Project Details

Utah's man-made waterfowl management areas are under a constant state of erosion due to the natural inflow and outflow of water and the wave action in large units.  A Long reach track-hoe rental will be used to repair dike erosion.  Also, when water enters Utah's waterfowl management areas from faster moving river systems, water velocity slows.  As water velocity slows sediments drop out of the water and settle in the wetland.  Sedimentation from this process impedes managers' ability to move water effectively.  Long reach track-hoes can be used to clean sedimentation out of channels.  Finally, we may use to long reach track hoe to install access bridges across deeper channels for hunting access.

The demand for replacing and repairing infrastructure on these man-made wetlands is high. Additionally, a new Waterfowl Management Area was created on the Willard Spur. Managers have also worked diligently to improve waterfowl and upland habitat by increasing infrastructure that allows them to divert and control water more efficiently and effectively in order to create high quality habitat. Some of these habitat improvement projects have included new dikes, water control structures, and ditches or channels. Examples of such habitat improvement projects are the Fullenkamp and Teal Lake units at Farmington Bay; and two new  units at Ogden Bay WMA's. The WMA's have also experienced increased traditional and non-traditional recreational use activities, further burdening the roads, dikes, and other infrastructure. Due to the increases mentioned above there is a need to increase capacity and efficiency of the Maintenance Crew.  Therefore, we would like to use a portion of funding from this project to help maintenance crew hire a technician.

Provide evidence about the nature of the problem and the need to address it. Identify the significance of the problem using a variety of data sources. For example, if a habitat restoration project is being proposed to benefit greater sage-grouse, describe the existing plant community characteristics that limit habitat value for greater sage-grouse and identify the changes needed for habitat improvement.

Provide an overall goal for the project and then provide clear, specific and measurable objectives (outcomes) to be accomplished by the proposed actions. If possible, tie to one or more of the public benefits UWRI is providing.

LOCATION: Justify the proposed location of this project over other areas, include publicly scrutinized planning/recovery documents that list this area as a priority, remote sensing modeling that show this area is a good candidate for restoration, wildlife migration information and other data that help justify this project's location.

TIMING: Justify why this project should be implemented at this time. For example, Is the project area at risk of crossing an ecological or other threshold wherein future restoration would become more difficult, cost prohibitive, or even impossible.

List management plans where this project will address an objective or strategy in the plan. Describe how the project area overlaps the objective or strategy in the plan and the relevance of the project to the successful implementation of those plans. It is best to provide this information in a list format with the description immediately following the plan objective or strategy.

If applicable, detail how the proposed project will significantly reduce the risk of fuel loading and/or continuity of hazardous fuels including the use of fire-wise species in re-seeding operations. Describe the value of any features being protected by reducing the risk of fire. Values may include; communities at risk, permanent infrastructure, municipal watersheds, campgrounds, critical wildlife habitat, etc. Include the size of the area where fuels are being reduced and the distance from the feature(s) at risk.

Describe how the project has the potential to improve water quality and/or increase water quantity, both over the short and long term. Address run-off, erosion, soil infiltration, and flooding, if applicable.

Description of efforts, both completed and planned, to bring the proposed action into compliance with any and all cultural resource, NEPA, ESA, etc. requirements. If compliance is not required enter "not applicable" and explain why not it is not required.

Describe the actions, activities, tasks to be implemented as part of the proposed project; how these activities will be carried out, equipment to be used, when, and by whom.

Describe plans to monitor for project success and achievement of stated objectives. Include details on type of monitoring (vegetation, wildlife, etc.), schedule, assignments and how the results of these monitoring efforts will be reported and/or uploaded to this project page. If needed, upload detailed plans in the "attachments" section.

List any and all partners (agencies, organizations, NGO's, private landowners) that support the proposal and/or have been contacted and included in the planning and design of the proposed project. Describe efforts to gather input and include these agencies, landowners, permitees, sportsman groups, researchers, etc. that may be interested/affected by the proposed project. Partners do not have to provide funding or in-kind services to a project to be listed.

Detail future methods or techniques (including administrative actions) that will be implemented to help in accomplishing the stated objectives and to insure the long term success/stability of the proposed project. This may include: post-treatment grazing rest and/or management plans/changes, wildlife herd/species management plan changes, ranch plans, conservation easements or other permanent protection plans, resource management plans, forest plans, etc.

Potential for the proposed action to improve quality or quantity of sustainable uses such as grazing, timber harvest, biomass utilization, recreation, etc. Grazing improvements may include actions to improve forage availability and/or distribution of livestock.