Skip to Content
Main Menu
Search
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Projects
Maps
About Us
Register
Login
Search
Saving...
Thank you for requesting access to WRI.
An administrator will contact you with further details.
Block Grant for UDWR Wildlife Action Plan Implementation - FY 2021
Region: Statewide
ID: 6388
Project Status: Completed
Map This Project
Export Project Data
Project Details
*
Need for Project
This project provides the required state match for virtually all of Utah's annual allocation of federal State Wildlife Grants. The programs sustained by this project collect, maintain, consume, and distribute a variety of data and information streams for state-designated sensitive species, Species of Greatest Conservation Need, federally-listed T&E species, and some key habitats. These programs are the Utah Natural Heritage Program, WAP project leadership, and the Native Aquatics and Native Terrestrial species programs. Besides working on occurrence data and data gaps, this project also contributes threat abatement capacity for SGCNs and key habitats.
Provide evidence about the nature of the problem and the need to address it. Identify the significance of the problem using a variety of data sources. For example, if a habitat restoration project is being proposed to benefit greater sage-grouse, describe the existing plant community characteristics that limit habitat value for greater sage-grouse and identify the changes needed for habitat improvement.
*
Objectives
The goal of this project is to prevent the need for species listings under the Endangered Species Act. This goal will be pursued through the following objectives: - Priority threat-abatement actions are implemented -- whether identified in the 2015 WAP, or in other management plans as they pertain to SGCNs and key habitats. - Utah's SGCN species are inventoried, monitored, and managed. - Populations of regional SGCN species are maintained and enhanced. - Regional sensitive species databases are maintained, accessible, and utilized. - Habitat management guidelines are developed as needed for key species based on existing literature, ongoing UDWR studies, and project monitoring results.
Provide an overall goal for the project and then provide clear, specific and measurable objectives (outcomes) to be accomplished by the proposed actions. If possible, tie to one or more of the public benefits UWRI is providing.
*
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?)
LOCATION: Justify the proposed location of this project over other areas, include publicly scrutinized planning/recovery documents that list this area as a priority, remote sensing modeling that show this area is a good candidate for restoration, wildlife migration information and other data that help justify this project's location.
TIMING: Justify why this project should be implemented at this time. For example, Is the project area at risk of crossing an ecological or other threshold wherein future restoration would become more difficult, cost prohibitive, or even impossible.
*
Relation to Management Plans
This project forms the foundation of UDWR's efforts to implement the 2015 Wildlife Action Plan. Without it, most - perhaps all - of the other WAP implementation efforts such as those of the Watershed Restoration Initiative as well as those of the partners listed below, would wither and perhaps cease in short order. Those other efforts now contribute more direct and in-kind funding to WAP implementation than ESMF and State Wildlife Grants combined. The staff funded by this project are also absolutely critical to implementation and periodic revision of several Species Recovery Implementation Plans, a pair of Habitat Conservation Plans, a host of Conservation Agreements and Strategies, and several other state species management plans such as those for Utah prairie dog, the bats of Utah, and greater sage-grouse. Most of the objectives and actions listed in those other plans also cross-reference easily with the objectives and actions enumerated in the WAP. Finally, staff funded by this project also participate in the review, revision, and implementation of diverse partners' plans, such as Resource Management Plans and Forest Plans.
List management plans where this project will address an objective or strategy in the plan. Describe how the project area overlaps the objective or strategy in the plan and the relevance of the project to the successful implementation of those plans. It is best to provide this information in a list format with the description immediately following the plan objective or strategy.
*
Fire/Fuels
If applicable, detail how the proposed project will significantly reduce the risk of fuel loading and/or continuity of hazardous fuels including the use of fire-wise species in re-seeding operations. Describe the value of any features being protected by reducing the risk of fire. Values may include; communities at risk, permanent infrastructure, municipal watersheds, campgrounds, critical wildlife habitat, etc. Include the size of the area where fuels are being reduced and the distance from the feature(s) at risk.
*
Water Quality/Quantity
Describe how the project has the potential to improve water quality and/or increase water quantity, both over the short and long term. Address run-off, erosion, soil infiltration, and flooding, if applicable.
*
Compliance
The Utah Natural Heritage Program is the repository of, and the portal for requesting, sensitive species point occurrence data. It manages Government Records Access and Management Act compliance for these data in relations between state agencies as well as with academia, industry, and the public. UNHP helps other UDWR programs comply with GRAMA by processing external requests for sensitive species data. The Native Aquatics and Terrestrial species programs enable effective compliance with the state Sensitive Species Rule. The Native Aquatics program is an important component of effective Clean Water Act compliance by virtue of its role in Stream Alteration Permit application review, as well as its role in developing applications for such permits made by UDWR for stream habitat restoration projects. All work conducted with federally-listed species will be done in full compliance with Endangered Species Act provisions.
