Skip to Content
Main Menu
Search
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Projects
Maps
About Us
Register
Login
Search
Saving...
Thank you for requesting access to WRI.
An administrator will contact you with further details.
Sevier plateau guzzlers
Region: Southern
ID: 5722
Project Status: Completed
Map This Project
Export Project Data
Project Details
*
Need for Project
During the last 20 years several water developments have occurred on Mt. Dutton herd unit in response to vegetation projects. Recent vegetation management projects have improved wildlife forage capacity and improved overall habitat effectiveness by removing encroaching conifers from the ecosystem. Water is still one of the limiting factors on this unit. Several water sources (guzzlers) have been planned to be placed where they can be utilized with existing tree cover while providing access to the treatment area. As demand for water use has increased all over the Great Basin, water sources for wildlife have decreased. There is a need to increase water availability across rangelands for both livestock and wildlife needs. The purpose of the proposed guzzlers is to provide a dedicated source of water for wildlife, improving suitability, and reducing competition between resources for water. Providing a secure water source for wildlife reduces stress on populations and provides for the necessary habitat security for consistent use of the habitat. Distributing wildlife across the landscape helps reduce the risk of disease transmission in localized populations.
Provide evidence about the nature of the problem and the need to address it. Identify the significance of the problem using a variety of data sources. For example, if a habitat restoration project is being proposed to benefit greater sage-grouse, describe the existing plant community characteristics that limit habitat value for greater sage-grouse and identify the changes needed for habitat improvement.
*
Objectives
The water developments will consist of guzzlers designed for rain water collection and storage in holding tanks up to 2,500 gallons. Water will be dispersed through a drinker designed for wildlife use. The objectives are to disperse water in drier habitat areas where it can facilitate better use of the existing habitat.
Provide an overall goal for the project and then provide clear, specific and measurable objectives (outcomes) to be accomplished by the proposed actions. If possible, tie to one or more of the public benefits UWRI is providing.
*
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?)
As local wildlife populations expand so does the human interaction within surrounding habitats. As humans interact and disturb existing populations wildlife become pushed into less desirable locations or into locations that lack all of the necessary resources such as water. In other cases where habitat is improved and forage capacities are returned to better conditions more wildlife can be supported if the critical resources such as water are also available. Guzzlers frequently fill this niche and help offset some of the pressures from disturbance or help facilitate better use of new forage. Placing guzzlers in these drier sites helps facilitate the use by wildlife in these areas where habitat effectiveness is normally limited. In most cases the water will support many sensitive species as well as big-game populations. Many of the existing guzzlers sites are currently providing water to at-risk species such as sage grouse. In all areas, monitoring shows that drinkers provide water for a variety of non-game animals, birds, bats, and large animals.
LOCATION: Justify the proposed location of this project over other areas, include publicly scrutinized planning/recovery documents that list this area as a priority, remote sensing modeling that show this area is a good candidate for restoration, wildlife migration information and other data that help justify this project's location.
TIMING: Justify why this project should be implemented at this time. For example, Is the project area at risk of crossing an ecological or other threshold wherein future restoration would become more difficult, cost prohibitive, or even impossible.
