Skip to Content
Main Menu
Search
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Projects
Maps
About Us
Register
Login
Search
Saving...
Thank you for requesting access to WRI.
An administrator will contact you with further details.
Payson Allotment Water System Repair
Region: Central
ID: 5046
Project Status: Cancelled
Map This Project
Export Project Data
Project Details
*
Need for Project
Much of the water systems on the Payson livestock allotment, including troughs, fencing, piping ect. were damaged by the Bald mountain and Pole creek fires of 2018 and flooding events after. These water systems are critical in providing livestock with water and allowing better grazing distribution on the allotment. Wildlife also benefit from these dependable water sources. These water systems will have to be repaired before livestock grazing can return to this allotment.
Provide evidence about the nature of the problem and the need to address it. Identify the significance of the problem using a variety of data sources. For example, if a habitat restoration project is being proposed to benefit greater sage-grouse, describe the existing plant community characteristics that limit habitat value for greater sage-grouse and identify the changes needed for habitat improvement.
*
Objectives
Replace livestock water systems, previously utilized by livestock and wildlife, damaged by the Pole Creek/ Bald Mountain fires. This could include redeveloping existing springs, replacing damaged pipelines and troughs and recreating spring enclosures if needed.
Provide an overall goal for the project and then provide clear, specific and measurable objectives (outcomes) to be accomplished by the proposed actions. If possible, tie to one or more of the public benefits UWRI is providing.
*
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?)
Spring sources will be at risk of damage by trampling if these water facilities are not repaired
LOCATION: Justify the proposed location of this project over other areas, include publicly scrutinized planning/recovery documents that list this area as a priority, remote sensing modeling that show this area is a good candidate for restoration, wildlife migration information and other data that help justify this project's location.
TIMING: Justify why this project should be implemented at this time. For example, Is the project area at risk of crossing an ecological or other threshold wherein future restoration would become more difficult, cost prohibitive, or even impossible.
*
Relation to Management Plans
1. The proposed projects will address some of the habitat management strategies outlined in the deer and elk management plans for herd units 16 A and B (Central Mountains, Manti and Nebo) including: Continue to improve and restore sagebrush steppe habitats critical to deer according to DWRs Habitat Initiative. Maintain habitat quantity and quality at a level adequate to support the stated population objectives while at the same time not resulting in an overall downward trend in range condition and watershed quality. Work cooperatively with land management agencies and private landowners to plan and implement improvement projects for the purpose of enhancing wildlife habitat and range resources in general. 2. The project also helps fulfill the state mule deer management plan section IV Habitat Goal: Conserve and improve mule deer habitat throughout the state with emphasis on crucial ranges. 3. The proposed projects will address the following goals and objectives of the Division of Wildlife Resources most recent strategic management plan: Resource Goal: expand wildlife populations and conserve sensitive species by protecting and improving wildlife habitat. Objective 1: protect existing wildlife habitat and improve 500,000 acres of critical habitats and watersheds throughout the state. Objective 3: conserve sensitive species to prevent them from becoming listed as threatened or endangered. Constituency Goal: Achieve broad-based support for Division programs and budgets by demonstrating the value of wildlife to all citizens of Utah. NRCS initiatives batching period For purposes of this subaccount, disasters include but are not limited to floods, wildfires, and drought that occur on or before the batching deadline. Disasters must be declared by local, state, or the federal government agencies with authorities to make such designations to request federal assistance, unless otherwise described below. All wildfires will be considered disasters. The boundaries of active fires will be extended based on actual burned areas. Areas outside the burn areas affected by firefighting efforts are eligible
List management plans where this project will address an objective or strategy in the plan. Describe how the project area overlaps the objective or strategy in the plan and the relevance of the project to the successful implementation of those plans. It is best to provide this information in a list format with the description immediately following the plan objective or strategy.
*
Fire/Fuels
Not applicable
If applicable, detail how the proposed project will significantly reduce the risk of fuel loading and/or continuity of hazardous fuels including the use of fire-wise species in re-seeding operations. Describe the value of any features being protected by reducing the risk of fire. Values may include; communities at risk, permanent infrastructure, municipal watersheds, campgrounds, critical wildlife habitat, etc. Include the size of the area where fuels are being reduced and the distance from the feature(s) at risk.
*
Water Quality/Quantity
This project will improve water quantity and quality for livestock and wildlife on the allotment. Repairing this water system will also protect spring sources from harm or damage allowing them to remain clean and intact for long term wildlife and livestock use.
Describe how the project has the potential to improve water quality and/or increase water quantity, both over the short and long term. Address run-off, erosion, soil infiltration, and flooding, if applicable.
*
Compliance
This proposal only includes the replacements of existing damaged infrastructure. NEPA and cultural resource clearances are not required, The Forest Service will ensure any additional compliance needs are met.
Description of efforts, both completed and planned, to bring the proposed action into compliance with any and all cultural resource, NEPA, ESA, etc. requirements. If compliance is not required enter "not applicable" and explain why not it is not required.
*
Methods
This project will redevelop 2 different springs on that allotment. This includes digging in the spring area, collecting water with a head box, burying attached HDPE pipe to a aluminum water trough by gravity. This proposal is looking to tack on helicopter time that haul in fencing materials to some of the remote areas it will be installed in.
Describe the actions, activities, tasks to be implemented as part of the proposed project; how these activities will be carried out, equipment to be used, when, and by whom.
*
Monitoring
Function and maintenance of water systems will be conducted by the permittees and the local Forest Service range conservationist. No other monitoring is needed at this time.
Describe plans to monitor for project success and achievement of stated objectives. Include details on type of monitoring (vegetation, wildlife, etc.), schedule, assignments and how the results of these monitoring efforts will be reported and/or uploaded to this project page. If needed, upload detailed plans in the "attachments" section.
*
Partners
US Forest Service, Payson Livestock Grazing Association, Utah Division of Wildlife UDWR, Utah Grazing Improvement Program GIP, Natural Resources Conservation Service NRCS were all involved in several coordination meetings to asses and discuss damaged to the allotment and to develop a plan and obtain funding to replace damaged infrastructure so the allotment can return to it's previous full use.
List any and all partners (agencies, organizations, NGO's, private landowners) that support the proposal and/or have been contacted and included in the planning and design of the proposed project. Describe efforts to gather input and include these agencies, landowners, permitees, sportsman groups, researchers, etc. that may be interested/affected by the proposed project. Partners do not have to provide funding or in-kind services to a project to be listed.
*
Future Management
Function and maintenance of water systems will be conducted by the permittees and the local Forest Service range conservationist.
Detail future methods or techniques (including administrative actions) that will be implemented to help in accomplishing the stated objectives and to insure the long term success/stability of the proposed project. This may include: post-treatment grazing rest and/or management plans/changes, wildlife herd/species management plan changes, ranch plans, conservation easements or other permanent protection plans, resource management plans, forest plans, etc.
*
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources
All livestock water resources stem from springs present on the landscape. When these high profile areas are not developed and protected for multi species use they are often damaged and overused. Redeveloping these water resources will ensure these sensitive areas are protected and will be able to accommodate multi species use as long as water is present in the system.
Potential for the proposed action to improve quality or quantity of sustainable uses such as grazing, timber harvest, biomass utilization, recreation, etc. Grazing improvements may include actions to improve forage availability and/or distribution of livestock.
Title Page
Project Details
Finance
Species
Habitats
Seed
Comments
Images/Documents
Project Summary Report