderate; reduce fire suppression difficulty from extreme to moderate or less; improve livestock management and distribution using fencing and water.
Provide evidence about the nature of the problem and the need to address it. Identify the significance of the problem using a variety of data sources. For example, if a habitat restoration project is being proposed to benefit greater sage-grouse, describe the existing plant community characteristics that limit habitat value for greater sage-grouse and identify the changes needed for habitat improvement.
*
Objectives
1. Reduce fuels and fire risk 2. Reduce exotic weeds 3. Increase native species biodiversity 4. Increase native animal habitat 5. Make it possible to establish an extra grazing pasture that will support proper grazing regime 5. Increase pasture AUMs
Provide an overall goal for the project and then provide clear, specific and measurable objectives (outcomes) to be accomplished by the proposed actions. If possible, tie to one or more of the public benefits UWRI is providing.
*
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?)
1. Fire - there is an elevated risk of fire in the project area from both Juniper and cheatgrass fuels 2. Invasive species - there are both listed noxious weeds and cheatgrass established within the project area. Weeds are already starting to degrade the habitat and increase the risk of fire. With continued establishment there is also a risk of community turn over from native to exotic. 3. Juniper invasion - in about 500 acres of the project area there young juniper trees are establishing within a sagebrush habitat. If this area is not treated the sagebrush habitat with threatened with being turned into a Juniper habitat, which will increase the fire risk and decrease biodiversity.
LOCATION: Justify the proposed location of this project over other areas, include publicly scrutinized planning/recovery documents that list this area as a priority, remote sensing modeling that show this area is a good candidate for restoration, wildlife migration information and other data that help justify this project's location.
TIMING: Justify why this project should be implemented at this time. For example, Is the project area at risk of crossing an ecological or other threshold wherein future restoration would become more difficult, cost prohibitive, or even impossible.
*
Relation to Management Plans
With the EQIP contract prescribed grazing management will be established along with a conservation plan that will adhere to practice standards, along the guidelines of the SITLA grazing management plans and standards.
List management plans where this project will address an objective or strategy in the plan. Describe how the project area overlaps the objective or strategy in the plan and the relevance of the project to the successful implementation of those plans. It is best to provide this information in a list format with the description immediately following the plan objective or strategy.
*
Fire/Fuels
Fuel reduction is one of the main objectives of this projects. In Phase 1, there is 300 acres of treatable mature juniper that will be removed with a 2 way chaining and reseed with a mixture of native and introduced grasses, forbs and shrubs. There is also another 280 acres of juniper establishing into sagebrush habitat that will lopped and scattered. Phase 2 removes 600 acres of mature juniper.
If applicable, detail how the proposed project will significantly reduce the risk of fuel loading and/or continuity of hazardous fuels including the use of fire-wise species in re-seeding operations. Describe the value of any features being protected by reducing the risk of fire. Values may include; communities at risk, permanent infrastructure, municipal watersheds, campgrounds, critical wildlife habitat, etc. Include the size of the area where fuels are being reduced and the distance from the feature(s) at risk.
*
Water Quality/Quantity
Juniper stands release larger sediment loads during storm events as compared to other habitats; converting a juniper stand to a grassland can reduce the sediment load from a 25-year storm event by 75% (http://juniper.oregonstate.edu/EC1417.pdf). Reducing sediment load from storm events will improve water quality and decrease soil erosion. Juniper also uses large quantities of water, which is used to out complete other vegetation. Removing juniper would release that competition, increasing the amount of available water in the soil. (http://juniper.oregonstate.edu/EC1417.pdf)
Describe how the project has the potential to improve water quality and/or increase water quantity, both over the short and long term. Address run-off, erosion, soil infiltration, and flooding, if applicable.
*
Compliance
As part of the planning process with an EQIP application NEPA is completed within the SCA-52 of the NRCS document. The project manager will coordinate with the NRCS staff archaeologist to complete the appropriate archaeological clearance. This is also required for the UCC State funding used at the project site.
Description of efforts, both completed and planned, to bring the proposed action into compliance with any and all cultural resource, NEPA, ESA, etc. requirements. If compliance is not required enter "not applicable" and explain why not it is not required.
*
Methods
- Young juniper invasion - Lop and scatter contracted out by the permittee - Fall 2017 - Aerial herbicide treatment in field 5 and 2- helicopter aerial application of herbicide contracted out by permittee - Fall 2017 and Spring 2018 - Juniper stand removal in field 5- Two-way chaining completed by the permittee - March 2018 - Fence building - completed by permittee September 2017 - Aerial seed application in field 5- helicopter aerial application contracted out by permittee - October and December 2018 - Field 5 will be rested for two growing seasons - In Fall of 2019 field 5 will be grazed and Field 4 will be closed to grazing and 2 way chained for juniper - Fall 2021 all fields will be grazed and rest/rotational grazing will be implemented
Describe the actions, activities, tasks to be implemented as part of the proposed project; how these activities will be carried out, equipment to be used, when, and by whom.
*
Monitoring
Quantitative and qualitative monitoring will be conducted in spring 2017, before any treatment starts, in spring 2018, during treatment, spring 2019, 2020 and 20201, after treatment. Plots will be established in the mature juniper stand, cheatgrass stand, juniper invasion stand and in a control. Plant species diversity, abundance, cover and frequency will be taken, as well as, AUM and range condition scores. Photo plots will also be established in each plot.
Describe plans to monitor for project success and achievement of stated objectives. Include details on type of monitoring (vegetation, wildlife, etc.), schedule, assignments and how the results of these monitoring efforts will be reported and/or uploaded to this project page. If needed, upload detailed plans in the "attachments" section.
*
Partners
Utah Department of Agriculture and Food (funding and planning) - Natural Resource Conservation Service - (funding and planning) - Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration (landowner) - Hunt Ranch LLC (permittee) - Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (consultant) -
List any and all partners (agencies, organizations, NGO's, private landowners) that support the proposal and/or have been contacted and included in the planning and design of the proposed project. Describe efforts to gather input and include these agencies, landowners, permitees, sportsman groups, researchers, etc. that may be interested/affected by the proposed project. Partners do not have to provide funding or in-kind services to a project to be listed.
*
Future Management
One of the objectives of this project is to create pastures that will enable the permittee to implement a rotational grazing schedule that will allow a pasture a year's rest. SITLA and the permittee have agreed to incorporate this as part of their grazing management plan, which SITLA is responsible to enforce.
Detail future methods or techniques (including administrative actions) that will be implemented to help in accomplishing the stated objectives and to insure the long term success/stability of the proposed project. This may include: post-treatment grazing rest and/or management plans/changes, wildlife herd/species management plan changes, ranch plans, conservation easements or other permanent protection plans, resource management plans, forest plans, etc.
*
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources
This project area is grazed. Currently the Utah State GIP program is helping the permittee to install a fence and another fence will be installed with the funding of the EQIP application, resting a 5 pasture grazing system. The fifth pasture is mostly cover with a mature juniper stand that does not provide enough forage to be able to support grazing within that pasture. With juniper removal and reseeding the fifth pasture will be able to be grazed, which will create a grazing rotational schedule that will allow one pasture to rest for a year. This will increase the AUM's as well as rangeland health that will increase long term sustained grazing.
Potential for the proposed action to improve quality or quantity of sustainable uses such as grazing, timber harvest, biomass utilization, recreation, etc. Grazing improvements may include actions to improve forage availability and/or distribution of livestock.
Title Page
Project Details
Finance
Species
Habitats
Seed
Comments
Images/Documents
Completion Form
Project Summary Report