Skip to Content
Main Menu
Search
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Projects
Maps
About Us
Register
Login
Search
Saving...
Thank you for requesting access to WRI.
An administrator will contact you with further details.
Participation in Utah Federally Listed Species Status Review Partnership - FY26
Region: Salt Lake Office
ID: 7397
Project Status: Proposed
Map This Project
Export Project Data
Project Details
*
Need for Project
Investments from the state and other partners in listed species recovery have been significant since the passage of the Endangered Species Act more than 50 years ago. With the investments that have been made, partners should be seeing success in the form of delisting or downlisting species. Some of Utah's species should be considered for regulatory status changes, but the US Fish and Wildlife Service, without this partnership, does not have the staff needed to work through the lengthy status review and regulatory process to delist or downlist a species.
Provide evidence about the nature of the problem and the need to address it. Identify the significance of the problem using a variety of data sources. For example, if a habitat restoration project is being proposed to benefit greater sage-grouse, describe the existing plant community characteristics that limit habitat value for greater sage-grouse and identify the changes needed for habitat improvement.
*
Objectives
Objective 1 - Use criteria (considerations) for evaluating Utah's listed species for delisting or downlisting consideration to update species in the queue for consideration. Objective 2 - Implement the regulatory process to consider species for delisting or downlisting based on those identified in Objective 1.
Provide an overall goal for the project and then provide clear, specific and measurable objectives (outcomes) to be accomplished by the proposed actions. If possible, tie to one or more of the public benefits UWRI is providing.
*
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?)
N/A
LOCATION: Justify the proposed location of this project over other areas, include publicly scrutinized planning/recovery documents that list this area as a priority, remote sensing modeling that show this area is a good candidate for restoration, wildlife migration information and other data that help justify this project's location.
TIMING: Justify why this project should be implemented at this time. For example, Is the project area at risk of crossing an ecological or other threshold wherein future restoration would become more difficult, cost prohibitive, or even impossible.
*
Relation to Management Plans
Listed species under consideration may have specific recovery plans that are considered during this effort.
List management plans where this project will address an objective or strategy in the plan. Describe how the project area overlaps the objective or strategy in the plan and the relevance of the project to the successful implementation of those plans. It is best to provide this information in a list format with the description immediately following the plan objective or strategy.
*
Fire/Fuels
N/A
If applicable, detail how the proposed project will significantly reduce the risk of fuel loading and/or continuity of hazardous fuels including the use of fire-wise species in re-seeding operations. Describe the value of any features being protected by reducing the risk of fire. Values may include; communities at risk, permanent infrastructure, municipal watersheds, campgrounds, critical wildlife habitat, etc. Include the size of the area where fuels are being reduced and the distance from the feature(s) at risk.
*
Water Quality/Quantity
N/A
Describe how the project has the potential to improve water quality and/or increase water quantity, both over the short and long term. Address run-off, erosion, soil infiltration, and flooding, if applicable.
*
Compliance
The regulatory process identified in the Endangered Species Act will be followed to ensure compliance with the Act.
Description of efforts, both completed and planned, to bring the proposed action into compliance with any and all cultural resource, NEPA, ESA, etc. requirements. If compliance is not required enter "not applicable" and explain why not it is not required.
*
Methods
Methods initially include applying the established Criteria (Considerations) for Evaluating Utah's Listed Species for Delisting or Downlisting Consideration to develop a short list of species that meet the criteria for consideration. Once a short list is established and agreed to by Partners, the regulatory process as defined under the Endangered Species Act and US Fish and Wildlife Service policies is implemented. This regulatory process includes: 1) conducting a Species Status Assessment that includes the recommendation of whether a change in regulatory status should be considered; 2) if a change in regulatory status is recommended, an internal US Fish and Wildlife Service review team determines whether to move forward with a formal status change recommendation; 3) a proposed status change is published in the Federal Register with a public comment period; 4) public comments are considered by the US Fish and Wildlife Service and if nothing is submitted to change their proposed status change, the final rule to change the species status is published in the Federal Register, typically one year after it is proposed.
Describe the actions, activities, tasks to be implemented as part of the proposed project; how these activities will be carried out, equipment to be used, when, and by whom.
*
Monitoring
Post delisting monitoring is a requirement under the Endangered Species Act for species successfully ushered through the delisting process.
Describe plans to monitor for project success and achievement of stated objectives. Include details on type of monitoring (vegetation, wildlife, etc.), schedule, assignments and how the results of these monitoring efforts will be reported and/or uploaded to this project page. If needed, upload detailed plans in the "attachments" section.
*
Partners
Partners to this effort include: US Fish and Wildlife Service Utah Department of Natural Resources, Division of Wildlife Resources US Department of the Interior, CUPCA Completion Office US Bureau of Reclamation US Bureau of Land Management Utah Reclamation Mitigation and Conservation Commission Central Utah Water Conservancy District Public Lands Policy Coordination Office
List any and all partners (agencies, organizations, NGO's, private landowners) that support the proposal and/or have been contacted and included in the planning and design of the proposed project. Describe efforts to gather input and include these agencies, landowners, permitees, sportsman groups, researchers, etc. that may be interested/affected by the proposed project. Partners do not have to provide funding or in-kind services to a project to be listed.
*
Future Management
Once a species is downlisted or delisted, conservation needs for the species does not end. But without being federally listed, species management returns to the state Division of Wildlife Resources (for 'protected wildlife'). Specific species may be managed under a state-led conservation agreement under the umbrella of the Utah Wildlife Action Plan.
Detail future methods or techniques (including administrative actions) that will be implemented to help in accomplishing the stated objectives and to insure the long term success/stability of the proposed project. This may include: post-treatment grazing rest and/or management plans/changes, wildlife herd/species management plan changes, ranch plans, conservation easements or other permanent protection plans, resource management plans, forest plans, etc.
*
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources
As species are down/delisted from ESA, management of wildlife species returns to the State. This provides the potential to improve quality or quantity of sustainable uses.
Potential for the proposed action to improve quality or quantity of sustainable uses such as grazing, timber harvest, biomass utilization, recreation, etc. Grazing improvements may include actions to improve forage availability and/or distribution of livestock.
Title Page
Project Details
Finance
Species
Habitats
Seed
Comments
Images/Documents
Project Summary Report