Skip to Content
Main Menu
Search
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Projects
Maps
About Us
Register
Login
Search
Saving...
Thank you for requesting access to WRI.
An administrator will contact you with further details.
Poverty Flat Herbicide and Shrub Reseeding Project
Region: Southern
ID: 4060
Project Status: Completed
Map This Project
Export Project Data
Project Details
*
Need for Project
The purpose of this project will be to re-introduce shrubs back into this area that will support mule deer use. Reduction of quality forage has declined due to the invasion of cheatgrass on the site, causing the natural perennial vegetation to be chocked out and become non-productive, some grasses and fobs exist but the lack of browse species is gone. We would like to reseed this area in hopes of re-establishment of mainly shrub species such as Wyoming Sage Brush and Fourwing saltbush, this area is critical to winter mule deer on the Monroe Mountain Unit and we are lacking in the key shrub component that can and will support the mule deer during critical winter months. Shrubs are key to provide critical forage for winter Big Game animals along the Poverty Flat Area.
Provide evidence about the nature of the problem and the need to address it. Identify the significance of the problem using a variety of data sources. For example, if a habitat restoration project is being proposed to benefit greater sage-grouse, describe the existing plant community characteristics that limit habitat value for greater sage-grouse and identify the changes needed for habitat improvement.
*
Objectives
Objective of this project is to re-establish critical grass, forb and shrubs that will play A major role in over wintering Big Game animals in this area. The treatment site does not have a good diversity of plant and shrub species available at this time. Objectives are to use a herbicide to control the cheat grass, then reseed the area with forbs, grasses and shrubs that will help sustain wildlife in the fall and spring. This area is critical for UDWR, as we have several hundred mule deer and elk that use this area in the fall and spring, with no available forage on site the deer and elk find their way in to croplands and cause damage to agriculture fields. UDWR objective is to re-establish the winter type forage shrub component that will help sustain the deer and elk away from the agriculture cropland and reduce depredation issues.
Provide an overall goal for the project and then provide clear, specific and measurable objectives (outcomes) to be accomplished by the proposed actions. If possible, tie to one or more of the public benefits UWRI is providing.
*
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?)
The threats and risks of doing this treatment consist of additional invasion of cheatgrass on the landscape, reduction of native and introduce grass and shrub species along with the decline of forbes during critical times of year. This project is in a critical site location, it is a spring/winter high use area and will benefit several hundred deer and elk on the Monroe Mountain Herd Unit, deer populations are increasing and the need to complete this project to sustain the deer and elk populations is a must. The risk is that the seeding will not become established, due to possible drought, low moisture (rain or snow at critical time of the year), the on going invasion of cheat grass allowing the seeded species to mature and become established on site.
LOCATION: Justify the proposed location of this project over other areas, include publicly scrutinized planning/recovery documents that list this area as a priority, remote sensing modeling that show this area is a good candidate for restoration, wildlife migration information and other data that help justify this project's location.
TIMING: Justify why this project should be implemented at this time. For example, Is the project area at risk of crossing an ecological or other threshold wherein future restoration would become more difficult, cost prohibitive, or even impossible.
