Project Details

The purpose of this project is to improve Wyoming (Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis), Mountain (Artemisia tridentata ssp. vasseyena), and Black sagebrush (Artemisia nova) communities in the Bald Hills Greater Sage-Grouse PHMA and the Parowan Front mule deer winter range. Big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) is poorly adapted to fire, owing to its inability to resprout after top-kill in addition to short seed longevity and dispersal distances, and thus it often requires restoration intervention after fires (Young & Evans 1989; Wagstaff & Welch 1990). Reestablishing big sagebrush is considered a priority in the conservation and rehabilitation of sagebrush steppe ecosystems. Wyoming big sagebrush communities are typically found on warm dry sites and have low resilience and resistance to disturbance and management. This project aims to address Lowland Sagebrush habitat threats including Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity (Very High), Invasive Plant Species -- Non-native (Very High), and Drought (High) by increasing sagebrush abundance. This project supports the strategy for management describe in the Utah WAP for developing new plant materials and restoration techniques suited to this habitat. Restoration of Wyoming big sagebrush is necessary to maintain ecosystem resilience and provide habitat for a large number of wildlife species including the imperiled greater sage-grouse. This project specifically addresses Greater Sage-grouse threats to Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity (Very High), Invasive Plant Species -- Non-native (High), and Droughts (Medium), by increasing sagebrush within the area. Multiple wildfires have occurred on public lands managed by the Cedar City Field Office (CCFO) BLM which have decreased healthy sagebrush communities. Approximately 35,000 acres of sagebrush has burned in the past 15-years within the Bald Hills Greater Sage-Grouse PHMA. Adequate sagebrush cover is becoming a limiting factor to provide for health and viability of sage grouse in portions of the Bald Hills PHMA and wildfire has dramatically affected seasonal sage-grouse habitats throughout the Bald Hills PHMA. In addition to wildfire, the amount of available crucial mule deer winter habitat along the Parowan Front has been greatly reduced by the construction of Interstate Highway 15 (I-15) as well as other human developments. This project also specifically addresses mule deer threats to Invasive Plant Species -- Non-native (High) and Droughts (Medium) through increasing sagebrush cover. This project will address the Pygmy Rabbit threats from Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity (Very High), Invasive Plant Species -- Non-native (High), and Brush Eradication / Vegetation Treatments (High). Replanting the sagebrush component to these areas will restore Pygmy Rabbit habitat to what it was prior to the wildfires.

Provide evidence about the nature of the problem and the need to address it. Identify the significance of the problem using a variety of data sources. For example, if a habitat restoration project is being proposed to benefit greater sage-grouse, describe the existing plant community characteristics that limit habitat value for greater sage-grouse and identify the changes needed for habitat improvement.

The goal of this project is to improve the conditions of the Wyoming sagebrush communities by hand planting approximately 200,000 bare-root Wyoming big sagebrush seedlings, and approximately 115,000 container Mountain sagebrush/Black sagebrush. The project has several additional objectives including maintaining adequate habitat components to meet the needs of sage grouse nesting, brood-rearing and winter habitats in accordance with current guidelines and in coordination with UDWR and SWARM while providing for other wildlife values. Another objective is to create large, un-fragmented blocks of sagebrush habitat with a variety of seral stages, which would meet the seasonal needs of sage grouse and mule deer. 
Identification of planting areas would consider multiple variables including soils, perennial and invasive annual grass percent cover, ecological site descriptions including associated state and transition models, existing telemetry data (sage grouse and mule deer) that has been collected in the project area, and findings from other recent handplanting projects (Davidson BE, Germino MJ, Richardson B, Barnard DM (2019) Landscape and organismal factors affecting sagebrush-seedling transplant survival after megafire restoration. Restoration Ecology 27:1008-1020). Approximately 15,000 acres of habitat has been identified as possible site locations for the hand planting of sagebrush. In the coming months this will be narrowed down, so only 10% of the 15,000 acres will be planted. The original polygons will be reduced once the weather changes and more accurate locations can be identified in the field. The total estimated acres treated would be 1,656.

Provide an overall goal for the project and then provide clear, specific and measurable objectives (outcomes) to be accomplished by the proposed actions. If possible, tie to one or more of the public benefits UWRI is providing.

This project would be within and complimentary to WRI projects 6481 (Neck Drill Seeding/Plateau), 6793 (Neck Drill Seedling/Plateau), 5152 (2019 Neck Fire ESR), 2493 (Baboon Fire ESR), 5210 (Buckhorn Flat/Swayback Knoll), 6815 (Buckhorn Flat -- Chaining), and 6214 (Fremont -- Buck Horn North).

The planting areas are currently in an early seral state (i.e. perennial grass/forb dominated) as a result of wildfire. The project would be expected to move the project area to a mid-seral state (i.e. perennial grass, forb and shrub dominated). The project would be expected to improve habitat conditions for sage grouse and mule deer. Fall planting is proposed because this would reduce the time bare-root sagebrush seedlings are lifted from the nursery to planting. Additionally, the fall may provide more time for seedlings to develop adequate root systems before drought stress. The Cedar City Field Office BLM has recognized this area for restoration and funding has become available through the BLM Greater Sage Grouse Restoration program as well as Inflation Reduction Act to restore and connect terrestrial wildlife habitat.

