Skip to Content
Main Menu
Search
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Projects
Maps
About Us
Register
Login
Search
Saving...
Thank you for requesting access to WRI.
An administrator will contact you with further details.
Book Cliffs Bison Habitat Enhancement Cherry Mesa
Region: Northeastern
ID: 4444
Project Status: Completed
Map This Project
Export Project Data
Project Details
*
Need for Project
The Utah Division of Wildlife Resources manages a free ranging bison herd in the Book Cliffs. The management plan for bison calls for up to 450 individuals. While the bison have not yet reached objective and only minor concerns have been identified, UDWR wants to be proactive in staying ahead of any conflicts with domestic livestock or other wildlife species. The upper elevations of the Book Cliffs is dominated by mountain big sagebrush. This sagebrush subspecies grows at higher elevations and takes advantage of higher precipitation patterns. As a result, it can quickly become dense and impact understory vegetation such as grasses and forbs. Several areas in the Book Cliffs have mountain big sagebrush exceding 20% canopy cover. This project is intended to reduce mountain sagebrush cover in polygons and drainages in an effort to increase grass and forbs. The project is not designed as a block treatment, but rather as a mosaic treatment focusing on significant sagebrush density reduction within polygons as a means to achieve density reduction over a longer period of time, while still maintaining cover nearby. The project is within summer habitat for mule deer and elk and increasing forbs and grasses should benefit these species. The area is not defined as sage grouse habitat and no reports have been documented of sage grouse in these areas for several decades.
Provide evidence about the nature of the problem and the need to address it. Identify the significance of the problem using a variety of data sources. For example, if a habitat restoration project is being proposed to benefit greater sage-grouse, describe the existing plant community characteristics that limit habitat value for greater sage-grouse and identify the changes needed for habitat improvement.
*
Objectives
The objectives of this project are to: 1.) Increase grass and forbs in the treatment polygons 2.) Increase available forage for bison, elk, deer, and domestic livestock 3.) Decrease mountain sagebrush cover to less than 15%
Provide an overall goal for the project and then provide clear, specific and measurable objectives (outcomes) to be accomplished by the proposed actions. If possible, tie to one or more of the public benefits UWRI is providing.
*
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?)
There are a few minor threats and risks from implenting this project: 1.) If application rate is too high, other desirable shrubs such as bitterbrush and mountain mahogany could be impacted. In addition, forbs and grass could be impacted if rate it too high. However, we plan on using a reduced rate from other projects completed in the Book Cliffs where significant impacts did not occur. 2.) Some of the polygons may have different soil types where tebuthiuron may become mobile and not as effective. This would result in a reduced control of mountain big sagebrush.
LOCATION: Justify the proposed location of this project over other areas, include publicly scrutinized planning/recovery documents that list this area as a priority, remote sensing modeling that show this area is a good candidate for restoration, wildlife migration information and other data that help justify this project's location.
TIMING: Justify why this project should be implemented at this time. For example, Is the project area at risk of crossing an ecological or other threshold wherein future restoration would become more difficult, cost prohibitive, or even impossible.
*
Relation to Management Plans
Book Cliffs Bison Plan: B. Habitat Management Goal: Provide quality habitat to establish and maintain a healthy bison population in the Book Cliffs. Objective 1: Maintain or improve sufficient bison habitat to allow herds to reach population objectives. Strategies: 1. Identify critical bison use areas and work with land managers and private landowners to improve or maintain habitat quality in these areas. 3. Continue cooperative habitat improvement efforts. 4. Vegetation monitoring will be established on habitat projects prior to implementation, and read two years after implementation to evaluate success or failure of the project. Objective 3: Achieve bison population distribution that effectively utilizes available habitat and minimizes conflict. Strategies: 1. Provide adequate forage on summer and transitional ranges to discourage bison use on winter ranges during summer months. Consider other alternatives such as gap fences, herding, and fencing of water sources on winter ranges. 4. Discourage bison from areas with potential conflicts by improving range conditions in areas where conflicts do not exist.
List management plans where this project will address an objective or strategy in the plan. Describe how the project area overlaps the objective or strategy in the plan and the relevance of the project to the successful implementation of those plans. It is best to provide this information in a list format with the description immediately following the plan objective or strategy.
