Skip to Content
Main Menu
Search
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Projects
Maps
About Us
Register
Login
Search
Saving...
Thank you for requesting access to WRI.
An administrator will contact you with further details.
Green River District 2019 (WRI 2020) Seeding
Region: Northeastern
ID: 5004
Project Status: Completed
Map This Project
Export Project Data
Project Details
*
Need for Project
The project area is already infested with invasive cheatgrass. The area was treated with plateau herbicide the fall of 2018 to help reduce the cover of cheatgrass. The need for the seeding treatment is to establish desired species that will help compete with the cheatgrass. The Miner's Draw fuels fuel break will establish areas that will contain fire tolerant species to help prevent future fires in the area. The project area contains crucial deer winter range, year long pronghorn habitat, and is within a sage grouse PHMA and SGMA.
Provide evidence about the nature of the problem and the need to address it. Identify the significance of the problem using a variety of data sources. For example, if a habitat restoration project is being proposed to benefit greater sage-grouse, describe the existing plant community characteristics that limit habitat value for greater sage-grouse and identify the changes needed for habitat improvement.
*
Objectives
The first phase of the project was completed in October 2018. Herbicide (plateau) was applied to the burned areas to help reduce the cover of cheatgrass. The second phase of the project will consist of drill seeding 1897 acres in areas that were previously treated in 2018. The overall objective is to reduce the potential of future fires within these areas as well as establishing desirable species, while decreasing invasive species.
Provide an overall goal for the project and then provide clear, specific and measurable objectives (outcomes) to be accomplished by the proposed actions. If possible, tie to one or more of the public benefits UWRI is providing.
*
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?)
The main threat to the burned areas will be an increase in invasive species, which would increase fire frequency. If the area is not seeded with desirable species that are also fire tolerant, the cheatgrass cover will increase, increasing the risk of future fires. As cheatgrass cover increases, native species will also decrease. If the cheatgrass cover continues to increase, future restoration will become even more difficult. With an increase in cheatgrass cover, the area will be more susceptible to burning.
LOCATION: Justify the proposed location of this project over other areas, include publicly scrutinized planning/recovery documents that list this area as a priority, remote sensing modeling that show this area is a good candidate for restoration, wildlife migration information and other data that help justify this project's location.
TIMING: Justify why this project should be implemented at this time. For example, Is the project area at risk of crossing an ecological or other threshold wherein future restoration would become more difficult, cost prohibitive, or even impossible.
*
Relation to Management Plans
The proposed project is in compliance with the Presidents Executive Order 13855 - Promoting active management of America's forest, rangelands and other federal lands to improve conditions and reduce wildfire risk. Green River District Fire Management Plan, Miner's Draw Fuels Reduction EA, Vernal Field Office Weed Plan, and the Vernal 2008 RMP ROD. The project would also meet the objectives in the Utah Conservation Plan for Greater Sage-grouse (January 2019), Utah Mule Deer Statewide Management Plan, Wildlife Action Plan, and Utah Pronghorn Management Plan. Vernal RMP FIRE-4- Hazardous fuel reduction activities will be implemented primarily through the use of prescribed fire and managed wildland fire. In some cases, chemical and/or mechanical treatments will be used in conjunction with fire. Where social and/or resource constraints preclude the use of fire, mechanical and/or chemical treatments will be used. FIRE-5- Criteria for developing hazardous fuel reduction priorities will consist of the following: * Areas of Fire Regime Condition Class 2 and 3 * Areas where the potential risk of losing keystone ecosystem species is present * Areas where threats to private/public property exist VEG-1 - Allow mechanical, fire, biological, or chemical control of noxious weeds and insect infestations within the resource planning area with restrictions to protect desired ground cover and water quality. Use the type of manipulation appropriate to and consistent with other land use objectives. VEG-4 - Manage the vegetation to attain the ecological stage that will benefit wildlife in crucial habitat and livestock grazing. Manage vegetation in remaining areas that results in high vegetation species diversity. VEG-9 - Manage the vegetation to attain the ecological stage that will: * Ensure sustainability; * Meet authorized