*
Relation to Management Plans
The proposed project is consistent with and supported by the following management plans: 1)Conservation Plan for Greater Sage-Grouse in Utah - Feb 14, 2013. pp. 4 Objective 2.0.3 Habitat: Enhance anaverage of 25,000 acres of sage-grouse habitat in Sage-grouse Management Areas annually. (Water Development will enhance the birds habitat) 2) Dixie National Forest - Land and Resource Management plan - pp. IV-84, Standard: A. Maintain habitatcapability at a level at least 80 % of potential capability for all emphasized species. And. pp. IV-112, 6A management direction, (1) Maintain and manage forested inclusions to provide a high level of forageproduction, wildlife habitat, and diversity. 5) Conservation Plan for Greater Sage Grouse in Garfield County, Adopted January 27, 2014. pp. 6: 2.0.2 Objective 2 - Habitat: Enhance 500 acres of sage-grouse priority habitat on federal lands annually throughconservation efforts evaluated by the NRCS Sage Grouse Habitat Evaluation criteria, with emphasis on areas ofpriority habitat. 2.0.3 Objective 3 - Habitat: Enhance an average of 1,000 acres of sage-grouse habitat on federal lands in Sage-grouse Management Areas annually. 2.0.4 Objective 4 - Habitat: Increase the total amount of sage-grouse habitat acreage within Sage-grouse Management Areas by an average of 500 acres per year, through management actions targeting Opportunity Areas. 6) Garfield County current desired future conditions and Draft resource management plan. pp. 5 Wildlife Goal: Prior to December 31, 2025, land managers will seek to have habitats supporting important fish and wildlife species. 7) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Utah Prairie Dog Recovery Plan. pp.79, (2.3.1) Plan and implement vegetation treatments in strategic locations (including translocation sites) that benefit Utah Prairie Dogs and their habitat. 8) Utah Statewide Elk Management Plan pp. 16, Strategies: C. Watershed Restoration Initiative, a) Increase forage production by annually treating a minimum of 40,000 acres of elk habitat. and b) Coordinate with land management agencies, conservation organizations, private landowners, and local leaders through the regional WRI working groups to identify and prioritize elk habitats in need of enhancement or restoration. 9)Greater Plateau Elk Complex, Elk management plan, (24 Mt. Dutton): pp.4 Range Improvements: Maintain and/or enhance forage production on elk summer and winter range throughout the units. Coordinate with the USFS, SITLA, BLM and private land owners to complete projects designed to improve forage production for both elk and livestock and to improve elk distribution across the unit. Identify higher elevation habitat projects that would encourage elk to winter higher and potentially away from traditional deer wintering areas. (Water development will spread out elk distribution and utilization). 10) Utah Mule Deer Statewide management plan, Dec 01 2014. pp.18 - Habitat Goal: Conserve, improve, and restore mule deer habitat throughout the state with emphasis on crucial ranges. Habitat Objective 1: Maintain mule deer habitat throughout the state by protecting and enhancing existing crucial habitats and mitigating for losses due to natural and human impacts. Strategies: c. Work with local, state and federal land management agencies via land managementplans and with private landowners to identify and properly manage crucial mule deerhabitats, especially fawning, wintering and migration areas. D. Minimize impacts and recommend mitigation for losses of crucial habitat due to human impacts. Habitat Objective 2: Improve the quality and quantity of vegetation for mule deer on a minimum of 500,000 acres of crucial range by 2019. e. Continue to support and provide leadership for the Utah Watershed Restoration Initiative, which emphasizes improving sagebrush-steppe, aspen, and riparian habitats throughout Utah. g. Encourage land managers to manage portions of pinion-juniper woodlands and aspen/conifer forests in early successional stages using various methods including timber harvest and managed fire. 11)DEER HERD UNIT MANAGEMENT PLAN, Deer Herd Unit # 24, (Mt. Dutton), February 2015: Maintain or enhance forage production through direct range improvements on winter and summer deer range throughout the unit to achieve population management objectives. In addition, these water development sites are consistent with the Dixie National Forest Land and Resource Management plan.
List management plans where this project will address an objective or strategy in the plan. Describe how the project area overlaps the objective or strategy in the plan and the relevance of the project to the successful implementation of those plans. It is best to provide this information in a list format with the description immediately following the plan objective or strategy.
*
Fire/Fuels
Guzzlers will help wildlife better utilize existing habitat types. In some areas fuels are increased because wildlife and livestock do not have access to the forage due to the lack of water availability in the area. The placement of guzzlers into these types of areas will help reduce fuels as wildlife better utilize the existing forage.
If applicable, detail how the proposed project will significantly reduce the risk of fuel loading and/or continuity of hazardous fuels including the use of fire-wise species in re-seeding operations. Describe the value of any features being protected by reducing the risk of fire. Values may include; communities at risk, permanent infrastructure, municipal watersheds, campgrounds, critical wildlife habitat, etc. Include the size of the area where fuels are being reduced and the distance from the feature(s) at risk.
