Skip to Content
Main Menu
Search
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Projects
Maps
About Us
Register
Login
Search
Saving...
Thank you for requesting access to WRI.
An administrator will contact you with further details.
Hogs Heaven Watershed Enhancement Project
Region: Southern
ID: 4781
Project Status: Completed
Map This Project
Export Project Data
Project Details
*
Need for Project
1. Currently the North Fork of the Virgin River is listed as high Priority 303d water body because of elevated levels of E. coli. Utah department of Environmental Quality has linked the elevated levels back to fecal bacteria from livestock and wildlife. The levels of E. coli are posing a threat to recreational uses in the river and could potentially contaminate drinking water further downstream. By increasing the amount of available forage away from the north fork, the goal is to reduce the amount of animals near and in the north fork and reduce the amount of fecal matter that makes into the north fork. Upland health is key to riparian health. 2. Livestock production is the primary use of the private land. Because of the PJ encroachment livestock production is limited by forage and prefer the forage found in the riparian area. The upland areas have become invaded by pinyon and juniper trees, resulting in a lack of forage. The lack of forage drives livestock to the irrigated pastures along the riparian area. 3. Big Game use this area as transitional range. Large numbers of mule deer pass through this area in the early fall and spring as mule deer and elk transition from winter to summer range. Improving range conditions will theoretical will improve body condition for wildlife. Improved body condition will improve survival and condition of the animal once it reaches its winter range. Elk use the area heavily in the late fall and in some winters. Depending on snow depth, Elk can be found in this area throughout the winter. In the words of Wade Heaton "We aren't going to have healthy wildlife populations without private landowners, and that includes general season landowners". Every unit management plan also calls for working to private owners to improve wildlife habitat. This area has been identified in Utah's new Big Game Migration Corridor Plan as an extremely important corridor for migrating mule deer. Utah is working to develop a Migration Initiative Program and this area has been identified recently as critical mule deer migration habitat. Big game migration corridors have become a national priority with several states developing Migration Initiative programs. The Department of the Interior has also signed a Presidential Secretarial Order (SO 3362) which directs federal agencies within the department to work with states restoring and conserving migration corridors and winter ranges (see #16 management plans for more details). Working with USFWS, we will likely apply for special migration corridor funding under SO 3362 to off-set WRI costs. See the full SO 3362 in the attachments sections for more details. Non-game species including California Condor and Golden Eagles potentially occur in this area according to the UDWR Heritage Database. These species will benefit from the open space created and the expected increase in prey species in these areas. The project falls within an identified Bird Habitat Conservation Area (BHCA) with lowland riparian habitat listed as a priority habitat type for conservation (BHCA #48: Virgin River). Priority bird species listed in the BHCA are Abert's Towhee, Lucy's Warbler, Bell's Vireo, Gray Vireo, and several waterfowl species. The Virgin River and associated contributing streams provide critical riparian habitat in a desert setting. Improving upland will directly benefit lowland riparian habitat in many ways. These private mesic lands and surrounding private rangelands are critically important to the health of wildlife populations. Research shows that 60--80% of wildlife is dependent on mesic habitats (e.g., wetlands and riparian areas; Thomas et al. 1979, Patten 1998, Belsky et al. 1999, Peck and Lovvorn 2001). If true wildlife conservation is to take place on a sustainable level, public wildlife managers must engage private landowners. Working on the adjacent rangelands will have direct positive impacts to riparian areas. Improving range conditions on adjacent uplands theoretically should improve the conditions of the riparian and water quality in the north fork. Currently the Range Land Health is poor because of the encroachment of pinyon and juniper trees into historically grass and brush uplands. Return these uplands to desirable forage for wildlife and livestock will help reduce the use of the riparian areas. Because this area has been identified as a critical migration corridor for mule deer habitat we feel that this projects importance should be elevated because of the overall impact of the habitat to these species of wildlife. Another qualifier for elevating this project is that the project falls within an identified Bird Habitat Conservation Area (BHCA) as previously discussed. The project will also address several conservation needs for several bird species not captured in the species section of this proposal.