LOCATION: Justify the proposed location of this project over other areas, include publicly scrutinized planning/recovery documents that list this area as a priority, remote sensing modeling that show this area is a good candidate for restoration, wildlife migration information and other data that help justify this project's location.

TIMING: Justify why this project should be implemented at this time. For example, Is the project area at risk of crossing an ecological or other threshold wherein future restoration would become more difficult, cost prohibitive, or even impossible.

The handplanting of sagebrush was authorized under the Shrub and Forb Planting Project Environmental Assessment (DOI-BLM-UT-C010-2021-0023-EA).

BLM Utah Greater Sage-Grouse Approved Resource Management Plan 2015 
A. The project is consistent with the SGARMP (2015) goals, objectives and Management Actions that were identified in the Special Status Species section as follows: Special Status Species Goal: Maintain and/or increase GRSG abundance and distribution by conserving, enhancing or restoring the sagebrush ecosystem upon which populations depend in collaboration with other conservation partners. Refer to the following Objectives and Management Actions in the SGRMPA (Objectives: SSS-3, SSS-4, SSS-5) and Management Actions (MA-SSS-4, MA-SSS-6, MA-SSS7). 
B. The project is also consistent with the SGARMP (2015) objectives and Management Actions that were identified in the Vegetation section as follows: Refer to the following Objectives and Management Actions in the SGRMPA (MA-VEG-1, MA-VEG-2, MA-VEG-4, MA-VEG-5, MA-VEG-6, MA-VEG-8, MA-VEG-9, MA-VEG-10, MA-VEG-12 and MA-VEG-14). 
C. The project is also consistent with the SGARMP (2015) Management Actions that were identified in the Fire and Fuels Management section as follows: Refer to the following Management Actions in the SGRMPA (MA-FIRE-1 and MA-FIRE-3) 
D. The project is also consistent with the SGARMP (2015) Management Actions that were identified in the Livestock Grazing/Range Management section as follows: Refer to the following Management Actions in the SGRMPA (MA-LG-3, MA-LG-4, MA-LG-5, MA-LG-12, MALG- 13, MA-LG-16 and MA-LG-17). 
The Conservation Plan for Greater Sage-grouse in Utah was approved by the Governor in April 2013. The plan establishes incentive-based conservation programs for conservation of sage-grouse on private, local government, and School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration lands and regulatory programs on other state- and federally managed lands. The Conservation Plan also establishes sage-grouse management areas and implements specific management protocols in these areas. 
The Utah Greater Sage-grouse Management Plan in 2009 identified threats and issues affecting sage-grouse management in Utah as well as goals, objectives, and strategies intended to guide UDWR, local working groups, and land managers efforts to protect, maintain, and improve sage-grouse populations and habitats and balance their management with other resource uses.
Southwest Desert Local Working Group Conservation Plan 2009. The local Working Group has developed a Conservation Plan detailing the natural history, threats, and mitigation measures for sage-grouse in each conservation plan area; and conservation guidelines for any activities occurring in the area. The Utah State Wildlife Action Plan 2015-2025 (Final) is a comprehensive management plan designed to conserve native species populations and habitats in Utah and prevent the need for additional federal listings. Please refer to attached excerpts from the Utah State Wildlife Action Plan 2015-2025 that identify Strategy for Management (Pg. 41 and Pg. 50). 
Cedar Beaver Garfield Antimony Resource Management Plan Resource Management Plan (1986). Although the Project Area was not specifically discussed in the RMP vegetation treatments were identified throughout the Field Office. 
Southwest Utah Support Area Fire Management Plan (May, 2006) The SUSAFMP identifies the Black Mountains as a priority for conversion of encroached pinyon and juniper dominated communities to a sagebrush community with a diverse component of perennial grasses, forbs and shrubs. This would be consistent with the vegetative monitoring data that has been collected within the Project Area to identify the Ecological Site Description. 
National Fire Plan (2000), BLM National Sage Grouse Habitat Conservation Strategy (2004) The project is also consistent with the NFP. The goals and objectives of the NFP is to manage BLM administered public land to maintain, enhance and restore sagebrush habitats while ensuring multiple use and sustained yield goals of FLPMA. Goals/Strategies identified in the NFP include the following: 1. Provide guidance to ensure integration of sage-grouse habitat conservation measures for actions provided through the management in land use planning process. 2. Issue mandatory guidance on management of sagebrush habitat for sage-grouse conservation. 3. Enhance knowledge of resource conditions and priorities in order to support habitat maintenance and restoration efforts. 4. Complete and maintain eco-regional assessments of sagebrush and sage-grouse habitats across the sagebrush biome. 5. Provide a consistent and scientifically based approach for collection and use of monitoring data for sagebrush habitats, sage-grouse and other components of the sagebrush community. 6. Identify, prioritize and facilitate needed research to develop relevant information for sage-grouse and sagebrush habitat conservation 7. Maintain, develop and expand partnerships to promote cooperation and support for all activities associated with sage-grouse and sagebrush conservation. 8. Effectively communicate throughout BLM and with current and prospective partners on steps BLM will take to conserve sage-grouse and sage-grouse and sagebrush habitats. 9. Facilitate the collection, transfer and sharing of information among all BLM partners and cooperators, as well as BLM program personnel. 10. Develop BLM state-level strategies and/or plans for sage-grouse and sagebrush conservation on BLM administered public lands. 
Southwest Desert Deer Herd Unit Management Plan - Bald Hills area the project will be consistent with the habitat management strategies identified in the Deer Herd Unit Management Plan for Deer Herd Unit #20 (Southwest Desert) (UDWR) which pertain to the Project Area are as follows: * Evaluate and implement potential habitat improvement projects on BLM, state, and private lands. * Evaluate opportunities to address problems created by closed canopy pinyon pine and juniper. 
Panguitch Lake Deer Herd Unit Management Plan Parowan Front area The project will be consistent with the habitat management strategies identified in the Deer Herd Unit Management Plan for Deer Herd Unit #28 (Panguitch Lake) (UDWR) which pertain to the Project Area are as follows: * Evaluate and implement potential habitat improvement projects on BLM, state, and private lands. * Evaluate opportunities to address problems created by closed canopy pinyon pine and juniper. 
Utah Pronghorn Statewide Management Plan (2009) Habitat Management Objective, under the Utah Watershed Restoration Initiative, design, implement, and monitor the effectiveness of habitat improvement projects to benefit pronghorn. 
Coordinated Implementation Plan for Bird Conservation in Utah (2005) The priority habitat identified for this area was shrub-steppe, which was identified as a Priority A (High threat, high opportunity, and high value to birds statewide) habitat. Priority birds identified within this area include sage grouse, ferruginous hawk, sage sparrow, and Brewer's sparrow. Sagebrush restoration was identified as an opportunity within this area to address concerns with sagebrush die-off and potential for cheatgrass invasion.

