Skip to Content
Main Menu
Search
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Projects
Maps
About Us
Register
Login
Search
Saving...
Thank you for requesting access to WRI.
An administrator will contact you with further details.
Powell Ranger District Water Enhancement
Region: Southern
ID: 7926
Project Status: Proposed
Map This Project
Export Project Data
Project Details
*
Need for Project
Water is crucial for wildlife populations in Southern Utah. Research has shown that body condition of Mule Deer going into winter is directly correlated to their survival. By improving water storage on summer range we can disperse wildlife on the landscape allowing them to access better feed along with not having to travel long distance for water. This will improve body condition and overall survival.
Provide evidence about the nature of the problem and the need to address it. Identify the significance of the problem using a variety of data sources. For example, if a habitat restoration project is being proposed to benefit greater sage-grouse, describe the existing plant community characteristics that limit habitat value for greater sage-grouse and identify the changes needed for habitat improvement.
*
Objectives
Repair holding tanks and plumbing to wildlife drinker that was burned in the France Canyon Fire. Clean and Bentonite 10 ponds near table mountain, that are silted in and in need of repair. Repair springs and pertinent infrastructure that was damaged in the France Canyon fire.
Provide an overall goal for the project and then provide clear, specific and measurable objectives (outcomes) to be accomplished by the proposed actions. If possible, tie to one or more of the public benefits UWRI is providing.
*
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?)
Proctor canyon has great habitat for wildlife, but lacks perennial water. This guzzler will provide water to keep wildlife distributed across the landscape. Table mountains has great wildlife habitat but lacks live water. There are some existing ponds, but they are no longer working. By repairing these ponds we can distribute wildlife across the landscape allowing them to access better forage, resulting in better body condition and overall survival.
LOCATION: Justify the proposed location of this project over other areas, include publicly scrutinized planning/recovery documents that list this area as a priority, remote sensing modeling that show this area is a good candidate for restoration, wildlife migration information and other data that help justify this project's location.
TIMING: Justify why this project should be implemented at this time. For example, Is the project area at risk of crossing an ecological or other threshold wherein future restoration would become more difficult, cost prohibitive, or even impossible.
*
Relation to Management Plans
The proposed project is consistent with and supported by the following management plans: I. Dixie National Forest - Land and Resource Management plan - pp. IV-84, Standard: A. Maintain habitat capability at a level at least 80 % of potential capability for all emphasized species. And. pp. IV-112, 6A management direction, (1) Maintain and manage forested inclusions to provide a high level of forage production, wildlife habitat, and diversity. II. Garfield County current desired future conditions and Draft resource management plan. pp. 5 Wildlife Goal: Prior to December 31, 2025, land managers will seek to have habitats supporting important fish and wildlife species. III. Utah Statewide Elk Management Plan pp. 16, Strategies: C. Watershed Restoration Initiative, a) Increase forage production by annually treating a minimum of 40,000 acres of elk habitat. and b) Coordinate with land management agencies, conservation organizations, private landowners, and local leaders through the regional WRI working groups to identify and prioritize elk habitats in need of enhancement or restoration. IV. Utah Mule Deer Statewide Management Plan, 2025. pp. 20-22 - Habitat Goal: Conserve, improve, and restore mule deer habitat throughout the state with emphasis on crucial ranges. Habitat Objective 1: Maintain mule deer habitat throughout the state by protecting and enhancing existing crucial habitats and mitigating for losses due to natural and human impacts. Strategies: B. Habitat Management and Conservation a. Work with local, state and federal land management agencies via land management plans and with private landowners to identify and actively manage and protect crucial mule deer habitats including summer (especially fawning), winter, and migration areas as defined in Sawyer et al. 2009 I. Wildlife-Friendly Fencing a. Consider installing or modifying wildlife-friendly fencing for effective and safe mule deer movements. Habitat Objective 2: Improve the quality and quantity of vegetation for mule deer on a minimum of 600,000 acres of crucial range by 2030. A. Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative (WRI) a. Utilize WRI as a tool to improve deer habitat with all partners across the state b. Continue to support and provide leadership for WRI, which emphasizes improving sagebrush-steppe, aspen, and riparian habitats throughout Utah c. Work with land management agencies, conservation organizations, private landowners, and local leaders through the regional WRI teams working groups to identify and prioritize mule deer habitats that are in need of enhancement or restoration (Figure 6). Emphasis should be placed on crucial habitats which include summer range habitats such as improving aspen, winter ranges sagebrush habitats, and improving riparian areas e. Initiate broad scale vegetative treatment projects to improve and restore mule deer habitat with emphasis on drought or fire damaged sagebrush winter ranges, ranges that have been taken over by invasive annual grass species, and ranges being diminished by encroachment of conifers into sagebrush or aspen habitats, ensuring that seed mixes contain sufficient forbs and browse species V. Plateau Boulder Deer Herd Management Plan Unit #25C- Objectives: 1) Maintain mule deer habitat throughout the unit by protecting and enhancing existing crucial habitats and mitigating for losses due to natural and human impacts. 2) Encourage vegetation manipulation projects and seeding to increase the availability, abundance and nutritional content of browse, grass, and forb species. Map 2.5: 2018 Desirable Components Index (DCI) ranking distribution by study site for WMU 25B, Thousand Lakes Plateau. 3) Seek cooperative projects and programs to encourage and improve the quality and quantity of deer habitat, with public and private land managers to maintain a stable or upward trend in vegetative composition. 4) Provide improved habitat security and escapement opportunities for mule deer keeping habitat restoration projects a priority for wildlife VI.Utah Elk Statewide Management Plan This project helps to meet Population Objective 2 - Foster support among stakeholders for Utah's elk management program. Specifically, the project helps increase tolerance of public land grazers not enrolled in a CWMU or LOA by conducting habitat projects that will benefit livestock and wildlife. The proposed treatments will also assist with meeting Habitat Objectives 1 - Maintain sufficient habitat to support elk herds at population objectives and reduce competition for forage between elk and livestock.
