Skip to Content
Main Menu
Search
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Projects
Maps
About Us
Register
Login
Search
Saving...
Thank you for requesting access to WRI.
An administrator will contact you with further details.
Dry Fork Vegetation Management Lop & Scatter
Region: Northeastern
ID: 4387
Project Status: Cancelled
Map This Project
Export Project Data
Project Details
*
Need for Project
Conifer tree species are advancing into Forest sagebrush and mountain browse vegetation communities and the Ashley Springs Municipal Watershed in lower Dry Fork Canyon of Uintah County. Conifer displacement of these vegetation types can impact habitat type and structure for wildlife, alter watershed stability, increase wildland fire impacts, and decrease vegetation and wildlife species diversity. The result are increased threats to native vegetation understory species, ecosystem resiliency, and brush-obligate wildlife species abundance. The proposed action would utilize minimal impact foot-access ground crews to remove conifer species within sagebrush and mountain browse communities. No roads would be opened or created and no ground surface disturbing activities are planned.
Provide evidence about the nature of the problem and the need to address it. Identify the significance of the problem using a variety of data sources. For example, if a habitat restoration project is being proposed to benefit greater sage-grouse, describe the existing plant community characteristics that limit habitat value for greater sage-grouse and identify the changes needed for habitat improvement.
*
Objectives
The basic project objective is to maintain native shrubland and understory vegetation species diversity, condition, distribution, dominance, and resiliency in areas where they have been historically dominant. Improved shrubland associated wildlife habitat stability and condition will also result. Specific objectives include: 1. Reduce shrubland vegetation community type change threats through invading conifer removal. 2. Reduce both potential wildfire threats and intensity through reducing hazardous fuel loads. 3. Improve wildlife habitat by maintaining native understory vegetation diversity and condition. 4. Protect the watershed and municipal water supply.
Provide an overall goal for the project and then provide clear, specific and measurable objectives (outcomes) to be accomplished by the proposed actions. If possible, tie to one or more of the public benefits UWRI is providing.
*
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?)
An immediate threat is the increase in hazardous fuel ladder effect provided by increasing conifer stem density. A wildfire event could create stand changing conditions that would jeopardize recovery of shrubland species such as sagebrush and the resultant loss of shrubland obligate wildlife species. Longer term threats include the slow loss of the shrubland communities through slowly advancing conifer dominance and displacement. Stand changing succession and/or wildfire impacts can reduce vegetation and wildlife species diversity, site recovery resiliency, and increase opportunities for noxious and invasive weed establishment.
LOCATION: Justify the proposed location of this project over other areas, include publicly scrutinized planning/recovery documents that list this area as a priority, remote sensing modeling that show this area is a good candidate for restoration, wildlife migration information and other data that help justify this project's location.
TIMING: Justify why this project should be implemented at this time. For example, Is the project area at risk of crossing an ecological or other threshold wherein future restoration would become more difficult, cost prohibitive, or even impossible.
*
Relation to Management Plans
The project supports the objectives and recommendations of the following applicable management plans: 1. UTAH DWR WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN (WAP) 2015 - 2025: The project will provide enhancements for 3 "Key Habitats" identified in the Action Plan. These include the following terrestrial habitat classifications Lowland Sagebrush, p. 106; Mountain Sagebrush, p. 120; and Mountain Shrub, p. 127. The project addresses these areas by removing problematic plant species (native), reducing habitat shifting, and reducing foothold areas for invasive non-native species. 2. ASHLEY NATIONAL FOREST LAND AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN 1986: Wildlife and Fish Goals (ANF Land and Resource Management Plan 1986, p. IV 28 - IV 31): Goal 1 - Manage fish and wildlife habitat to maintain or improve diversity and productivity. Goal 2 - Involve concerned government agencies, environmental organizations, and special interest groups in wildlife and fisheries management program. Objective 1. Develop and implement habitat management planning and improvements to include key ecosystems, wildlife, and plant species. Objective 2. Develop the species/habitat relationships of fish and wildlife. Objective 5. Develop support from wildlife intrest groups for funding or labor for wildlife and fish projects. Soil, Water, and Air (ANF Land and Resource Management Plan 1986, p. IV 37-42): Goal 1- Increase water yields from National Forest Watersheds. Goal 2 - Improve and conserve the basic soil and water resources. Objective 1. Increase water yields through resource management activities. Objective 2. Maintain or improve soil stability, site productivity and repair or stabilize damaged watersheds. Range Goal (ANF Land and Resource Management Plan 1986, p. IV 32-33): Achieve satisfactory ecological condition on all rangelands. Maintain or obtain plant diversity to meet the requirements of the NFMA. Objective 1. Maintain or improve all range in a fair or better condition class. Objective 2. Develop and implement an action plan for control of noxious weeds. Protection Goal (ANF Land and Resource Management Plan 1986, p. IV 54-55) : Provide cost-efficient protection of Forest resources, users, and administrative sites. Objective 1. Develop and implement a cost efficient fire management program based upon resource values. 3. UTAH DWR STATEWIDE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR MULE DEER 2014: The project addresses a principle habitat issue and concern (p. 8) of declining quality and quantity of forage which includes pinyon and juniper encroachment. The conifer encroachment removal will manage crucial mule deer habitat, utilize the WRI program, make broad scale improvements by diminishing conifer encroachment. (IV. Statewide Management Goals and Objectives, Habitat Goal, Habitat Objective 1.c, and Habitat Objective 2.b, d, e, g; pp. 18-20.) 4. UTAH DWR STATEWIDE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ELK 2010: This project addresses VI Statewide Management Goals and Objectives, B. Habitat Management Goal, Habitat Objective 2.c, d, g, & j; through identifying habitat improvement needs, working with WRI cooperation, and providing broad scale vegetative projects to improve habitats (pp. 13-14). 5. NER WRI "Rangelands" focus area.
