Skip to Content
Main Menu
Search
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Projects
Maps
About Us
Register
Login
Search
Saving...
Thank you for requesting access to WRI.
An administrator will contact you with further details.
FY 2023 Stream Restoration Training
Region: Salt Lake Office
ID: 5912
Project Status: Completed
Map This Project
Export Project Data
Project Details
*
Need for Project
Given the degradation of many instream and riparian habitats throughout Utah, the need for extensive stream restoration is apparent. Currently, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR) restoration biologists are working to address this need; implementing projects on several tributaries throughout Utah. With proper training, more balanced staffing, and an exchange of information among trained UDWR personnel, the number of stream restoration projects undertaken annually throughout Utah can be maintained. However, such an effort will require a division of duties between Habitat and Aquatics section and development of a well-planned training program for UDWR personnel.
Provide evidence about the nature of the problem and the need to address it. Identify the significance of the problem using a variety of data sources. For example, if a habitat restoration project is being proposed to benefit greater sage-grouse, describe the existing plant community characteristics that limit habitat value for greater sage-grouse and identify the changes needed for habitat improvement.
*
Objectives
To train Aquatics and Habitat section personnel in Rosgen stream restoration methodologies, use of beavers in stream restoration, and wetland delineation.
Provide an overall goal for the project and then provide clear, specific and measurable objectives (outcomes) to be accomplished by the proposed actions. If possible, tie to one or more of the public benefits UWRI is providing.
*
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?)
Out-of-state travel restrictions may hamper project completion. Failure to complete restoration of streams due to a lack of trained personnel might jeopardize landowner negotiations for stream access or reduce the success of fisheries management and water quality improvement efforts.
LOCATION: Justify the proposed location of this project over other areas, include publicly scrutinized planning/recovery documents that list this area as a priority, remote sensing modeling that show this area is a good candidate for restoration, wildlife migration information and other data that help justify this project's location.
TIMING: Justify why this project should be implemented at this time. For example, Is the project area at risk of crossing an ecological or other threshold wherein future restoration would become more difficult, cost prohibitive, or even impossible.
*
Relation to Management Plans
Recently, a document entitled; "Guidelines for Regional Stream Restoration Project Staffing and Training Course Attendance (2018 - 2022)" was recently drafted. In an effort, to identify roles and responsibilities regarding stream habitat improvements with in the state, Habitat and Aquatics section personnel in the Salt Lake Office were charged with the development of staffing and training guidelines for UDWR stream restoration biologists. It is anticipated that these guidelines, combined with a list of recent stream restoration efforts, will provide sufficient evidence for allocation of future funds. Trained biologists will undertake projects to address water quality issues related to EPA-approved TMDL. Additionally, well-trained biologists will be able to address threats to conservation species identified in the WAP. Implementation of stream restoration projects will allow for accomplishment of UDWR Aquatics Section strategies related to fish habitat enhancement as outlined in the draft strategic plan.
List management plans where this project will address an objective or strategy in the plan. Describe how the project area overlaps the objective or strategy in the plan and the relevance of the project to the successful implementation of those plans. It is best to provide this information in a list format with the description immediately following the plan objective or strategy.
*
Fire/Fuels
N/A
If applicable, detail how the proposed project will significantly reduce the risk of fuel loading and/or continuity of hazardous fuels including the use of fire-wise species in re-seeding operations. Describe the value of any features being protected by reducing the risk of fire. Values may include; communities at risk, permanent infrastructure, municipal watersheds, campgrounds, critical wildlife habitat, etc. Include the size of the area where fuels are being reduced and the distance from the feature(s) at risk.
*
Water Quality/Quantity
Improvement of fish habitat, albeit the primary purpose of stream restoration undertaken by UDWR personnel, often results in reductions in erosion, sedimentation, TDS, and NPS nutrient loading. For these reasons, DEQ Division of Water Quality fully supports our efforts as part of a concerted effort to improve water quality throughout Utah.
Describe how the project has the potential to improve water quality and/or increase water quantity, both over the short and long term. Address run-off, erosion, soil infiltration, and flooding, if applicable.
*
Compliance
Compliance requirements (e.g., NEPA, Clean Water Act, Section 7 clearances) are addressed by biologists completing this training.
Description of efforts, both completed and planned, to bring the proposed action into compliance with any and all cultural resource, NEPA, ESA, etc. requirements. If compliance is not required enter "not applicable" and explain why not it is not required.
*
Methods
Funding from this project will be used to: (1) pay for pre-registration, registration, and out-of-state travel costs for 3 Aquatic Section biologists attending Rosgen training, (2) pay for pre-registration, registration, and out-of-state travel costs for 2 Aquatics Section biologists attending wetland delineation training, and (3) pay for pre-registration, registration, and in-state travel costs for 2 Aquatic Section biologists and 3 Habitat Section biologists attending Sediment Transport in Stream Assessment and Design offered at Utah State University.
Describe the actions, activities, tasks to be implemented as part of the proposed project; how these activities will be carried out, equipment to be used, when, and by whom.
*
Monitoring
N/A
Describe plans to monitor for project success and achievement of stated objectives. Include details on type of monitoring (vegetation, wildlife, etc.), schedule, assignments and how the results of these monitoring efforts will be reported and/or uploaded to this project page. If needed, upload detailed plans in the "attachments" section.
*
Partners
N/A
List any and all partners (agencies, organizations, NGO's, private landowners) that support the proposal and/or have been contacted and included in the planning and design of the proposed project. Describe efforts to gather input and include these agencies, landowners, permitees, sportsman groups, researchers, etc. that may be interested/affected by the proposed project. Partners do not have to provide funding or in-kind services to a project to be listed.
*
Future Management
Trained biologists will be able to assist with or conduct stream restoration efforts throughout Utah for multiple years. Additionally, trained wetland delineators will provide asssistance with USACE permitting for all projects.
Detail future methods or techniques (including administrative actions) that will be implemented to help in accomplishing the stated objectives and to insure the long term success/stability of the proposed project. This may include: post-treatment grazing rest and/or management plans/changes, wildlife herd/species management plan changes, ranch plans, conservation easements or other permanent protection plans, resource management plans, forest plans, etc.
*
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources
N/A
Potential for the proposed action to improve quality or quantity of sustainable uses such as grazing, timber harvest, biomass utilization, recreation, etc. Grazing improvements may include actions to improve forage availability and/or distribution of livestock.
Title Page
Project Details
Finance
Species
Habitats
Seed
Comments
Images/Documents
Completion Form
Project Summary Report