Skip to Content
Main Menu
Search
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Projects
Maps
About Us
Register
Login
Search
Saving...
Thank you for requesting access to WRI.
An administrator will contact you with further details.
Ogden Bay WMA Channel cleaning FY19
Region: Northern
ID: 4633
Project Status: Cancelled
Map This Project
Export Project Data
Project Details
*
Need for Project
There is a need for this project, so managers can have the ability to manage the wetland habitat. Silt deposition is an annual event, but in 2011 many channels experienced extreme siltation. These affected channels don't have the capacity to move much water currently. Because of the inability to move water, wetlands downstream are suffering and Phragmites is dominating the area. In addition to gaining the ability to manage the water, there will also be a huge benefit to nesting waterfowl and pheasants in this area. Currently, There aren't many available nesting sites adjacent to these channels.
Provide evidence about the nature of the problem and the need to address it. Identify the significance of the problem using a variety of data sources. For example, if a habitat restoration project is being proposed to benefit greater sage-grouse, describe the existing plant community characteristics that limit habitat value for greater sage-grouse and identify the changes needed for habitat improvement.
*
Objectives
The objectives of this project will be to clean the channels of silt. By cleaning the channels, managers will have the ability to manage the wetlands efficiently. The silt will be stacked along established dikes, so that wetlands aren't inadvertantly filled. The silt will then be leveled, disked and planted.
Provide an overall goal for the project and then provide clear, specific and measurable objectives (outcomes) to be accomplished by the proposed actions. If possible, tie to one or more of the public benefits UWRI is providing.
*
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?)
One threat that exists is that managers will continue to be unable to manage the water appropriately and the wetlands will become further degraded. Risks during the project include getting the machine stuck.
LOCATION: Justify the proposed location of this project over other areas, include publicly scrutinized planning/recovery documents that list this area as a priority, remote sensing modeling that show this area is a good candidate for restoration, wildlife migration information and other data that help justify this project's location.
TIMING: Justify why this project should be implemented at this time. For example, Is the project area at risk of crossing an ecological or other threshold wherein future restoration would become more difficult, cost prohibitive, or even impossible.
*
Relation to Management Plans
This project is related to the purpose of Ogden Bay Waterfowl Management Area as stated in the habitat management plan:To preserve, restore, and enhance both aquatic and terrestrial habitat for wildlife; increase wildlife populations to meet wildlife management objectives; conserve, protect, and recover sensitive wildlife species and their habitats; protect cultural resources; and provide for recreational opportunities that are compatible with the purpose of upland and wetland ecosystems. In relation to the WAP, Objective #1 for Sediment Transport Imbalance Opportunities are found and taken,to modify or remove reservoir infrastructure, or modify outflow management, to simulate or return natural sediment transport. This project meets this objective by removing sediment that has accumulated over the years and restores the channels to a more natural flow. Also in relation to WAP is Objective #2 for Droughts Aquatic SGCNs and key habitats persist on the landscape, despite increasing drought conditions. Drought conditions over the past several years has made it imperative that the WMA's have properly functioning water control structures and delivery channels to maximize water deliveries in order to maintain key wetland habitats. Actions that this project will address include; 2.3.6 Restore aquatic habitat complexity Also in relation to the WAP are: Invasive plant (Phragmites) dominance/presence is reduced or eliminated in locations or habitats where such an outcome is realistic (ecologically and economically).2.2.2 Survey and inventory established and new populations of invasive/problematic species. 2.2.3 Eradicate established populations of invasive/problematic species. 2.2.4 Contain established populations of invasive/problematic species. 2.2.9 Avoid establishment of new invasive/problematic species through education, planning, management, and/or regulation.
List management plans where this project will address an objective or strategy in the plan. Describe how the project area overlaps the objective or strategy in the plan and the relevance of the project to the successful implementation of those plans. It is best to provide this information in a list format with the description immediately following the plan objective or strategy.
*
Fire/Fuels
N/A
If applicable, detail how the proposed project will significantly reduce the risk of fuel loading and/or continuity of hazardous fuels including the use of fire-wise species in re-seeding operations. Describe the value of any features being protected by reducing the risk of fire. Values may include; communities at risk, permanent infrastructure, municipal watersheds, campgrounds, critical wildlife habitat, etc. Include the size of the area where fuels are being reduced and the distance from the feature(s) at risk.
*
Water Quality/Quantity
The water quality won't be impacted, but the water quantity that can be moved in the channels will increase.
Describe how the project has the potential to improve water quality and/or increase water quantity, both over the short and long term. Address run-off, erosion, soil infiltration, and flooding, if applicable.
*
Compliance
The archaeologist will be consulted for this project. However, the areas have already been disturbed in the past.
Description of efforts, both completed and planned, to bring the proposed action into compliance with any and all cultural resource, NEPA, ESA, etc. requirements. If compliance is not required enter "not applicable" and explain why not it is not required.
*
Methods
A 324 EL or 326 FL long reach hoe will be leased from whatever company has the state contract at the time of the project. This hoe will need to be leased for one month. One of the two waterfowl maintenance crew operators will operate the machine. Silt will be cleaned out of the channels and stacked on adjacent dikes or uplands. Once the silt is dried after a few months, one of the waterfowl maintenance crew operators will take a dozer and level the areas. After the areas are leveled WMA personnel will take the tractor and disk the areas and prepare them for seeding. A seed mix consisting of grasses and forbs will then be planted to provide nesting habitat for both waterfowl and pheasants.
Describe the actions, activities, tasks to be implemented as part of the proposed project; how these activities will be carried out, equipment to be used, when, and by whom.
*
Monitoring
The project will be monitored with photographs before, during and after the project.
Describe plans to monitor for project success and achievement of stated objectives. Include details on type of monitoring (vegetation, wildlife, etc.), schedule, assignments and how the results of these monitoring efforts will be reported and/or uploaded to this project page. If needed, upload detailed plans in the "attachments" section.
*
Partners
N/A
List any and all partners (agencies, organizations, NGO's, private landowners) that support the proposal and/or have been contacted and included in the planning and design of the proposed project. Describe efforts to gather input and include these agencies, landowners, permitees, sportsman groups, researchers, etc. that may be interested/affected by the proposed project. Partners do not have to provide funding or in-kind services to a project to be listed.
*
Future Management
Future management will benefit from this project in the wetlands. The wetlands will become more productive as the water will be able to be managed more efficiently. The uplands will be monitored annually and any noxious weeds that establish will be sprayed with herbicide. The channels will also be monitored and may need to be cleaned again sometime in the future.
Detail future methods or techniques (including administrative actions) that will be implemented to help in accomplishing the stated objectives and to insure the long term success/stability of the proposed project. This may include: post-treatment grazing rest and/or management plans/changes, wildlife herd/species management plan changes, ranch plans, conservation easements or other permanent protection plans, resource management plans, forest plans, etc.
*
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources
N/A
Potential for the proposed action to improve quality or quantity of sustainable uses such as grazing, timber harvest, biomass utilization, recreation, etc. Grazing improvements may include actions to improve forage availability and/or distribution of livestock.
Title Page
Project Details
Finance
Species
Habitats
Seed
Comments
Images/Documents
Project Summary Report