Project Details

Utah has one of the nation's strongest community fisheries program with 61 waters spread throughout the state.  This network of waters provides close, convenient and safe spaces for anglers of all abilities to fish and are among the most heavily used waters in the state on a per-acre basis.  A recent survey observed that 20% of Utah's 489K licensed anglers used community fisheries (Lillieholm et al. 2017), representing nearly 98K users.  They also represent the majority of the fishing areas in Utah that are accessible for those with limited mobility.  Fishing docks can be a means to get anglers away from shore and into prime fishing areas where their chances of catching a fish increase.  Provide easy access to quality fishing opportunities is consistent with the objectives of the Division of Wildlife and it's municipal partners in the community fishing program and will aid in the recruitment and retainment of new anglers, thereby making a contribution to Utah's continued angling legacy.

Provide evidence about the nature of the problem and the need to address it. Identify the significance of the problem using a variety of data sources. For example, if a habitat restoration project is being proposed to benefit greater sage-grouse, describe the existing plant community characteristics that limit habitat value for greater sage-grouse and identify the changes needed for habitat improvement.

The overall goal is to provide a safe and fun place for people of all ages and abilities to go fishing.  These docks will expand and maintain access to the center of each pond, which fish can show a preference to during the hottest months of the year.

Specifically, we would like to provide one new dock at Steed Pond, which will connect to a path, parking lot and be universally accessible. This will be part of a much larger project by the city that will ultimately include the addition of three new fishing docks, a bridge over the pond, pond aeration, pavilions, a fish cleaning station and walking trails. Most of the project will be paid for by Clearfield City.

At Andy Adams Reservoir, will we would like to refurbish two docks that were repurposed in 2016.  These docks came used from Jordanelle State Park and were already old at the time of install at Andy Adams.  At this time, the dock floats are coming off and absorbing water and need to be replaced.  The pile guides that allow the docks to move up and down with water levels need replaced as well.  With these two items refurbished, each dock should gain at least another decade of useful life, if not more.

At Farr West, project (#6512) came in significantly over budget after a local city contractor was bought by investors and declined to carry out the fabrication and install of the dock at previously estimated price.  Farr West has since gotten quotes from numerous other construction and fabrication companies, with the lowest bid coming in roughly $37,000 over water was previously budgeted.  The piles for the dock have already been installed, so the goal now is to get this large dock completed to provide improved access to the water at this popular pond.

Provide an overall goal for the project and then provide clear, specific and measurable objectives (outcomes) to be accomplished by the proposed actions. If possible, tie to one or more of the public benefits UWRI is providing.

LOCATION: Justify the proposed location of this project over other areas, include publicly scrutinized planning/recovery documents that list this area as a priority, remote sensing modeling that show this area is a good candidate for restoration, wildlife migration information and other data that help justify this project's location.

TIMING: Justify why this project should be implemented at this time. For example, Is the project area at risk of crossing an ecological or other threshold wherein future restoration would become more difficult, cost prohibitive, or even impossible.

List management plans where this project will address an objective or strategy in the plan. Describe how the project area overlaps the objective or strategy in the plan and the relevance of the project to the successful implementation of those plans. It is best to provide this information in a list format with the description immediately following the plan objective or strategy.

If applicable, detail how the proposed project will significantly reduce the risk of fuel loading and/or continuity of hazardous fuels including the use of fire-wise species in re-seeding operations. Describe the value of any features being protected by reducing the risk of fire. Values may include; communities at risk, permanent infrastructure, municipal watersheds, campgrounds, critical wildlife habitat, etc. Include the size of the area where fuels are being reduced and the distance from the feature(s) at risk.

Describe how the project has the potential to improve water quality and/or increase water quantity, both over the short and long term. Address run-off, erosion, soil infiltration, and flooding, if applicable.

Description of efforts, both completed and planned, to bring the proposed action into compliance with any and all cultural resource, NEPA, ESA, etc. requirements. If compliance is not required enter "not applicable" and explain why not it is not required.

Describe the actions, activities, tasks to be implemented as part of the proposed project; how these activities will be carried out, equipment to be used, when, and by whom.

Describe plans to monitor for project success and achievement of stated objectives. Include details on type of monitoring (vegetation, wildlife, etc.), schedule, assignments and how the results of these monitoring efforts will be reported and/or uploaded to this project page. If needed, upload detailed plans in the "attachments" section.

List any and all partners (agencies, organizations, NGO's, private landowners) that support the proposal and/or have been contacted and included in the planning and design of the proposed project. Describe efforts to gather input and include these agencies, landowners, permitees, sportsman groups, researchers, etc. that may be interested/affected by the proposed project. Partners do not have to provide funding or in-kind services to a project to be listed.

Detail future methods or techniques (including administrative actions) that will be implemented to help in accomplishing the stated objectives and to insure the long term success/stability of the proposed project. This may include: post-treatment grazing rest and/or management plans/changes, wildlife herd/species management plan changes, ranch plans, conservation easements or other permanent protection plans, resource management plans, forest plans, etc.

Potential for the proposed action to improve quality or quantity of sustainable uses such as grazing, timber harvest, biomass utilization, recreation, etc. Grazing improvements may include actions to improve forage availability and/or distribution of livestock.