Project Details

The Parowan Front  project area is dominated by stands of pinyon and juniper trees with a high percentage of young trees encroaching areas of remaining sagebrush, bitterbrush, cliffrose, and other deciduous shrubs causing a downward trend in herbaceous cover. The project area serves as an important winter and transition range for mule deer. The I-15 corridor severly diminishes the amount of winter range accessible to the Panguitch Lake deer herd (unit 28). This project will help address these limiting factors by improving and adding critical high quality transitional and winter range for mule deer and other sage brush steppe species. The Panguitch Lake (unit 28) deer herd is currently above objective. The main limiting factor being winter range (doe tags and expensive re-location projects are being used to address this problem). This treatment will help to expand critical high quality habitat, and in return will help bring mule deer populations within  healthy carrying capacities for long term improvements in rangeland health. Accordingly, the Parowan Front Wildlife Management Plan states" due to the extent of the encroachment an aggressive thinning policy is to be carried out on the Parowan Front WMA's to improve habitat for wintering deer." Habitat improvement is important to minimize wildlife depredation on surrounding agricultural lands and to counteract the loss of habitat in surrounding areas due to development. Impacts to the plant communities caused by high concentration of wintering mule deer can be observed, sagebrush shows extremely high use and in turn is leading to a decrease in frequency due to mortality of the plants. Also of note is the prevalent hedging of the juniper trees.

In December 2018, 50 radio collars were deployed on mule deer wintering along the Parowan Front to provide insight on mule deer movement on this limited winter range.  This project will assist in the evaluation of the immediate impacts to wintering mule deer in relation to habitat restoration efforts.  The implementation of this project will provide a unique opportunity to acquire movement data associated with treatments prior to, during, and after implementation.

Provide evidence about the nature of the problem and the need to address it. Identify the significance of the problem using a variety of data sources. For example, if a habitat restoration project is being proposed to benefit greater sage-grouse, describe the existing plant community characteristics that limit habitat value for greater sage-grouse and identify the changes needed for habitat improvement.

The overall goals for the project are: restore the sage steppe ecosystem; restore and enhance riparian systems and water quality, and improve big game habitat on public lands. Specifically, the goals are to remove 90% or more of pinyon and juniper trees in the project area while leaving islands of trees in a mosaic pattern for use by mule deer as thermal cover; re-establish perennial grass, forbs and shrubs to as close to ESD percentages as possible by re-seeding the treatment area with a seed mix that resembles the ESD plant community. In projects similar to this we have seen an increase in the forage of up to 500-800% and we would expect similar increases in this project; decrease hazardous fuels and the threat of catastrophic fire, by masticating the fuels within the treatment area; and reduce erosion potential and sediment in to the Cedar Valley and Little Salt Lake Valley, by removing invasive pinyon an juniper trees from the riparian corridor, as well as the uplands and drainage basins allowing the riparian habitat to re-establish and function to reduce erosion and sedimentation events and keep the water temperatures down.

Provide an overall goal for the project and then provide clear, specific and measurable objectives (outcomes) to be accomplished by the proposed actions. If possible, tie to one or more of the public benefits UWRI is providing.

The invasion of pinyon and juniper trees into areas once dominated by grasses, forbs, and shrubs has lowered the carrying capacity for wintering mule deer. Not completing this project we risk mule deer herds being forced to compete for browse and forage on an already crowded winter range, thus decreasing the carrying capacity of the winter and transition range even further.

The increase of pinyon and juniper also increases the risk for catastrophic wildfires in these habitats, resulting in the complete or partial loss of current winter range and likely conversion to non -native (ie cheatgrass) systems detrimental to other wildlife species (eg. threat to FEHA from non-native plant establishment).

Pinyon and Juniper expansion has also resulted in loss of foraging areas for raptors such as Ferruginous hawk due to the continuous canopy.  Opening up foraging spaces in this canopy while retaining clumps of trees with large flat-topped juniper for raptor perches and nesting is synchronous with the design feature of retaining patches of thermal and hiding cover for wintering big game.

A past project identical to (Private land mastication adjacent) the proposed project has proven successful in meeting these objectives. 
As with any surface disturbing activity in a sagebrush steppe ecosystem there is a low potential for weed invasion. BLM/DWR will aggressively treat any noxious weeds within the treatment area if found.