*
Fire/Fuels
Reducing mountain big sagebrush cover will result in a change of fuel type to grasses and fobs. Flame lengths will be reduced and allow for increased chance of suppression after the treatment is completed. The treated polygons should reduce the fire intensity in the event of a future wildfire. However, Landfire data indicate that there is a lower fire risk in this area. Nonetheless, adjacent areas rapidly burned during the 2002 Rattle Complex Fire.
If applicable, detail how the proposed project will significantly reduce the risk of fuel loading and/or continuity of hazardous fuels including the use of fire-wise species in re-seeding operations. Describe the value of any features being protected by reducing the risk of fire. Values may include; communities at risk, permanent infrastructure, municipal watersheds, campgrounds, critical wildlife habitat, etc. Include the size of the area where fuels are being reduced and the distance from the feature(s) at risk.
*
Water Quality/Quantity
This project may result in a small improvement to water quality. As mountain big sagebrush increases, perennial grass and forb species are diminished, and bare soil is a result. Increasing ground cover will reduce the amount of sedimentation and erosion as compared to when herbacious understory is limited. Water quantity is not expected to measurably change.
Describe how the project has the potential to improve water quality and/or increase water quantity, both over the short and long term. Address run-off, erosion, soil infiltration, and flooding, if applicable.
*
Compliance
The project is located on SITLA lands and no NEPA is required. A range improvement project form and authorization will be secured from SITLA. The project does not include ground disturbing activities, so no archaeological surveys will need to be completed.
Description of efforts, both completed and planned, to bring the proposed action into compliance with any and all cultural resource, NEPA, ESA, etc. requirements. If compliance is not required enter "not applicable" and explain why not it is not required.
*
Methods
A fixed wing aircraft will be contracted to apply tebuthiuron to the treatment area polygons. Rates of herbicide will be consistent with those previously used in the Book Cliffs. GPS technology will be used to define treatment location and to set up grids for application. Tebuthiron will be applied at a rate of 0.7 lbs/acre of active ingredient.
Describe the actions, activities, tasks to be implemented as part of the proposed project; how these activities will be carried out, equipment to be used, when, and by whom.
*
Monitoring
UDWR will establish a basic photo point monitoring plot including a line intercept transect to monitor the canopy cover of mountain big sagebrush. Other formal range trend monitoring sites exist in the Three Pines area, and serve as a suitable surrogate of vegetation response from tebuthiron application in the Book Cliffs.
Describe plans to monitor for project success and achievement of stated objectives. Include details on type of monitoring (vegetation, wildlife, etc.), schedule, assignments and how the results of these monitoring efforts will be reported and/or uploaded to this project page. If needed, upload detailed plans in the "attachments" section.
*
Partners
SITLA is a partner in this project and will ultimately approve the RIP project form as the land management agency. In addition, GIP and the other permittee, Main Canyon Ranch, are also partners in this project. Previous projects have received funding support from conservation groups including Utah Bowman's Association, Sportsmen for Fish and Wildlife, Safari Club International, and Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation.
List any and all partners (agencies, organizations, NGO's, private landowners) that support the proposal and/or have been contacted and included in the planning and design of the proposed project. Describe efforts to gather input and include these agencies, landowners, permitees, sportsman groups, researchers, etc. that may be interested/affected by the proposed project. Partners do not have to provide funding or in-kind services to a project to be listed.
*
Future Management
Mountain big sagebrush at higher elevations and precipitation zones has a faster return interval than other sagebrush types. It is anticipated that sagebrush cover will again dominate within a 20 year time period. Future treatments will be needed to maintain a balance between sagebrush, grass, and forb cover. In the mean time, no additional management activites are planned or anticipated.
Detail future methods or techniques (including administrative actions) that will be implemented to help in accomplishing the stated objectives and to insure the long term success/stability of the proposed project. This may include: post-treatment grazing rest and/or management plans/changes, wildlife herd/species management plan changes, ranch plans, conservation easements or other permanent protection plans, resource management plans, forest plans, etc.
*
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources
The project will increase forage in the project area. Increases in available forage will help prevent conflicts in the future as bison populations expand. The treatment occurs within the McClelland grazing allotment on SITLA leases held UDWR and Main Canyon Ranch.
Potential for the proposed action to improve quality or quantity of sustainable uses such as grazing, timber harvest, biomass utilization, recreation, etc. Grazing improvements may include actions to improve forage availability and/or distribution of livestock.
Title Page
Project Details
Finance
Species
Habitats
Seed
Comments
Images/Documents
Completion Form
Project Summary Report