Skip to Content
Main Menu
Search
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Projects
Maps
About Us
Register
Login
Search
Saving...
Thank you for requesting access to WRI.
An administrator will contact you with further details.
Pine Valley WCSL 2025-2026 Heritage Surveys
Region: Southern
ID: 7658
Project Status: Current
Map This Project
Export Project Data
Project Details
*
Need for Project
Class 3 Heritage surveys are required prior to implement terrestrial activities within these project areas. Nepa is anticipated to be signed in April/May 2025. This project implements the required class 3 surveys.
Provide evidence about the nature of the problem and the need to address it. Identify the significance of the problem using a variety of data sources. For example, if a habitat restoration project is being proposed to benefit greater sage-grouse, describe the existing plant community characteristics that limit habitat value for greater sage-grouse and identify the changes needed for habitat improvement.
*
Objectives
Obtain class III Heritage surveys and reports to inform future terrestrial vegetation implementation activities to reduce risks to communities, infrastructure corridors and natural resources.
Provide an overall goal for the project and then provide clear, specific and measurable objectives (outcomes) to be accomplished by the proposed actions. If possible, tie to one or more of the public benefits UWRI is providing.
*
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?)
Heritage Surveys are required for vegetation manipulating activities. Clearances have generally been a bottleneck in getting project implemented. This project will get the overall WCSL 1 to 2 years head in heritage clearances allowing project implementation to be smoother, planned further in advance and allow implementation to occur at the desired time of year to meet objectives.
LOCATION: Justify the proposed location of this project over other areas, include publicly scrutinized planning/recovery documents that list this area as a priority, remote sensing modeling that show this area is a good candidate for restoration, wildlife migration information and other data that help justify this project's location.
TIMING: Justify why this project should be implemented at this time. For example, Is the project area at risk of crossing an ecological or other threshold wherein future restoration would become more difficult, cost prohibitive, or even impossible.
*
Relation to Management Plans
Nepa for this project is currently in process. The Pine Valley Wildfire Risk Reduction Project decision that will authorize the future activities is anticipated to be signed in April/May of 2025. This Decision will tie to the Dixie Land Management Plan, the National Cohesive fire strategy and The WCSL strategies. These surveys will provide the groundwork for tying to the Pine Valley and Utah State mule deer plans, the Pine Valley Pronghorn Plan, and the Utah Statewide Elk management plan.
List management plans where this project will address an objective or strategy in the plan. Describe how the project area overlaps the objective or strategy in the plan and the relevance of the project to the successful implementation of those plans. It is best to provide this information in a list format with the description immediately following the plan objective or strategy.
*
Fire/Fuels
These surveys will have a direct impact on future fire and fuels reduction activities to be implemented once the decision is signed.
If applicable, detail how the proposed project will significantly reduce the risk of fuel loading and/or continuity of hazardous fuels including the use of fire-wise species in re-seeding operations. Describe the value of any features being protected by reducing the risk of fire. Values may include; communities at risk, permanent infrastructure, municipal watersheds, campgrounds, critical wildlife habitat, etc. Include the size of the area where fuels are being reduced and the distance from the feature(s) at risk.
*
Water Quality/Quantity
These surveys will not have an impact to water quality/quantity.
Describe how the project has the potential to improve water quality and/or increase water quantity, both over the short and long term. Address run-off, erosion, soil infiltration, and flooding, if applicable.
*
Compliance
These surveys are part of the compliance process.
Description of efforts, both completed and planned, to bring the proposed action into compliance with any and all cultural resource, NEPA, ESA, etc. requirements. If compliance is not required enter "not applicable" and explain why not it is not required.
*
Methods
100 percent pedestrian surveys will be completed on the 3 project areas.
Describe the actions, activities, tasks to be implemented as part of the proposed project; how these activities will be carried out, equipment to be used, when, and by whom.
*
Monitoring
Other than contract monitoring during the contract process and completion, no monitoring is needed.
Describe plans to monitor for project success and achievement of stated objectives. Include details on type of monitoring (vegetation, wildlife, etc.), schedule, assignments and how the results of these monitoring efforts will be reported and/or uploaded to this project page. If needed, upload detailed plans in the "attachments" section.
*
Partners
UTDWR and UTFFSL
List any and all partners (agencies, organizations, NGO's, private landowners) that support the proposal and/or have been contacted and included in the planning and design of the proposed project. Describe efforts to gather input and include these agencies, landowners, permitees, sportsman groups, researchers, etc. that may be interested/affected by the proposed project. Partners do not have to provide funding or in-kind services to a project to be listed.
*
Future Management
The Dixie National Forest is proposing to carry out large, landscape-level vegetation treatments as part of the ongoing efforts to confront the wildfire crisis, protect communities, and improve resilience on the Pine Valley Ranger District (Confronting the Wildfire Crisis: A Strategy for Protecting Communities and Improving Resilience in America's Forests) with in the WCSL. These six projects are anticipated to be the initial focus areas once the decision is sign and activities developed.
Detail future methods or techniques (including administrative actions) that will be implemented to help in accomplishing the stated objectives and to insure the long term success/stability of the proposed project. This may include: post-treatment grazing rest and/or management plans/changes, wildlife herd/species management plan changes, ranch plans, conservation easements or other permanent protection plans, resource management plans, forest plans, etc.
*
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources
The decision will consider sustainable uses of natural resources. These surveys help identify resources to consider.
Potential for the proposed action to improve quality or quantity of sustainable uses such as grazing, timber harvest, biomass utilization, recreation, etc. Grazing improvements may include actions to improve forage availability and/or distribution of livestock.
Title Page
Project Details
Finance
Species
Habitats
Seed
Comments
Images/Documents
Completion Form
Project Summary Report