*
Relation to Management Plans
The pinyon-juniper and big sagebrush areas lie within the sagebrush steppe type which is one of the key habitats identified in the WAP. The proposed projects will address some of the habitat management strategies outlined in the deer and elk management plans for herd unit 23 (Monroe Unit) including: Continue to improve and restore sagebrush steppe habitats critical to deer according to UDWRs Habitat Initiative. Maintain habitat quantity and quality at a level adequate to support the stated population objectives while at the same time not resulting in an overall downward trend in range condition and watershed quality. Work cooperatively with land management agencies and private landowners to plan and implement improvement projects for the purpose of enhancing wildlife habitat and range resources in general. *The project also helps fulfill the state mule deer management plan section IV Habitat Goal: Conserve and improve mule deer habitat throughout the state with emphasis on crucial ranges. *The proposed projects will address the following goals and objectives of the Division of Wildlife Resources most recent strategic management plan: Resource Goal: expand wildlife populations and conserve sensitive species by protecting and improving wildlife habitat. Objective 1: protect existing wildlife habitat and improve 500,000 acres of critical habitats and watersheds throughout the state. Objective 3: conserve sensitive species to prevent them from becoming listed as threatened or endangered. Constituency Goal: Achieve broad-based support for Division programs and budgets by demonstrating the value of wildlife to all citizens of Utah. Objective 2: improve communication with wildlife organizations, public officials, private landowners, and government agencies to obtain support for Division programs. *UDWR SR critical big game winter range are important browse communities that need to be enhanced and improved. The Division will employ a variety of methods to achieve this including prescribed grazing, prescribed burning, reseeding and seedling transplants, also mechanical treatments. Priority areas will include sagebrush-steppe and mountain browse communities. Falls within the rangeland focus area for WRI wildlife species for mule deer and elk. *NRCS has also identified that the sagebrush steppe is critical as it pertains to wildlife species on Private, State and Federal Lands. *Richfield Field Office RMP - Manage for a mix of vegetative types, structural stages, and provide for native plant, fish, and wildlife (including SSS) habitats. - Sustain or reestablish the integrity of the sagebrush continuity, and quality of habitat that is necessary to maintain sustainable populations of sagebrush-dependent wildlife species. rough habitat restoration practices. -Increase 50,000 acres annually through management actions (prescribed grazing, invasive weed control)
List management plans where this project will address an objective or strategy in the plan. Describe how the project area overlaps the objective or strategy in the plan and the relevance of the project to the successful implementation of those plans. It is best to provide this information in a list format with the description immediately following the plan objective or strategy.
*
Fire/Fuels
Fire will continue to play a major role in this are of Poverty Flat, in the past this areas has burned and it has become over run with invasive weed species such as cheat grass. The need for this treatment is to plant and establish native and no-native grass and forb species along with shrubs that will out complete cheat grass invasion. Fuels such as cheat grass play a major role in fire and fuel loading in our area and the need to reduce the cheatgrass is critical. Re-establishment of perennial grasses will allow for less fuels as our restoration efforts have shown that when a fire burns into an area that is healthy with good grass and forb understory the seeded species can slow the spread of the fire and reduce the impacted areas of the wildfire.
If applicable, detail how the proposed project will significantly reduce the risk of fuel loading and/or continuity of hazardous fuels including the use of fire-wise species in re-seeding operations. Describe the value of any features being protected by reducing the risk of fire. Values may include; communities at risk, permanent infrastructure, municipal watersheds, campgrounds, critical wildlife habitat, etc. Include the size of the area where fuels are being reduced and the distance from the feature(s) at risk.
*
Water Quality/Quantity
Water quality and quantity will be increased due the the reduction of overland flow of water as it hits the soil by protecting perennial grasses, forbs and shrubs the water will be better utilized and the benefit will increase the quality of the rangeland goals and objectives. As the treatment area sits now the invasive weed species are taking over the site and reducing the water intake to the small amount of native grass species on site. After the treatment we would expect to see improvement of our seeded species utilizing the rain and winter snow load more effective with less bare soil to cause increasing evaporation of the moisture we receive on site. Reduction of erosion due to bare soil and rock in the area will be replaced by shrubs and increased perennial grasses which will help reduce evaporation and loss of critical water in this soil type and Ecological Site.
Describe how the project has the potential to improve water quality and/or increase water quantity, both over the short and long term. Address run-off, erosion, soil infiltration, and flooding, if applicable.
*
Compliance
This treatment site has been reseeded in the past and the area has been disturbed with rangeland type equipment (drill, hand planting, etc.). Project manager will work with UDWR Archaeologist to make sure this is correct before proceeding.
Description of efforts, both completed and planned, to bring the proposed action into compliance with any and all cultural resource, NEPA, ESA, etc. requirements. If compliance is not required enter "not applicable" and explain why not it is not required.
