Skip to Content
Main Menu
Search
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Projects
Maps
About Us
Register
Login
Search
Saving...
Thank you for requesting access to WRI.
An administrator will contact you with further details.
Eccles Creek Streambank Reclamation Erosion Control
Region: Southeastern
ID: 4130
Project Status: Completed
Map This Project
Export Project Data
Project Details
*
Need for Project
Seven thousand cubic yards of fill and a 36 inch culvert were removed to restore the Eccles Creek channel bottom in 2015. The resulting stream banks have a slope of 2h:1v, in the narrow canyon beside the paved highway 264. Due to a bend in the highway, road run-off concentrates at the top of the reclaimed slope and has created several, deep erosion rills down the slope to Eccles Creek. Erosion of the slopes is affecting vegetation establishment. Sediment has reached the creek, affecting fish habitat.
Provide evidence about the nature of the problem and the need to address it. Identify the significance of the problem using a variety of data sources. For example, if a habitat restoration project is being proposed to benefit greater sage-grouse, describe the existing plant community characteristics that limit habitat value for greater sage-grouse and identify the changes needed for habitat improvement.
*
Objectives
The objective is to control erosion from the highway to allow establishment of vegetation on the reclaimed south facing slope (approximately 0.2 acre in area). Utah Department of Transportation will construct a roadside ditch and install a culvert at the top of the slope to remove the water from the reclamation area. Excelsior logs will be placed along the contour of the slope to slow sheet wash and fill in existing erosion rills. This project on Eccles Creek will : Stabilize a reclaimed site; Improve water quality; Improve habitat; Improve recreational fishing.
Provide an overall goal for the project and then provide clear, specific and measurable objectives (outcomes) to be accomplished by the proposed actions. If possible, tie to one or more of the public benefits UWRI is providing.
*
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?)
Fine sediments entering the creek will reduce spawning areas and fill in fishing holes and contribute to phosphorus loading in Scofield Reservoir. Colorado Cutthroat Trout are a species of concern in the stream. Mule deer and elk utilize the reclaimed slopes.
LOCATION: Justify the proposed location of this project over other areas, include publicly scrutinized planning/recovery documents that list this area as a priority, remote sensing modeling that show this area is a good candidate for restoration, wildlife migration information and other data that help justify this project's location.
TIMING: Justify why this project should be implemented at this time. For example, Is the project area at risk of crossing an ecological or other threshold wherein future restoration would become more difficult, cost prohibitive, or even impossible.
*
Relation to Management Plans
The 2015 reclamation of Eccles Creek (WRI grant #3352) was completed to allow return the perennial flow in Eccles Creek to a stream channel, to prevent a potential hazard of a blocked culvert, to allow fish migration one mile further upstream, and to increase recreational enjoyment of the stream. (Refer to the images for pictures of the fill in the channel before this work was accomplished.) This project will control erosion of the recently reclaimed slopes, and protect the stream while vegetation becomes established. This area is within the Deer Herd Management Plan for the Manti Unit 16B on lands that winter large herds of deer and elk.
List management plans where this project will address an objective or strategy in the plan. Describe how the project area overlaps the objective or strategy in the plan and the relevance of the project to the successful implementation of those plans. It is best to provide this information in a list format with the description immediately following the plan objective or strategy.
*
Fire/Fuels
The fill and culvert were removed from Eccles Creek in 2015 to allow free flow of water in the channel should there be flooding as a result of a natural disaster, such as wildfire.
If applicable, detail how the proposed project will significantly reduce the risk of fuel loading and/or continuity of hazardous fuels including the use of fire-wise species in re-seeding operations. Describe the value of any features being protected by reducing the risk of fire. Values may include; communities at risk, permanent infrastructure, municipal watersheds, campgrounds, critical wildlife habitat, etc. Include the size of the area where fuels are being reduced and the distance from the feature(s) at risk.
*
Water Quality/Quantity
This project addresses the impacts of highway run-off, in cooperation with the Utah Department of Transportation. This project will implement sediment control to improve soil infiltration and promote vegetation establishment on the slopes above the creek. Stabilizing the reclaimed slopes is important because Eccles Creek receives mine water discharge from the Skyline Mine (approximately 1.5 miles up stream). In the past year the discharge ranged from 2,000 - 3,000 gpm. The current rate of discharge could increase with the addition of new leases. The reclaimed stream bank must be able to withstand flows above the ordinary. Eccles Creek waters enter Mud Creek and eventually Scofield reservoir, approximately 4 miles down stream. Eccles Creek is protected as a drinking water source and a cold water fishery. Scofield Reservoir has been listed as an impaired water body for phosphorus and dissolved oxygen. Phosphorus may adhere to soil particles in suspension or be in solution in the water.