List management plans where this project will address an objective or strategy in the plan. Describe how the project area overlaps the objective or strategy in the plan and the relevance of the project to the successful implementation of those plans. It is best to provide this information in a list format with the description immediately following the plan objective or strategy.
*
Fire/Fuels
Not applicable to the threat of fire and fuel loading, although the increasing encroachment of pinyon-juniper in the area may take away from the run off of existing snow and rain in the area, allowing for loss of water through overland flow
If applicable, detail how the proposed project will significantly reduce the risk of fuel loading and/or continuity of hazardous fuels including the use of fire-wise species in re-seeding operations. Describe the value of any features being protected by reducing the risk of fire. Values may include; communities at risk, permanent infrastructure, municipal watersheds, campgrounds, critical wildlife habitat, etc. Include the size of the area where fuels are being reduced and the distance from the feature(s) at risk.
*
Water Quality/Quantity
Table Mountain has no live water and through this project we will have a positive impact on water quality and quantity, the re-claying of the ponds, fixing guzzlers and pipelines that were burned during the France canyon fire, will allow for more storage capacity of the water resource and availability of it over the summer months. By catching winter snow loads and seasonal rains we are able to store the water for critical time of year that will benefit wildlife that will use these ponds, guzzlers and pipelines for their watering needs. By the use of re-claying these ponds additional water will allow for better utilization by wildlife.
Describe how the project has the potential to improve water quality and/or increase water quantity, both over the short and long term. Address run-off, erosion, soil infiltration, and flooding, if applicable.
*
Compliance
Dixie National Forest Powell Ranger District has identified the existing these locations as maintenance and no NEPA is required.
Description of efforts, both completed and planned, to bring the proposed action into compliance with any and all cultural resource, NEPA, ESA, etc. requirements. If compliance is not required enter "not applicable" and explain why not it is not required.
*
Methods
Use a excavator to dig up the existing damaged tanks in proctor canyon. We will need to use a Helicopter to bring in the new tanks and fly the old tanks out. We will then set the new tanks run new plumbing to the drinker and do any other repairs that are needed. To clean the ponds on table mountain we will rent a dozer to repair the road along with pushing and cleaning the ponds. We will then haul in bentonite clay to line the ponds so they can better hold water into the future. Replacing 7920 feet of water pipeline that was damaged in the France Canyon fire.
Describe the actions, activities, tasks to be implemented as part of the proposed project; how these activities will be carried out, equipment to be used, when, and by whom.
*
Monitoring
Monitoring will continue on an annual basis, to make sure the projects are functioning properly.
Describe plans to monitor for project success and achievement of stated objectives. Include details on type of monitoring (vegetation, wildlife, etc.), schedule, assignments and how the results of these monitoring efforts will be reported and/or uploaded to this project page. If needed, upload detailed plans in the "attachments" section.
*
Partners
Dixie National Forest Powell Ranger District
List any and all partners (agencies, organizations, NGO's, private landowners) that support the proposal and/or have been contacted and included in the planning and design of the proposed project. Describe efforts to gather input and include these agencies, landowners, permitees, sportsman groups, researchers, etc. that may be interested/affected by the proposed project. Partners do not have to provide funding or in-kind services to a project to be listed.
*
Future Management
We will continue to manage this to be a long term sustainable water source into the future.
Detail future methods or techniques (including administrative actions) that will be implemented to help in accomplishing the stated objectives and to insure the long term success/stability of the proposed project. This may include: post-treatment grazing rest and/or management plans/changes, wildlife herd/species management plan changes, ranch plans, conservation easements or other permanent protection plans, resource management plans, forest plans, etc.
*
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources
These water projects will allow wildlife to disperses onto the landscape and utilize forage that would not be available if the water was not available.
Potential for the proposed action to improve quality or quantity of sustainable uses such as grazing, timber harvest, biomass utilization, recreation, etc. Grazing improvements may include actions to improve forage availability and/or distribution of livestock.
Title Page
Project Details
Finance
Species
Habitats
Seed
Comments
Images/Documents
Project Summary Report