List management plans where this project will address an objective or strategy in the plan. Describe how the project area overlaps the objective or strategy in the plan and the relevance of the project to the successful implementation of those plans. It is best to provide this information in a list format with the description immediately following the plan objective or strategy.
*
Fire/Fuels
As described above in the Threats/Risks and Relation to Management Plans sections, the project addresses hazardous fuels increases through removal of ladder fuel overstory conifers in shrubland communities, reduces the potential for large-scale and high intensity wildfires from developing, and supports maintenance of native understory vegetative communities. Native understories help eliminate establishment of potential fire-dependent invasive weed species monocultures or impacts (example: cheatgrass).
If applicable, detail how the proposed project will significantly reduce the risk of fuel loading and/or continuity of hazardous fuels including the use of fire-wise species in re-seeding operations. Describe the value of any features being protected by reducing the risk of fire. Values may include; communities at risk, permanent infrastructure, municipal watersheds, campgrounds, critical wildlife habitat, etc. Include the size of the area where fuels are being reduced and the distance from the feature(s) at risk.
*
Water Quality/Quantity
Maintaining healthy native understory vegetation communities will maintain soil and site stability; which will improve water percolation and reduce high intensity run-off risks and associated reductions in water quality. Also, removing deep rooted and year-long water use by pinyon and juniper species will enhance local water availability for adjacent native species. Water quality standards for the municipal watershed will also be supported by reducing the potential for large scale vegetative stand-changing fire events and the associated soil erosion and watershed stability issues that generally follow.
Describe how the project has the potential to improve water quality and/or increase water quantity, both over the short and long term. Address run-off, erosion, soil infiltration, and flooding, if applicable.
*
Compliance
The project is a CE under evaluation in the Ashley National Forest NEPA program. A decision is expected by November 2017.
Description of efforts, both completed and planned, to bring the proposed action into compliance with any and all cultural resource, NEPA, ESA, etc. requirements. If compliance is not required enter "not applicable" and explain why not it is not required.
*
Methods
Encroaching conifers within mapped shrubland vegetative communities will be removed on approximately 1,540.3 acres. Removal will be through foot-accessed hand cutting crews utilizing standard lop and scatter methods. Cut materials will be reduced to a ground height not to exceed 24-inches and trunk/stem of >3-inch diameter cut to lengths not to exceed 2-feet. Additional silviculture cutting prescriptions may also be included to forest inclusions to facilitate thinning or improved stand characteristics.
Describe the actions, activities, tasks to be implemented as part of the proposed project; how these activities will be carried out, equipment to be used, when, and by whom.
*
Monitoring
Pre-implementation landscape photos have been established for documenting existing pre-treatment conditions. Immediate post-treatment photos from the same photopoints will also be taken. Additional revisits and photos from the same locations will then occur at intervals through the Forest Ecologist's long-term study program.
Describe plans to monitor for project success and achievement of stated objectives. Include details on type of monitoring (vegetation, wildlife, etc.), schedule, assignments and how the results of these monitoring efforts will be reported and/or uploaded to this project page. If needed, upload detailed plans in the "attachments" section.
*
Partners
Routine public project scoping is included in the NEPA analysis and project updates. These include grazers, elected officials, multiple special interests, Ute Indian Tribe, and government agency cooperators.
List any and all partners (agencies, organizations, NGO's, private landowners) that support the proposal and/or have been contacted and included in the planning and design of the proposed project. Describe efforts to gather input and include these agencies, landowners, permitees, sportsman groups, researchers, etc. that may be interested/affected by the proposed project. Partners do not have to provide funding or in-kind services to a project to be listed.
*
Future Management
The project area in Dry Fork is a municipal watershed, is in inventoried roadless designation, is not grazed, but does receive a high degree of public recreation throughout the year. No changes to management direction for any of these resource uses is expected. The wildlife use includes hunting and watching. The project should help to maintain wildlife diversity and would therefore enhance future opportunities for these uses.
Detail future methods or techniques (including administrative actions) that will be implemented to help in accomplishing the stated objectives and to insure the long term success/stability of the proposed project. This may include: post-treatment grazing rest and/or management plans/changes, wildlife herd/species management plan changes, ranch plans, conservation easements or other permanent protection plans, resource management plans, forest plans, etc.
*
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources
The project area is not grazed and has little livestock grazing value due to the steep nature of the terrain. Therefore, there will be little benefit for livestock grazing in the immediate area. However, healthy range lands surrounding areas that are grazed will help minimize noxious weed advancements or wildfire impacts to the grazing allotments.
Potential for the proposed action to improve quality or quantity of sustainable uses such as grazing, timber harvest, biomass utilization, recreation, etc. Grazing improvements may include actions to improve forage availability and/or distribution of livestock.
Title Page
Project Details
Finance
Species
Habitats
Seed
Comments
Images/Documents
Project Summary Report