Skip to Content
Main Menu
Search
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Projects
Maps
About Us
Register
Login
Search
Saving...
Thank you for requesting access to WRI.
An administrator will contact you with further details.
Deadman Creek Native Aquatic Species Restoration
Region: Northern
ID: 4610
Project Status: Completed
Map This Project
Export Project Data
Project Details
*
Need for Project
Brook Trout are present with BCT, NLC, and boreal toad in Deadman Creek. UDWR desires to remove the Brook Trout and have only native aquatic species present. A low dam and pond currently serves as a partial fish barrier and will be reconstructed to serve as a full fish barrier. In addition, the owners of the dam (Uintalands) desire to dredge the pond to improve the recreational fishery. The dam of the upper pond has eroded and a stable dam and spillway is desired.
Provide evidence about the nature of the problem and the need to address it. Identify the significance of the problem using a variety of data sources. For example, if a habitat restoration project is being proposed to benefit greater sage-grouse, describe the existing plant community characteristics that limit habitat value for greater sage-grouse and identify the changes needed for habitat improvement.
*
Objectives
1) Dewater and dredge the lower pond. 2) Install a riser outlet and auxiliary spillway on lower pond. 3) Construct a spillway on upper pond. 4) Complete renovation treatments to remove Brook Trout. 5) Return all native aquatic species back to creek.
Provide an overall goal for the project and then provide clear, specific and measurable objectives (outcomes) to be accomplished by the proposed actions. If possible, tie to one or more of the public benefits UWRI is providing.
*
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?)
Many cutthroat trout populations are lost because of Brook Trout expansion. If Brook Trout are not removed from places where they are present with BCT, then it's likely that the BCT population will be extirpated. Mill Creek and its tributary, Deadman Creek, are a genetically pure population of BCT. One of the main sources of Brook Trout in the drainage is Deadman Creek and this project will eradicate this source of Brook Trout above the constructed barrier. Brook Trout have similar effects on NLC; Deadman Creek is one of 3 extant populations remaining in Utah. In addition, one of six known Boreal Toad breeding locations in the Uinta Mountains exist in Deadman Creek; the eradication of this piscivorous fish would benefit this species. The willingness of Uintalands to allow the use of their dam as a full fish barrier is possible because they would like dredge the pond and improve the dam.
LOCATION: Justify the proposed location of this project over other areas, include publicly scrutinized planning/recovery documents that list this area as a priority, remote sensing modeling that show this area is a good candidate for restoration, wildlife migration information and other data that help justify this project's location.
TIMING: Justify why this project should be implemented at this time. For example, Is the project area at risk of crossing an ecological or other threshold wherein future restoration would become more difficult, cost prohibitive, or even impossible.
*
Relation to Management Plans
Utah Wildlife Action Plan 2015: BCT and Boreal/Western Toad are both N4 species. Northern Leatherside Chub are an N3 species. All three species have listed as a High Threat: Invasive Wildlife Species - Non-native. This restoration project on Deadman Creek will address the removal of the non-native species (Brook Trout) to benefit all three species. UDWR Strategic Plan: this project will help the UDWR meet its Resource Goal, which is to "expand wildlife populations and conserve sensitive species by protecting and improving wildlife habitat. This project will specifically address objectives 2 and 3 of the UDWR Resource Goal, which are to (1) "increase fish and game populations to meet management plan objectives and expand quality fishing and hunting opportunities," and to (2) "conserve sensitive species to prevent them from becoming listed as threatened or endangered." UDWR Upper Bear River Management Plan (hydrologic unit 16010101): Identifies native and nonnative interactions as a resource and biological issue in this watershed [page 9]. Management strategies for BCT include (1) "chemical treatment of streams or lakes to remove nonnative fish" [page 11]. Management strategies for NLC include (2) "removal of nonnative fish species" and (3) "introduction into historical range" [page11]. Bonneville Cutthroat Trout Conservation Agreement and Strategy (signed by all states within historic range): The goal of the BCT CAS is to (1) "ensure the long-term existence of BCT within its historic range [page 2]. Specific actions include (2) the selective control of nonnative species [page 34, sections 4(a, b, and c)], as well as (3) subsequent introduction/re-introduction actions [page 35, sections 5(a, b and c). This project will also help to address the specific objective of additional BCT conservation populations in the Bear River in Utah [Table 2]. The UDWR and the USFWS completed a Utah Northern-region wide environmental assessment (2012) that covers the construction of fish barriers and conducting rotenone treatments. UDWR Rangewide Conservation Agreement and Strategy for Northern leatherside chub: The goal of this effort is to (1) "ensure the long-term persistence of northern leatherside chub within its historic range" by implementing strategies including to (2) "restore populations at selected localities within the historic range" [page 1]. Achievement of this goal requires implementation of conservation elements such as (3) nonnative control and (4) range expansion [pages 5 -- 6], which are proposed for Deadman Creek. Boreal Toad (Bufo boreas boreas) Conservation Plan.