Provide evidence about the nature of the problem and the need to address it. Identify the significance of the problem using a variety of data sources. For example, if a habitat restoration project is being proposed to benefit greater sage-grouse, describe the existing plant community characteristics that limit habitat value for greater sage-grouse and identify the changes needed for habitat improvement.
*
Objectives
1. Decrease present of E. coli in the North Fork of the Virgin River, to a allowable amount for Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ). Removal from the 303d classification is a long-term goal. 2. Increase forage for livestock, including browse (bitter brush) for sheep in treated areas by a minimum of 10%. 3. Increase mule deer usage of transitional habitat and hold over time of migrating. This data can be determined through the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Migration Initiative. 4. Increase or maintain elk use on the private ground, while reducing the negative impacts to private land owners and their operations.
Provide an overall goal for the project and then provide clear, specific and measurable objectives (outcomes) to be accomplished by the proposed actions. If possible, tie to one or more of the public benefits UWRI is providing.
*
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?)
1. Currently a contentious relationship has developed between land mangers and private landowners. Working with the private landowner and UDWR to provide solutions is intended to sooth tension by providing options for livestock producers. Increasing the forage will also improve landowner tolerance for wildlife use on the property. 2. Total Daily Load will continue to increase if management changes aren't made to the current operation. Masticating and seeding will provide options for livestock operators to manage their usage. As stated in Utah State University Extension bulletin "good soil and water conservation practices on upland areas represent the first, and perhaps the most critical step for the protection of riparian areas." This what the goal of the mastication work is. Improve the uplands, improve the riparian and water resources. 3. Currently the landowners/livestock producers are tolerant of wildlife use of their property. Wildlife, especially mule deer and elk use these properties in migration as transitional habitat. Increasing forage, and land productiveness, will help offset conflicts with private landowners/livestock producers, while increasing the forage for wildlife and contributing to a diverse plant community. 5. Fire is a threat if left untreated due the dense stand of pinyon and juniper, that could threaten older age class ponderosa pine forest and private structures in the area. 6. Sheet and Rill erosion contributes to the amount of sediment from the late phase II pinyon juniper sites that lack under story. With the mastication, mulch will cover the bare soil while seeds are established. Decreasing soil erosion and moisture lost, while increasing soil moisture holding availability and cover of the soil. In areas in or near the treatment sites that have been cleared and seed have proved to be very successful (see pictures for details). This project will increase and maintain the availability of a diverse suite of vegetational communities. A healthy landscape has a diversity of vegetational states within an ecological site. A diverse landscape benefits a larger community of wildlife species and people. A diverse landscape is also more resistance and resilient to disturbance. By allowing this landscape to continue to move further into a dominant PJ woodland it increases the risk of its resistance to disturbance and its resilience to bounce back and and heal after a disturbance. 7. This project will directly and indirectly effect positively high interest game. Mule deer and elk are found in the project area. Mule deer could use this area for a staging area in their migration, as has been seen on other projects on the Parowan Front allowing them to be in better condition as they enter the winter range and as the deer return in spring and summer. Elk will use this area from the fall to spring, if weather does not force them to lower elevations. In consultation with the wildlife biologist over this unit, he would prefer that the elk and mule deer remain in these areas longer, because it would give managers a chance to manage them, rather when they enter Zion National Park and management is not an option. 8. A species of greatest resource concern that has been documented in the area is the California Condor. Condors summer near Kolob Reservoir (12 miles West), the open areas will increase the visibility of condors as they search for carrion. The anticipated increase in herbivore use would theatrically increase the number of carcasses available to the condors also. Working with Hawk Watch that monitor condors on the Zion we were told "that any improvements to unglates with benefit condors and their populations". With these treatments condor habitat will be improved. 