Skip to Content
Main Menu
Search
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Projects
Maps
About Us
Register
Login
Search
Saving...
Thank you for requesting access to WRI.
An administrator will contact you with further details.
Nash Wash Potholer Trial
Region: Southeastern
ID: 5293
Project Status: Completed
Map This Project
Export Project Data
Project Details
*
Need for Project
The Nash Wash WMA is a historic ranch located along the south Book Cliffs. This property was acquired by the UDWR largely because of its high use and value for mule deer in the winter. You can see numerous deer wintering and large bucks rutting in the fields on this WMA. This property also has a small population of turkeys and chukars. Before it's acquisition, the property was managed as a private ranch with the resources to manage several agricultural fields and pastures. Because of limited time and resources, this property has slowly deteriorated and lost some of the value it once had with many of the fields that once had crops transitioning to cheatgrass and other weeds. There have been efforts in the past to spray weeds and plant native grasses, but very little native species have been able to survive and outcompete the weeds. This project is designed to test the use herbicide and new equipment (potholer) developed by the Colorado Parks and Wildlife to try and control cheatgrass and establish native and introduced species for the benefit of mule deer and upland game.
Provide evidence about the nature of the problem and the need to address it. Identify the significance of the problem using a variety of data sources. For example, if a habitat restoration project is being proposed to benefit greater sage-grouse, describe the existing plant community characteristics that limit habitat value for greater sage-grouse and identify the changes needed for habitat improvement.
*
Objectives
1) Test new equipment for the control of cheatgrass and establishment of perennial plant species. 2) Establish beneficial habitat for mule deer and upland game species.
Provide an overall goal for the project and then provide clear, specific and measurable objectives (outcomes) to be accomplished by the proposed actions. If possible, tie to one or more of the public benefits UWRI is providing.
*
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?)
Because of the dominance of cheatgrass and other annual weed species, there is limited risk in testing new equipment and control efforts in these fields.
LOCATION: Justify the proposed location of this project over other areas, include publicly scrutinized planning/recovery documents that list this area as a priority, remote sensing modeling that show this area is a good candidate for restoration, wildlife migration information and other data that help justify this project's location.
TIMING: Justify why this project should be implemented at this time. For example, Is the project area at risk of crossing an ecological or other threshold wherein future restoration would become more difficult, cost prohibitive, or even impossible.
*
Relation to Management Plans
Nash Wash Management Plan UDWR objectives and mission W-82-R Grant
List management plans where this project will address an objective or strategy in the plan. Describe how the project area overlaps the objective or strategy in the plan and the relevance of the project to the successful implementation of those plans. It is best to provide this information in a list format with the description immediately following the plan objective or strategy.
*
Fire/Fuels
A reduction in fine fuels would be expected if treatment is successful.
If applicable, detail how the proposed project will significantly reduce the risk of fuel loading and/or continuity of hazardous fuels including the use of fire-wise species in re-seeding operations. Describe the value of any features being protected by reducing the risk of fire. Values may include; communities at risk, permanent infrastructure, municipal watersheds, campgrounds, critical wildlife habitat, etc. Include the size of the area where fuels are being reduced and the distance from the feature(s) at risk.
*
Water Quality/Quantity
This project will have limited impact on water quality/quantity.
Describe how the project has the potential to improve water quality and/or increase water quantity, both over the short and long term. Address run-off, erosion, soil infiltration, and flooding, if applicable.
*
Compliance
1 Archaeologist, No survey required for previously disturbed ground., Jan 27 2015 / 2 PMArchaeology, The planned project area will be conducted on an old agricultural field and an area that had previous ground disturbance., Jan 29 2015 / 6 NEPA, No NEPA is required. , Jan 3 2015
Description of efforts, both completed and planned, to bring the proposed action into compliance with any and all cultural resource, NEPA, ESA, etc. requirements. If compliance is not required enter "not applicable" and explain why not it is not required.
*
Methods
The treatment area will fall into one of three categories: 1) Drill seed/No herbicide 2) Drill seed/Herbicide 3) Potholer seed/Herbicide The project will be set up with plots to monitor and compare the different treatment types. The herbicide treatment will consist of Plateau (4 oz/acre) and MSO (1.5 qts/acre) and will be applied using a ground sprayer with a 30 ft boom (80015 fan nozzles, 20psi @ 3 mph = 11 gal/acre) several weeks prior to any seeding treatment. The seeding treatment will be accomplished using either a small ATV drill with boxes for separating small species and grasses, or the new potholer seeding all species through one box.
Describe the actions, activities, tasks to be implemented as part of the proposed project; how these activities will be carried out, equipment to be used, when, and by whom.
*
Monitoring
Treatments will be monitored for at least 2 years following implementation.
Describe plans to monitor for project success and achievement of stated objectives. Include details on type of monitoring (vegetation, wildlife, etc.), schedule, assignments and how the results of these monitoring efforts will be reported and/or uploaded to this project page. If needed, upload detailed plans in the "attachments" section.
*
Partners
Danielle Johnston, Colorado Parks and Wildlife
List any and all partners (agencies, organizations, NGO's, private landowners) that support the proposal and/or have been contacted and included in the planning and design of the proposed project. Describe efforts to gather input and include these agencies, landowners, permitees, sportsman groups, researchers, etc. that may be interested/affected by the proposed project. Partners do not have to provide funding or in-kind services to a project to be listed.
*
Future Management
This project will be monitored for success and future herbicide and seeding treatments may be implemented if needed.
Detail future methods or techniques (including administrative actions) that will be implemented to help in accomplishing the stated objectives and to insure the long term success/stability of the proposed project. This may include: post-treatment grazing rest and/or management plans/changes, wildlife herd/species management plan changes, ranch plans, conservation easements or other permanent protection plans, resource management plans, forest plans, etc.
*
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources
Reduction of annual grasses and increase of perennial species will have a positive impact on forage for both wildlife and livestock
Potential for the proposed action to improve quality or quantity of sustainable uses such as grazing, timber harvest, biomass utilization, recreation, etc. Grazing improvements may include actions to improve forage availability and/or distribution of livestock.
Title Page
Project Details
Finance
Species
Habitats
Seed
Comments
Images/Documents
Completion Form
Project Summary Report