List management plans where this project will address an objective or strategy in the plan. Describe how the project area overlaps the objective or strategy in the plan and the relevance of the project to the successful implementation of those plans. It is best to provide this information in a list format with the description immediately following the plan objective or strategy.
*
Fire/Fuels
Not applicable.
If applicable, detail how the proposed project will significantly reduce the risk of fuel loading and/or continuity of hazardous fuels including the use of fire-wise species in re-seeding operations. Describe the value of any features being protected by reducing the risk of fire. Values may include; communities at risk, permanent infrastructure, municipal watersheds, campgrounds, critical wildlife habitat, etc. Include the size of the area where fuels are being reduced and the distance from the feature(s) at risk.
*
Water Quality/Quantity
Not applicable.
Describe how the project has the potential to improve water quality and/or increase water quantity, both over the short and long term. Address run-off, erosion, soil infiltration, and flooding, if applicable.
*
Compliance
Archaeology survey will be completed in-house by DWR. Included $2,000 in-kind for cultural resource inventory. No NEPA wil be required for the fish barrier on private property. The rotenone treatment is covered under the EA completed by the USFWS and UDWR in 2012.
Description of efforts, both completed and planned, to bring the proposed action into compliance with any and all cultural resource, NEPA, ESA, etc. requirements. If compliance is not required enter "not applicable" and explain why not it is not required.
*
Methods
The lower pond dam will be notched to drain the pond. The creek will be temporarily piped around or through the pond area. The pond will be dredged and deepened by UintaLands. They have a bulldozer, backhoe, and access to a D8 for the dredging and dirt work. Useable fill will be placed on top of the dam or the road adjacent the pond. This will increase the freeboard of the dam from the current 1 foot to about 3 feet to protect theses structures from times of high flows. Dam materials must be placed and compacted to meet specifications. A geotechnical contractor will test materials and compaction before and during the dam reconstruction process. Dredged fill not meeting specifications for the dam or road will be spread on adjacent vegetated areas. A riser outlet structure will be installed in about the center of the dam. A concrete foundation will be poured for the structure. The riser and outlet pipe from it will be about 30" diameter and capable of passing a 50-year flow. Low density concrete will be poured along the outlet pipe to prevent water movement from the pond along this route. A gangway will be installed for access to operate and maintain the riser structure. An auxiliary spillway structure consisting of a concrete weir and apron leading to rock rubble will be installed in the northeast corner of the pond. A concrete spillway structure will be constructed on the upper pond to prevent dam erosion and failure. The UDWR will conduct the rotenone treatment on about 3 miles of fish bearing water upstream of the lower pond. Following the treatment, the lower pond will be filled. A second treatment will occur in 2020.
Describe the actions, activities, tasks to be implemented as part of the proposed project; how these activities will be carried out, equipment to be used, when, and by whom.
*
Monitoring
Post-project: the UDWR will complete surveys of the ponds for Northern Leatherside Chubs (NLC) and Boreal Toads. Electrofishing of the stream length upstream of the ponds to the upstream extent of fish bearing water will also be completed to assess Brook Trout removal and BCT distribution. These surveys and monitoring efforts will be disseminated in UDWR's annual Northern Region aquatic monitoring reports. TU will monitor the fish barrier and outlets on the two ponds to assess passage of high stream flows and impassability to non-native fishes downstream.
Describe plans to monitor for project success and achievement of stated objectives. Include details on type of monitoring (vegetation, wildlife, etc.), schedule, assignments and how the results of these monitoring efforts will be reported and/or uploaded to this project page. If needed, upload detailed plans in the "attachments" section.
*
Partners
Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, UintaLands, Trout Unlimited, Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest
List any and all partners (agencies, organizations, NGO's, private landowners) that support the proposal and/or have been contacted and included in the planning and design of the proposed project. Describe efforts to gather input and include these agencies, landowners, permitees, sportsman groups, researchers, etc. that may be interested/affected by the proposed project. Partners do not have to provide funding or in-kind services to a project to be listed.
*
Future Management
Deadman Creek is currently managed by UDWR and the UWC for native fishes and Boreal Toads and will continue as such with this project. Monitoring for all three species is part of UDWR's regular aquatic monitoring program. Adaptive management will be implemented dependent upon findings of surveys and monitoring efforts.
Detail future methods or techniques (including administrative actions) that will be implemented to help in accomplishing the stated objectives and to insure the long term success/stability of the proposed project. This may include: post-treatment grazing rest and/or management plans/changes, wildlife herd/species management plan changes, ranch plans, conservation easements or other permanent protection plans, resource management plans, forest plans, etc.
*
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources
Not applicable.
Potential for the proposed action to improve quality or quantity of sustainable uses such as grazing, timber harvest, biomass utilization, recreation, etc. Grazing improvements may include actions to improve forage availability and/or distribution of livestock.
Title Page
Project Details
Finance
Species
Habitats
Seed
Comments
Images/Documents
Completion Form
Project Summary Report