*
Methods
Project will consist of a Herbicide Treatment of Plateau to be aerially applied with the means of a helicopter, after the herbicide treatment, the area will be reseeded with shrubs through the use of a Rangeland Drill pulled with a tractor along with hand planting some bare root or containerized Wyoming Sagebrush Stock. The efforts of the Plateau Treatment will hold back or suppress the cheatgrass allowing for the established grasses and the new shrub plantings to take hold and continue to out compete the cheatgrass. Additional support of the hand plantings maybe assisted through local youth groups, Conservation Sportsman's Groups or Dedicated Hunters from the surrounding area.
Describe the actions, activities, tasks to be implemented as part of the proposed project; how these activities will be carried out, equipment to be used, when, and by whom.
*
Monitoring
Monitoring of the project will consist of photo points along with a established range site put in by UDWR, big game classifications by the Area Biologist for mule deer in the spring and fall. This site will be monitored closely due to the fact that more areas of this Poverty Flat is in decline of the winter shrub components that will benefit mule deer. Other areas to be looked at will be adjacent properties associated with the BLM and Private Property. The possibilities of the GBRC Range Trend Program may be helpful in setting a permanent site to be monitored over time to collect data in the future.
Describe plans to monitor for project success and achievement of stated objectives. Include details on type of monitoring (vegetation, wildlife, etc.), schedule, assignments and how the results of these monitoring efforts will be reported and/or uploaded to this project page. If needed, upload detailed plans in the "attachments" section.
*
Partners
UDWR BLM SITLA Private Local Sportsman Groups such as: Mule Deer Foundation Utah Bowman's Association Sportsman for Fish and Wildlife In the past we have looked at this area with the BLM in trying to come up with ideas and treatments that will benefit this critical mule deer range. Both UDWR and BLM are in agreement that we must do something to produce additional shrubs and forage value for mule deer. We are looking to take on this project in hopes of learning what can be done to have success, looking at different applications to be successful and learning from mistakes that have been made in the past to better this critical are of the Monroe WMU. With great partnerships we can succeed it may take time and resources but we will put forth the effort to enhance this area.
List any and all partners (agencies, organizations, NGO's, private landowners) that support the proposal and/or have been contacted and included in the planning and design of the proposed project. Describe efforts to gather input and include these agencies, landowners, permitees, sportsman groups, researchers, etc. that may be interested/affected by the proposed project. Partners do not have to provide funding or in-kind services to a project to be listed.
*
Future Management
Future Management will consist of no grazing of livestock on the property until some issues are resolved and establishment of shrub seeded species can handle grazing in the future. We will continue to work towards the improvement of shrubs species that will benefit big game species in the area during critical times of the year (spring and fall). If warranted working with the Area Biologist to look at the wildlife populations and the effect that they are having on the range, possible reduction in mule deer or elk numbers in this location maybe needed to help this project be successful.
Detail future methods or techniques (including administrative actions) that will be implemented to help in accomplishing the stated objectives and to insure the long term success/stability of the proposed project. This may include: post-treatment grazing rest and/or management plans/changes, wildlife herd/species management plan changes, ranch plans, conservation easements or other permanent protection plans, resource management plans, forest plans, etc.
*
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources
Currently UDWR does not graze this property, but there have been some discussions in the past that this maybe a possibility, other adjacent properties have been grazed and the permittee may be looking at utilizing the grazing of the UDWR lands to off set depredation issues on private lands. The permittee may look at fixing and maintaining the fencing aspects of the property, grazing will be done during certain times of year to allow the reduction of cheatgrass through grazing and thus allowing for grasses, forbs and shrubs to be available in the fall and winter for mule deer and elk. UDWR will continue to work with the adjacent permittee to work out details that will benefit both the UDWR and the wildlife that use is area.
Potential for the proposed action to improve quality or quantity of sustainable uses such as grazing, timber harvest, biomass utilization, recreation, etc. Grazing improvements may include actions to improve forage availability and/or distribution of livestock.
Title Page
Project Details
Finance
Species
Habitats
Seed
Comments
Images/Documents
Completion Form
Project Summary Report
Saving...