9. These private mesic lands and surrounding private rangelands are critically important to the health of wildlife populations. Research shows that 60--80% of wildlife is dependent on mesic habitats (e.g., wetlands and riparian areas; Thomas et al. 1979, Patten 1998, Belsky et al. 1999, Peck and Lovvorn 2001). If true wildlife conservation is to take place on a sustainable level, public wildlife managers must engage private landowners. 10. As previously stated, because this area has been identified as a critical migration corridor for mule deer habitat we feel that this projects need and importance should be elevated because of the overall impact of the habitat to these species of wildlife. Another ecological qualifier for elevating this project is that the project falls within an identified Bird Habitat Conservation Area (BHCA) as previously discussed. The project will also address several conservation needs for several bird species not captured in the species section of this proposal. 11. Native fishes in the Virgin River are of special concern. These species may include: virgin spinedace (Lepidomeda mollispinis mollispinis), desert sucker(Catostomus clarkii), speckled dace (Rhinichthys osculus), and flannelmouth sucker (Catostomus latipinnis). The virgin spinedace and flannelmouth sucker are both much reduced from their original Virgin River habitat. Both are managed under conservation agreements. Water quality improvements have the potential to benefit these fish species on site and downstream.
LOCATION: Justify the proposed location of this project over other areas, include publicly scrutinized planning/recovery documents that list this area as a priority, remote sensing modeling that show this area is a good candidate for restoration, wildlife migration information and other data that help justify this project's location.
TIMING: Justify why this project should be implemented at this time. For example, Is the project area at risk of crossing an ecological or other threshold wherein future restoration would become more difficult, cost prohibitive, or even impossible.
*
Relation to Management Plans
1. Utah Mule Deer Statewide Plan "Support all habitat objectives and strategies in this plan to protect and improve mule deer habitat..." "Explore additional opportunities to provide incentives to landowners that provide habitat for mule deer." * "Work with university extension to increase landowner participation in the Watershed Restoration Initiative program." "Initiate broad scale vegetative treatment projects to improve mule deer habitat with emphasis on drought or fire damaged sagebrush winter ranges, ranges that have been taken over by invasive annual grass species, and ranges being diminished by encroachment of conifers into sagebrush or aspen habitats, ensuring that seed mixes contain sufficient forbs and browse species." "Continue to support and provide leadership for the Utah Watershed Restoration Initiative, which emphasizes improving sagebrush-steppe, aspen, and riparian habitats throughout Utah." This projects falls in the Crucial Mule Deer Habitat Priorities . 2. Deer Herd Unit Management Plan, Deer Herd # 29, Zion *"A major proportion of both summer and winter habitat for deer on this unit is on private land. Therefore, it is paramount to work with private landowners to maintain both summer and winter habitat. Currently, there is one CWMU of 13,000 acres (Mt. Carmel - Zion) in the Muddy Creek drainage on the east portion of this unit. Other landowners have expressed interest in a CWMU and they may be organized in the future." * "Reduce expansion of Pinion-Juniper woodlands into sagebrush habitats and improve habitats dominated by Pinion-Juniper woodlands by completing habitat restoration projects like lop & scatter, bullhog, and chaining." * "Work toward long-term habitat protection and preservation through agreements with land management agencies and local governments, the use of conservation easements, etc. on private lands and working toward blocking up UDWR properties through land exchanges with willing partners." 3. Utah Statewide Elk Management Plan *"Continue to provide incentive programs for landowners that will encourage elk populations on private land such as the CWMU, Landowner Association, and WalkIn Access programs." * "Increase forage production by annually treating a minimum of 40,000 acres of elk habitat.' * "Coordinate with land management agencies, conservation organizations, private landowners, and local leaders through the regional Watershed Restoration Initiative working groups to identify and prioritize elk habitats that are in need of enhancement or restoration. i) Identify habitat projects on summer ranges (aspen communities) to improve calving habitat. ii) Encourage land managers to manage portions of forests in early succession stages through the use controlled burning and logging. Controlled burning should only be used in areas with minimal invasive weed and/or safety concerns." 