List management plans where this project will address an objective or strategy in the plan. Describe how the project area overlaps the objective or strategy in the plan and the relevance of the project to the successful implementation of those plans. It is best to provide this information in a list format with the description immediately following the plan objective or strategy.

If applicable, detail how the proposed project will significantly reduce the risk of fuel loading and/or continuity of hazardous fuels including the use of fire-wise species in re-seeding operations. Describe the value of any features being protected by reducing the risk of fire. Values may include; communities at risk, permanent infrastructure, municipal watersheds, campgrounds, critical wildlife habitat, etc. Include the size of the area where fuels are being reduced and the distance from the feature(s) at risk.

Describe how the project has the potential to improve water quality and/or increase water quantity, both over the short and long term. Address run-off, erosion, soil infiltration, and flooding, if applicable.

Description of efforts, both completed and planned, to bring the proposed action into compliance with any and all cultural resource, NEPA, ESA, etc. requirements. If compliance is not required enter "not applicable" and explain why not it is not required.

Describe the actions, activities, tasks to be implemented as part of the proposed project; how these activities will be carried out, equipment to be used, when, and by whom.

During the planting implementation approximately one monitoring plot would be established per unit. An established monitoring plot would be 1/5 of an acre. All planted seedlings within the established plot would be recorded at time of planting. In subsequent years, monitoring would occur at the established plot and data collected and counted, live, dead, or missing. Additional monitoring may consist of data collection on vegetation cover within a 1m2 quadrat around each seedling. Each 1m2 quadrat vegetation cover would estimate cover by functional group (all combinations of native or exotic, annual or perennial, grasses or forbs) in 5% increments up to 40% cover, and in 10% increments from 40-100% cover. Photo points would also be established to qualitatively monitor how the vegetation changes over time.

Additionally, in coordination with USU Extension a Modified-Whittaker Nested Vegetation Sampling Method (Stohlgren et. al. 1995) may be used to monitor the treatment area. Monitoring data may be collected for 3-5 years to determine treatment effectiveness. A monitoring report with data summaries and photos would be completed and uploaded to the WRI project website.

Describe plans to monitor for project success and achievement of stated objectives. Include details on type of monitoring (vegetation, wildlife, etc.), schedule, assignments and how the results of these monitoring efforts will be reported and/or uploaded to this project page. If needed, upload detailed plans in the "attachments" section.

List any and all partners (agencies, organizations, NGO's, private landowners) that support the proposal and/or have been contacted and included in the planning and design of the proposed project. Describe efforts to gather input and include these agencies, landowners, permitees, sportsman groups, researchers, etc. that may be interested/affected by the proposed project. Partners do not have to provide funding or in-kind services to a project to be listed.

Detail future methods or techniques (including administrative actions) that will be implemented to help in accomplishing the stated objectives and to insure the long term success/stability of the proposed project. This may include: post-treatment grazing rest and/or management plans/changes, wildlife herd/species management plan changes, ranch plans, conservation easements or other permanent protection plans, resource management plans, forest plans, etc.

Potential for the proposed action to improve quality or quantity of sustainable uses such as grazing, timber harvest, biomass utilization, recreation, etc. Grazing improvements may include actions to improve forage availability and/or distribution of livestock.