use allocations (such as livestock and wildlife); and * Ensure species diversity. VEG-10 - Manage the vegetative types to achieve the desired mix of seral stages, as outlined in the ROD page 134. Utah Greater Sage-grouse Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment: MA-VEG-1: In PHMA, where necessary to meet GRSG habitat objectives, treat areas to maintain and expand healthy GRSG habitat (e.g., conifer encroachment areas and annual grasslands). MA-FIRE-1: In collaboration with the USFWS and relevant state agencies, complete and maintain GRSG Landscape Wildland Fire and Invasive Species Habitat Assessments to prioritize at risk habitats, and identify fuels management, preparedness, suppression and restoration priorities necessary to maintain sagebrush habitat to support interconnecting GRSG populations. These assessments and subsequent assessment updates will also be a collaborative effort to take into account other GRSG priorities identified in this plan. Appendix H describes a minimal framework example and suggested approach for this assessment. Vernal Fire Management Plan: Fire Management Objectives: Management objectives of the Vernal Resource Management Plan state: 1) Allow mechanical, fire, biological, or chemical control of noxious weeds and insect infestations within the resource planning area with restrictions to protect desired ground cover and water quality. Use the type of manipulation appropriate to and consistent with other land use objectives. Utah Statewide Pronghorn Management Plan: B. Habitat Management Goal: Assure sufficient habitat is available to sustain healthy and productive pronghorn populations. Objective 1: Maintain or enhance the quantity and quality of pronghorn habitat to allow populations to increase. Strategies: a. Identify crucial pronghorn habitats and work with public and private land managers to protect and enhance those areas. c. Work with public land management agencies to minimize, and where necessary, mitigate loss or degradation of pronghorn habitat. e. Under the Utah Watershed Restoration Initiative, design, implement, and monitor the effectiveness of habitat improvement projects to benefit pronghorn. Utah Elk Statewide Management Plan: B. Habitat Management Goal: Conserve and improve elk habitat throughout the state. Habitat Objective 1: Maintain sufficient habitat to support elk herds at population objectives and reduce competition for forage between elk and livestock. Strategies: B. Habitat Management a) Coordinate with land management agencies and private landowners to properly manage and improve elk habitat, especially calving and wintering areas. C. Watershed Restoration Initiative a) Increase forage production by annually treating a minimum of 40,000 acres of elk habitat. b) Coordinate with land management agencies, conservation organizations, private landowners, and local leaders through the regional Watershed Restoration Initiative working groups to identify and prioritize elk habitats that are in need of enhancement or restoration. Habitat Objective 2: Reduce adverse impacts to elk herds and elk habitat. Strategies: C. Noxious Weed Control a) Work with land management agencies and county weed boards to control the spread of noxious and invasive weeds throughout the range of elk in Utah. Utah Mule Deer Statewide Management Plan: Habitat Goal: Conserve, improve, and restore mule deer habitat throughout the state with emphasis on crucial ranges. Habitat Objective 2: Improve the quality and quantity of vegetation for mule deer on a minimum of 500,000 acres of crucial range by 2019. Strategies: d. Initiate broad scale vegetative treatment projects to improve mule deer habitat with emphasis on drought or fire damaged sagebrush winter ranges, ranges that have been taken over by invasive annual grass species, and ranges being diminished by encroachment of conifers into sagebrush or aspen habitats, ensuring that seed mixes contain sufficient forbs and browse species. e. Continue to support and provide leadership for the Utah Watershed Restoration Initiative, which emphasizes improving sagebrush-steppe, aspen, and riparian habitats throughout Utah.
List management plans where this project will address an objective or strategy in the plan. Describe how the project area overlaps the objective or strategy in the plan and the relevance of the project to the successful implementation of those plans. It is best to provide this information in a list format with the description immediately following the plan objective or strategy.
*
Fire/Fuels
In the fall of 2018, a herbicide treatment (plateau) was completed in the project area. The herbicide treatment will help decrease the cover of cheatgrass allowing more desirable species to compete and be established. The proposed drill seeding would be completed the fall of 2019. Fuel breaks, containing fire tolerant species, will be established. The reduction of cheatgrass cover and establishment of more fire resistant species will reduce the risk of future fires.