4. Utah Statewide Bighorn Sheep Management Plan * "Improve or maintain existing water sources and develop new water sources as needed to improve distribution and abundance of bighorn sheep." Note: These lands are used from domestic sheep summer range. Expanding bighorn sheep habitat is not goal of this project but improving water sources for bighorn sheep is a result of the project. 5. Zion National Park, Virgin River Comprehensive Management Plan/Environmental Assessment * "To protect and enhance free flow and water quantity, promoting the river's ability to shape the geologic landscape by reducing impediments to free flow, improving hydrological function, and ensuring flows that are largely natural." * "To protect and enhance river-related natural resources and ecological processes. The natural function of riparian areas, wetlands, and floodplains of the Virgin River and its tributaries would be maintained and restored; restoration activities would strive to return habitat to natural levels of complexity and diversity; water quality would be maintained at the highest possible levels; and achievement of this goal would benefit fish, wildlife, ecological processes, geologic values, and recreation." 6. Zion National Park General Management Plan * "Maintain the resources, including plant and animal communities, at healthy and viable levels consistent with natural processes." 7. TMDL for Escherichia coli (E. coli) in the North Fork Virgin River Watershed * "Common sources of E. coli include excrement from livestock and wildlife as well as faulty septic systems." Note- the objective is to remove intensive grazing from the riparian area by improving the uplands and taking a watershed approach to the issue. 8. Virgin River Watershed Management Plan * "Key concerns in the North Fork Virgin River Include: (1) Maintenance of minimum flow; (2) threatened and endangered species; (3) wastewater disposal and septic system density; and (4) recreation." 9. USFWS Partners for Fish and Wildlife Strategic Plan * "Project addresses habitat threats for a priority species within a PFW priority area (Plateau Focus Area) for restoration work." 10. Utah Catastrophic Wildfire Reduction Strategy * "Reduce fire risk by managing and removing invasive species." 11. Intermountain West Joint Venture Habitat Conservation Strategy * "Support existing public-private partnerships to implement sagebrush habitat conservation, at regional, state, and local scales." "Remove encroaching conifers to functionally restore sagebrush habitat." 12. Utah Wildlife Action Plan * "Lowland sagebrush is a key habitat identified in the WAP." * "WAP identifies inappropriate fire frequency as a threat to lowland sagebrush habitat. This project will reduce future fire risk and act as a fire buffer to adjacent higher risk areas." 13. State of Utah Resource Management Plan "Actively remove pinyon-juniper encroachment other ecological sites due to its substantial consumption of water its detrimental effects on sagebrush, other vegetation, and wildlife." "Conserve, improve, and restore 500,000 acres of mule deer habitat throughout the state with emphasis on crucial ranges." "Work with landowners, federal government and private organizations to conserve valuable wildlife habitat and winter range along urban interface." "Develop mechanisms and policies to incentivize private landowners throughout Utah to conserve valuable wildlife habitat throughout Utah." 14. Kane County Resource Management Plan "However, Kane County encourages vegetative treatments for maximum yield of forage and rangeland health." "Goals include making sure there is quality forage, water, cover, space and security sufficient to support productive populations. This includes conserving habitat for migratory birds, maintaining vegetation treatments that benefit wildlife, prioritizing treatments to improve habitats and coordinating predator control." 15. Southwest Working Third 5-year Review-2012 for California Condor "The recovery strategy for the California condor is to focus on: maintaining habitat for condor recovery and to provide foraging habitat" 16. SECRETARIAL ORDER NO. 3362: DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Subject: Improving Habitat Quality in Western Big-Game Winter Range and Migration Corridors Sec. 1 Purpose. This Order directs appropriate bureaus within the Department of the Interior (Department) to work in close partnership with the states of Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming to enhance and improve the quality of big-game winter range and migration corridor habitat on Federal lands under the management jurisdiction of this Department in a way that recognizes state authority to conserve and manage big-game species and respects private property rights. Through scientific endeavors and land management actions, wildlife such as Rocky Mountain Elk (elk), Mule Deer (deer), Pronghorn Antelope (pronghorn), and a host of other species will benefit. Additionally, this Order seeks to expand opportunities for big-game hunting by improving priority habitats to assist states in their efforts to increase and maintain sustainable big game populations across western states.