*
Water Quality/Quantity
Adding guzzlers to existing habitat helps improve water quality by distributing wildlife across the landscape. Large game animals such as elk and mule deer may concentrate on a single water resource when water is scarce. Additional water sources such as guzzlers and ponds help distribute wildlife across the landscape which allows them to better utilize the existing forage but also alleviates impacts from concentration areas.
Describe how the project has the potential to improve water quality and/or increase water quantity, both over the short and long term. Address run-off, erosion, soil infiltration, and flooding, if applicable.
*
Compliance
NEPA has been conducted and a Decision Memo was issued in the Fall of 2017 approving the placement of these guzzlers on National Forest System lands. All sites have had Archaeological and cultural clearances. Utah law allows for construction of guzzlers under 2500 gallon capacity with a simple rain water harvesting permit, without a water right. Guzzlers were approved up to 2,500 gallon capacity to be consistent with Utah state law. https://www.waterrights.utah.gov/forms/rainwater.asp
Description of efforts, both completed and planned, to bring the proposed action into compliance with any and all cultural resource, NEPA, ESA, etc. requirements. If compliance is not required enter "not applicable" and explain why not it is not required.
*
Methods
Dixie National Forest biologist prefer to utilize galvanized umbrella style tank guzzlers due to their low maintenance needs and ease of installation. It is proposed to purchase (2) tank style guzzlers and transport them from the manufacturer to Panguitch Utah where they will be distributed from there to various sites.
Describe the actions, activities, tasks to be implemented as part of the proposed project; how these activities will be carried out, equipment to be used, when, and by whom.
*
Monitoring
Guzzlers are monitored annually by USFS biologist for maintenance needs. Utilization is monitored with remote trail cameras. Some of the galvanized umbrella tank style guzzlers on the Dixie National Forest have been functional now for over 30+ years. We expect a similar life from the tanks that are proposed.
Describe plans to monitor for project success and achievement of stated objectives. Include details on type of monitoring (vegetation, wildlife, etc.), schedule, assignments and how the results of these monitoring efforts will be reported and/or uploaded to this project page. If needed, upload detailed plans in the "attachments" section.
*
Partners
Partners include Dedicated Hunters, Friends of the Paunsaugunt (Mule deer working group), Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, Local Sportsmens for Fish and Wildlife groups, Mule Deer Foundation, and National Wild Turkey Federation, and Boy Scouts of America. In the past, proposed projects have generated interest from local youth as a Eagle scout projects.
List any and all partners (agencies, organizations, NGO's, private landowners) that support the proposal and/or have been contacted and included in the planning and design of the proposed project. Describe efforts to gather input and include these agencies, landowners, permitees, sportsman groups, researchers, etc. that may be interested/affected by the proposed project. Partners do not have to provide funding or in-kind services to a project to be listed.
*
Future Management
Future management includes constant monitoring to ensure drinkers stay functional and are maintained annually. Biologist monitor existing sites now and conduct maintenance when necessary. In addition, there are 4 other approved sites on the Dixie National Forest, Powell Ranger District that we will be seeking additional funding for in the future.
Detail future methods or techniques (including administrative actions) that will be implemented to help in accomplishing the stated objectives and to insure the long term success/stability of the proposed project. This may include: post-treatment grazing rest and/or management plans/changes, wildlife herd/species management plan changes, ranch plans, conservation easements or other permanent protection plans, resource management plans, forest plans, etc.
*
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources
Livestock benefit from the placement of these guzzlers as most sites will have an overflow into a pond or reservoir that facilitates livestock use. Excess rainwater harvested then allows for livestock to better utilize the surrounding forage.
Potential for the proposed action to improve quality or quantity of sustainable uses such as grazing, timber harvest, biomass utilization, recreation, etc. Grazing improvements may include actions to improve forage availability and/or distribution of livestock.
Title Page
Project Details
Finance
Species
Habitats
Seed
Comments
Images/Documents
Completion Form
Project Summary Report