If applicable, detail how the proposed project will significantly reduce the risk of fuel loading and/or continuity of hazardous fuels including the use of fire-wise species in re-seeding operations. Describe the value of any features being protected by reducing the risk of fire. Values may include; communities at risk, permanent infrastructure, municipal watersheds, campgrounds, critical wildlife habitat, etc. Include the size of the area where fuels are being reduced and the distance from the feature(s) at risk.
*
Water Quality/Quantity
Establishment of vegetation will stabilize soils, which reduces erosion, and increases the soil infiltration. The proposed seeding would reduce the cover of invasive species while changing the vegetation class to more desirable species. Cheatgrass can cause changes in soil moisture and compete with native vegetation for nutrients and sunlight, resulting in a negative result for water quantity at a site specific level. Weed management/monitoring would occur annually. The seeded areas will be rested for at least two growing seasons to allow for the establishment of more desirable species.
Describe how the project has the potential to improve water quality and/or increase water quantity, both over the short and long term. Address run-off, erosion, soil infiltration, and flooding, if applicable.
*
Compliance
The Green River District/Fuels team has completed the EA for the Miner's Draw Fuels Reduction and is currently completing the fire rehab plan for the West Raven Fire Rehab. The Vernal Field Office has an approved programmatic EA for treating weeds throughout the field office.
Description of efforts, both completed and planned, to bring the proposed action into compliance with any and all cultural resource, NEPA, ESA, etc. requirements. If compliance is not required enter "not applicable" and explain why not it is not required.
*
Methods
A rangeland drill provided by UDWR will be used to plant the seed.
Describe the actions, activities, tasks to be implemented as part of the proposed project; how these activities will be carried out, equipment to be used, when, and by whom.
*
Monitoring
Pre/post photo points, including drone footage, and LPI transects were established before the herbicide treatment. The sites will be re-read post seeding. The areas will also be monitored for the presence of noxious and invasive weeds. Results will be uploaded into the database.
Describe plans to monitor for project success and achievement of stated objectives. Include details on type of monitoring (vegetation, wildlife, etc.), schedule, assignments and how the results of these monitoring efforts will be reported and/or uploaded to this project page. If needed, upload detailed plans in the "attachments" section.
*
Partners
The project area contains mostly BLM lands with some SITLA. The grazing permittee was contacted and consulted on the above work. The seeded areas will be rested for two growing seasons. BLM has a contract with Uintah County to spray weeds in areas identified by the BLM. Uintah County may be utilized for follow-up weed spraying if necessary. UDWR will administer the contract and provide the seed and drill for the project.
List any and all partners (agencies, organizations, NGO's, private landowners) that support the proposal and/or have been contacted and included in the planning and design of the proposed project. Describe efforts to gather input and include these agencies, landowners, permitees, sportsman groups, researchers, etc. that may be interested/affected by the proposed project. Partners do not have to provide funding or in-kind services to a project to be listed.
*
Future Management
Phase I, herbicide treatment was completed in the fall of 2018. The second phase, drill seeding, would be completed the fall of 2019. Follow up treatments would include future herbicide treatments for noxious and invasive species and additional seeding if needed. The permittee will continue to use most of the allotments, while avoiding using seeded areas.
Detail future methods or techniques (including administrative actions) that will be implemented to help in accomplishing the stated objectives and to insure the long term success/stability of the proposed project. This may include: post-treatment grazing rest and/or management plans/changes, wildlife herd/species management plan changes, ranch plans, conservation easements or other permanent protection plans, resource management plans, forest plans, etc.
*
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources
The proposed project would improve the availability and quality/quantity of forage for livestock and big game. The seeding will help establish more desirable species while reducing invasive cheatgrass. After the seeded areas have rested, grazing will continue to occur within the area.
Potential for the proposed action to improve quality or quantity of sustainable uses such as grazing, timber harvest, biomass utilization, recreation, etc. Grazing improvements may include actions to improve forage availability and/or distribution of livestock.
Title Page
Project Details
Finance
Species
Habitats
Seed
Comments
Images/Documents
Completion Form
Project Summary Report