List management plans where this project will address an objective or strategy in the plan. Describe how the project area overlaps the objective or strategy in the plan and the relevance of the project to the successful implementation of those plans. It is best to provide this information in a list format with the description immediately following the plan objective or strategy.
*
Fire/Fuels
This project will decrease the risk of high severity wildfire by reducing fuel loading and promoting the growth of understory vegetation, which are critical to maintaining ecosystem resilience. As demonstrated by the nearby Brianhead fire during the summer of 2017, treatments like these can break up the continuity of fuels and act as fuel breaks. This project will do the same if a fire ignited nearby where fuel loading is heavy in phase 3 pinyon and juniper invaded sites. The current fire regime condition class is moderate (2), and would be reduced to low (1) immediately after treatment. The habitat type has been identified in the 2015-2025 Utah Wildlife Action Plan that lowland sagebrush is a key habitat and the threats associated with this key habitat are inappropriate fire frequency and intensity. This project will help to achieve this goal. Reducing the threat of wildfire is important because of the critical nature of this habitat to mule deer and elk. Completing this project and reducing the risk of fire will help to protect important sagebrush steppe and mountain brush habitat that is critical for priority species including, but not limited to, mule deer and elk. This project will also help to protect the springs and wetlands. If a high severity fire were to move through the area water soil infiltration would decrease, erosion will increase, and the potential for water to get into the aquifer will decrease and spring flows may decrease.
If applicable, detail how the proposed project will significantly reduce the risk of fuel loading and/or continuity of hazardous fuels including the use of fire-wise species in re-seeding operations. Describe the value of any features being protected by reducing the risk of fire. Values may include; communities at risk, permanent infrastructure, municipal watersheds, campgrounds, critical wildlife habitat, etc. Include the size of the area where fuels are being reduced and the distance from the feature(s) at risk.
*
Water Quality/Quantity
Reducing the amount of pinyon/juniper will increase and prolong stream flows, while reducing erosion caused by bare soil. The species planted will help stabilize the soil and reduce erosion. Kormas et al. found that drainage's dominated with juniper experience "snow water equivalent peaks higher, snow melts out earlier, and more water is lost to evapotranspiration in catchments when compared to sagebrush steppe vegetation". In a study from 2008, Deboodt, et. al (2008) mentions that juniper trees can use up to 30 gallons of water a day, when adequate moisture is present. It also states that Vegetative modeling has shown that 9 to 35 trees per acre can utilize all the precipitation delivered to a site in a 13-in annual precipitation zone. In their study researchers monitored two watersheds 12 years prior to treatment (cutting). After the treatment analysis indicated that juniper reduction significantly increased late season spring flow by 225%, increased days of recorded groundwater by an average of 41 days , and increased the relative availability of late season soil moisture to soil depths of .76 meters. It was also noted that managing vegetation for water yield may be obtainable at a much lower precipitation threshold than what was previously understood. Baker, et. al (1984) found a 157% increase in stream flows over a 147 ha pinyon and juniper treatment. Recent research Roundy, et. al. (2014) has shown that mechanical treatments to remove pinyon and juniper increase time that soil water is available. Even four years after treatment, treated areas showed from 8.6 days to-18 days additional water availability at high elevation sites. Roth, et. All (2017) stated snow pack is deeper and last longer in the open site at the low and mid sites (4-26 and 11-33 days, respectively). Additional research by Young, et. al. (2013) also showed a relationship between tree removal and soil climates and wet days on these sites, which while providing more available moisture for desired vegetation could also provide moisture for weeds. Numerous studies have shown that increased infiltration rates and less overland flow improve both water quality and quantity. Reducing pinyon and juniper trees, according the available research should increase snow pack, and time that snow pack is on the ground, increase spring flows, and increase soil moisture. It is expected that similar results will happen in this area after the treatment takes place. Water quality will improve as sediment will less likely to flow into the North Fork because of the mulch provide by the masticated trees and the seed establishment. The reduction of E.coli will be the result of livestock not being in the pasture during irrigation, and alternative forage sources will be provided allow an option for livestock and wildlife another forage source out the riparian area. During the two growing seasons that livestock will not be on the private land, important data will be able to be gathered to help determine what is the source of E.coli.