Description of efforts, both completed and planned, to bring the proposed action into compliance with any and all cultural resource, NEPA, ESA, etc. requirements. If compliance is not required enter "not applicable" and explain why not it is not required.
*
Methods
Conservation actions for SGCN species and key habitats that will be accomplished under this proposal can roughly be categorized as on-the-ground work, impact analysis, inventory/monitoring, research, education, data management, coordination, and planning. Selected, but by no means exhaustive, examples of work expected this year follow: - Impact analysis: Work with UDWR biologists, federal land managers, and others to recognize and make recommendations to avoid/minimize/mitigate impacts to wildlife from development proposals; review all Watershed Restoration Initiative habitat-project proposals; help create distribution and/or habitat maps for species for use in the impact analysis process; review various permit requests; respond to any ESA listing petitions. - Inventory/monitoring: Work to identify species' occurrences, population status, and response to threats and management actions; design, analyze, synthesize, and supervise field projects. - Research: Address questions vital to management. We have internal projects, we work with local and distant universities, and we participate in regional- or national-scale efforts. - Education/outreach/dissemination: Citizen science efforts, public lectures, and field experiences; bird and nature festivals; manuscript preparation for peer-reviewed scientific journals; social media posts. Serve as the regional experts for all nongame-related questions and media requests. - Data management, coordination, and planning: WAP implementation coordination and planning; Species Status Assessment (SSA) data submission, participation, and review; Conservation Action Planning (CAP) for species and areas; UDWR strategic plan; coordination and communication with federal land management biologists; participation in many initiatives, teams, and working groups including WRI, candidate species working groups, species-specific recovery teams, etc; discovering, creating, entering, proofing, approving, and sharing species and habitat data. For many of the listed activities, we seek additional funding through ESMF and other state, federal, and private sources. Those funds are generally for seasonal field costs such as technicians, vehicles, supplies and materials, and other implementation costs. However, without this essential grant, we would lack the capacity to carry out most, if not all, of the duties of the Native Aquatic and Terrestrial Wildlife Conservation Programs.
Describe the actions, activities, tasks to be implemented as part of the proposed project; how these activities will be carried out, equipment to be used, when, and by whom.
*
Monitoring
Species monitoring -- whether annual, periodic, or occasional -- is a key ongoing activity of this proposal. Information on SGCN population status, and response to conservation actions, is vital to guide management and inform Species Status Assessments. Methods and timelines vary by species. All results will however be incorporated into periodic status and threat assessments for all SGCNs, which will constitute the cumulative monitoring for all SGCNs statewide, as well as provide some indication of program effectiveness.
Describe plans to monitor for project success and achievement of stated objectives. Include details on type of monitoring (vegetation, wildlife, etc.), schedule, assignments and how the results of these monitoring efforts will be reported and/or uploaded to this project page. If needed, upload detailed plans in the "attachments" section.
*
Partners
An extraordinarily diverse set of partners work with the employees funded by this project. Among the federal partners are: NPS, USFWS, BLM, USFS, NRCS, USACE, and DoD. Among the state partners are DEQ, UDAF, UDOT, and several of the sister divisions within the DNT, most notably UGS. Besides executive-branch agencies, there are various universities (BYU, USU, UofU, UVU, SUU, etc) and a plethora of NGOs such as -- but not limited to -- Trout Unlimited, The Nature Conservancy, HawkWatch International, Hogle Zoo, and Tracey Aviary.
List any and all partners (agencies, organizations, NGO's, private landowners) that support the proposal and/or have been contacted and included in the planning and design of the proposed project. Describe efforts to gather input and include these agencies, landowners, permitees, sportsman groups, researchers, etc. that may be interested/affected by the proposed project. Partners do not have to provide funding or in-kind services to a project to be listed.
*
Future Management
The most important next step is to secure reliable long-term funding for the positions and activities sustained by this project. Completing that step will liberate $700,000 of ESMF money annually for other projects, as well as remove a constant source of strain and friction on individual staff and relationships. Barring secure funding, the long-term success and stability of this project will be in perpetual suspense.
Detail future methods or techniques (including administrative actions) that will be implemented to help in accomplishing the stated objectives and to insure the long term success/stability of the proposed project. This may include: post-treatment grazing rest and/or management plans/changes, wildlife herd/species management plan changes, ranch plans, conservation easements or other permanent protection plans, resource management plans, forest plans, etc.
*
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources
Potential for the proposed action to improve quality or quantity of sustainable uses such as grazing, timber harvest, biomass utilization, recreation, etc. Grazing improvements may include actions to improve forage availability and/or distribution of livestock.
Title Page
Project Details
Finance
Species
Habitats
Seed
Comments
Images/Documents
Completion Form
Project Summary Report