Describe how the project has the potential to improve water quality and/or increase water quantity, both over the short and long term. Address run-off, erosion, soil infiltration, and flooding, if applicable.
*
Compliance
The project was under Division of Oil, Gas, & Mining as part of a former coal mine site. Archaeological clearance was obtained in 1980 under the Valley Camp Belina #2 Mine. The investigation was titled, Intensive Archaeological Surface Evaluations in the Proposed Whiskey Creek Canyon. Pleasant Valley Project in Carbon County, Utah. 1980. F.R.Hauck, PhD and D.G. Weder. Archaeological Environmental Research Corporation. Paper No. 21. In. 007001 Mining and Reclamation, Appendix 411.140. No cultural or historic sites were found at this stream crossing location. This project be within the boundaries previously surveyed, on reclaimed slopes. No further survey is planned. NEPA is no required on private property on a previously disturbed site.
Description of efforts, both completed and planned, to bring the proposed action into compliance with any and all cultural resource, NEPA, ESA, etc. requirements. If compliance is not required enter "not applicable" and explain why not it is not required.
*
Methods
The Utah Department of Transportation will contract the work to install a road ditch (asphalt or riprap) and an 18-24 inch culvert. The ditch will parallel the highway at the top of the slope. The ditch will direct road runoff to an 18 or 24 inch culvert to be installed perpendicular to the slope. An excavator and motor grader and a laborer will be required. The Division of Oil, Gas & Mining will oversee the installation of excelsior logs at 10 foot intervals along the contour of the north facing slope. The slope is 200 ft long and 45 feet in height above the stream. Therefore, three, 200 ft lengths of excelsior logs will be required. Logs will be set six inches into the ground using shovels and picks. Logs will be anchored with wooden stakes.
Describe the actions, activities, tasks to be implemented as part of the proposed project; how these activities will be carried out, equipment to be used, when, and by whom.
*
Monitoring
DOGM will inspect the site monthly during accessible times of the year (May - November). Vegetation and sediment control will be monitored. Photographs will be uploaded annually. The DOGM water quality database will be used to monitor the water quality at Skyline Mine water monitoring points VC6 (upstream) and VC9 (downstream). Field data and lab analysis collected is as descrbed in Table 2.3.7-1 and 2.7.7.2 of the Skyline Mining and Reclamation Plan. SKyline Mine began in 2007 conducting macro-invertebrate and cutthroat trout surveys every three years. The results of these surveys will be monitored (Skyline Mine MRP, Vol 1A, Sec 2.8, p. 2-71, 2-71A, B, &C and Table 2.8-1a).
Describe plans to monitor for project success and achievement of stated objectives. Include details on type of monitoring (vegetation, wildlife, etc.), schedule, assignments and how the results of these monitoring efforts will be reported and/or uploaded to this project page. If needed, upload detailed plans in the "attachments" section.
*
Partners
On November 15, 2016, Priscilla Burton (soil scientist) and Keenan Storrar (hydrologist) with the Division of Oil Gas & Mining met at the site with Jim Chandler, P.E. and Brian Nielsen from the Utah Department of Transportation to discuss a means of controlling road runoff from highway 264. At this meeting, UDOT agreed to install a hardened road ditch and culvert (as described above). DOGM agreed to find a source of funding to pay for the excelsior logs and their installation. All the work will be put out for bid under the same contract. Darin Caine is the representative of the Oman Family Trust which owns the land. Mr. Caine is an absentee landowner. The filll was removed from Eccles Creek at the request of Mr. Caine and with the concurrence of UDOT (email from Jim Chandler, 1/27/2014). Priscilla Burton has kept Mr. Caine informed of the reclamation work by email and text message/photo.
List any and all partners (agencies, organizations, NGO's, private landowners) that support the proposal and/or have been contacted and included in the planning and design of the proposed project. Describe efforts to gather input and include these agencies, landowners, permitees, sportsman groups, researchers, etc. that may be interested/affected by the proposed project. Partners do not have to provide funding or in-kind services to a project to be listed.
*
Future Management
There is no grazing of these slopes. There will be no further logging of the surrounding land owned by the Oman Trust (Darin Caine).
Detail future methods or techniques (including administrative actions) that will be implemented to help in accomplishing the stated objectives and to insure the long term success/stability of the proposed project. This may include: post-treatment grazing rest and/or management plans/changes, wildlife herd/species management plan changes, ranch plans, conservation easements or other permanent protection plans, resource management plans, forest plans, etc.
*
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources
Water quality in Mud Creek and Scofield benefits livestock.
Potential for the proposed action to improve quality or quantity of sustainable uses such as grazing, timber harvest, biomass utilization, recreation, etc. Grazing improvements may include actions to improve forage availability and/or distribution of livestock.
Title Page
Project Details
Finance
Species
Habitats
Seed
Comments
Images/Documents
Completion Form
Project Summary Report