Describe how the project has the potential to improve water quality and/or increase water quantity, both over the short and long term. Address run-off, erosion, soil infiltration, and flooding, if applicable.
*
Compliance
This project will be meet all standards and specifications of NRCS. All environmental and cultural evaluations and clearances will take place as part of the NRCS standard. All practices will be installed using the State of Utah contracting, allowing site mangers to author, oversee, and inspect the projects.
Description of efforts, both completed and planned, to bring the proposed action into compliance with any and all cultural resource, NEPA, ESA, etc. requirements. If compliance is not required enter "not applicable" and explain why not it is not required.
*
Methods
This treatment will include aerial seeding, mastication, follow-up seeding, fencing, and grazing management. Aerial seeding will be done with a diversified mix of grasses and forbs before mastication in early fall. Due to the nature of the terrain the option to use fixed wing or helicopter will be determined by the contractor. Seed will be obtained from the Great Basin Research Center (GBRC). Mastication will be completed with at least three (preferably multiple), mobile, tracked or wheeled, hydraulically or PTO driven, mechanical mulching/shredder (Bullhog) shall be furnished on a fully-operational basis, with a competent, fully-qualified operator, and shall be capable of mulching/shredding live trees up to twenty-six (26) inches in diameter at twelve inches above ground level measured on the uphill side, per state contract. Grazing management will be no grazing for 2 growing seasons in treated areas, grazing will be monitored and grazing agreements will be signed prior commencement to the project.
Describe the actions, activities, tasks to be implemented as part of the proposed project; how these activities will be carried out, equipment to be used, when, and by whom.
*
Monitoring
Water quality will continue to monitored by UDEQ during the months of April-November. Comparing data from 2006 to current will allow us to see if water quality has improved with treatments and, grazing and irrigation practice changes. NRCS will contract practice 645-Upland Wildlife Habitat Management, which will require two years of rest from livestock grazing and a stubble height of 16" following two growing seasons of rest from livestock grazing. A grazing management plan will be included but will not be a contracted item. A UDWR range trend site will be proposed determine effects from livestock and wildlife utilization. Producer has agreed to have a site established. This will provide long term data and trend of the site. Using the data from the migration initiative collared deer movements can be monitored. This will show if there is hold over in these treatment areas, if hunting pressure is affecting the deer, if weather changes timing, or duration of migration, and use of private lands verses public lands.
Describe plans to monitor for project success and achievement of stated objectives. Include details on type of monitoring (vegetation, wildlife, etc.), schedule, assignments and how the results of these monitoring efforts will be reported and/or uploaded to this project page. If needed, upload detailed plans in the "attachments" section.
*
Partners
Private Landowners will contribute their assistance from the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) to the project. Utah Division Wildlife Resources hold the data associated with the migration initiative and a will potentially set up a vegetation trend monitoring site on the project. A Farm Bill Biologist will also contract and implement the project, as well as continue to plan it. Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ) will continue to monitor water quality and produce annual reports. UDEQ will also be a major part of the change in classification as water quality improves. Natural Resource Conservation Service-is working with the landowners to plan and carry out the project. Through Environmental Quality Incentive Program potential funding will be available. Utah Department of Agricultural and Food is a firm supporter of the project and encourages this project to be funding in an effort to improve working relations between land managers and landowners. USFWS will be providing funding/planning/implementation support and is one of the project managers working closely with Stan Gurley from NRCS/UDWR on work directly tied to private land. USFWS, working with the UDWR, will likely be applying for grant funding through a public-private partnership between the Department of the Interior (DOI), the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF), and ConocoPhillips. This funding comes because of Secretarial Order 3362 which is to improve the habitat conditions in big game migration corridors and winter range areas. This project is an identified migration corridor. Zion National Park-supports efforts to reduce E. coli in the North Fork of the Virgin River. U.S Fish and Wildlife Service is a supporter of the project and encourages it completion to for other non-game and sensitive species found in this unique habitat.
List any and all partners (agencies, organizations, NGO's, private landowners) that support the proposal and/or have been contacted and included in the planning and design of the proposed project. Describe efforts to gather input and include these agencies, landowners, permitees, sportsman groups, researchers, etc. that may be interested/affected by the proposed project. Partners do not have to provide funding or in-kind services to a project to be listed.
*
Future Management
Currently there is nothing keeping livestock from utilizing irrigated riparian areas during irrigation. Because of the lack of forage in the uplands and the PJ invasion the forage is lacking. The mastication and seeding will provide at the very least an alternative forage for livestock and wildlife that is not in the riparian pastures. There is some fencing that has formed a buffer along the stream, but the pastures receive heavy pressure from livestock and wildlife. Future management will include grazing the uplands throughout the year, then using the riparian pasture as a gathering pasture after irrigation is done for the year. This will reduce the amount of fecal matter washed into the stream and create a better buffer to stop run off into the stream. The private landowners will enter into a contract with USFWS. As part of the landowner agreement with USFWS the landowner agrees to leave the habitat restored in place for a 10 year period and during that time will work with the USFWS biologist to monitor and access needs, success, and any needed adaptive management.
Detail future methods or techniques (including administrative actions) that will be implemented to help in accomplishing the stated objectives and to insure the long term success/stability of the proposed project. This may include: post-treatment grazing rest and/or management plans/changes, wildlife herd/species management plan changes, ranch plans, conservation easements or other permanent protection plans, resource management plans, forest plans, etc.
*
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources
Private lands are primarily for livestock production. Both cattle and sheep are grazed on respective private lands. Increasing the forage will allow for better management and decrease the threat of over utilization. Wildlife is abundant in the area and of high interest to public and private stakeholders in the area. Wildlife viewing and hunt takes place on the property and on the adjacent public land. There is also yurt that is for rent during the summer and fall. The rental business depends has become successful because of the natural beauty and the wildlife in the area. The project site and surrounding area is an extremely important asset to the state of Utah for tourism. The Zion Narrows trail head runs through the property and treatment area. The Zion Narrows is one of the worlds premier hiking destinations people from all over the world. THE LANDOWNER PROVIDES ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC FOR TRAIL ACCESS THROUGH THE NARROWS. A large stand of ponderosa pine exists on the private ground and there is interest in harvesting timber. This area is part of the Zion Mule Deer Herd Unit. The area provides highly sought after general season hunting opportunities for mule deer. The private land is NOT open to hunting but provides very important habitat that helps sustain the areas mule deer herd.
Potential for the proposed action to improve quality or quantity of sustainable uses such as grazing, timber harvest, biomass utilization, recreation, etc. Grazing improvements may include actions to improve forage availability and/or distribution of livestock.
Title Page
Project Details
Finance
Species
Habitats
Seed
Comments
Images/Documents
Completion Form
Project Summary Report