LOCATION: Justify the proposed location of this project over other areas, include publicly scrutinized planning/recovery documents that list this area as a priority, remote sensing modeling that show this area is a good candidate for restoration, wildlife migration information and other data that help justify this project's location.

TIMING: Justify why this project should be implemented at this time. For example, Is the project area at risk of crossing an ecological or other threshold wherein future restoration would become more difficult, cost prohibitive, or even impossible.

Utah Mule Deer Statewide Management plan (2014)
Habitat Goal: Conserve, improve, and restore mule deer habitat throughout the state with emphasis on crucial ranges.

Panguitch lake Deer Herd Unit Mangement Plan (#28) 2015
The mid elevation upland site supports a pinyon-Utah juniper community and is generally considered to be in very poor condition for deer winter range. This community is prone to infilling from pinyon-juniper trees which can reduce understory shrub and herbaceous cover if not addressed. It is recommended that work to reduce the pinyon-juniper cover (e.g. bullhog, chaining, lop and scatter, etc.) should continue in this plant community.
Parowon Front Wildlifre management plan
All of the units on the Parowan Front WMA have pinyon-juniper forests that are encroaching on the sagebrush flats and choking out many of the browse species important to wintering deer. Several thinning (lop and scatter) and chaining projects have been done in the past to remedy this problem. However, due to the extent of the encroachment an aggressive thinning policy needs to be carried out on the Parowan Front WMA to improve habitat for wintering deer.
Southern Utah Support Area Fire Mangement Plan 2004 which states: Mechanicallly treat to convert pinyon and juniper invasion (condition class 3) into sagebrush/perennial grass (condition class 1 or 2) vegetation types. .
Utah's Standards and Guidelines for Rangeland Health which address watersheds, ecological condition, water quality and habitat for special status species
National Fire Plan (2000)
Healthy Forest Restoration Act of 2003 which state protecting forests, woodlands, shrub lands, and grasslands from unnaturally intensive and destructives fires 
Utah Wildlife conservation Strategy (2005)

Iron County Deer Winter Range Resource Plan (2011)
Protect and expand deer winter range and associated wildlife habitats.

State of Utah Resource Management Plan (2018)
The state supports the efforts of the Utah Watershed Restoration Initiative and other rehabilitative efforts throughout the state
The state supports the Watershed Restoration Initiative to encourage reduced wildfire acreage, reduced soil loss from erosion, reduced sedimentation and storage loss in reservoirs, and improved water quality. 
The state plan supports active management to improve and enhance riparian resources to provide for appropriate physical, biological and chemical function.
engage with federal land management agencies to support active management of healthy riparian areas on federal land.
Seeding an optimal mix of native and desirable non-native species to support desired ecologic conditions and create a properly functioning ecosystem. 
Actively remove pinyon-juniper encroachment in other ecological sites due to its substantial consumption of water and its detrimental effect on sagebrush, other vegetation and wildlife. 
Use of the good neighbor program to partner with Federal Agencies to better manage forage.

Iron County Resource Management Plan (2017)
This plan supports our project in the following ways;
Encouraging the BLM in managing rangelands "in a manner that will protect the quality of scientific, scenic, historical, ecological, environmental, air and atmospheric, water resource, and archeological values, while providing for outdoor recreation, food and habitat for fish, wildlife, and domestic animals.
By stating that it supports management of rangelands and forestlands to enhance desired plant communities that benefit watersheds, wildlife, water quality, recreation, and sustainable livestock grazing.
By encouraging multiple-use as custom and culture on current and future federal land projects. 
By encouraging protection of watershed from the threats of catastrophic wildfire through proper management of forests, and the reduction of fuel loads to prevent and minimize wildfires and their effects and whenever re-seeding needs to occure re-seeding with certified weed-free seed.
By stating that riparian areas should be managed to protect vegetation characteristics. Conservation efforts include preserving existing riparian areas as well as restoring damaged ones. Preservation should also include the dedication of sufficient water and groundwater to support vegetation.
By supporting range improvement projects in crucial deer winter ranges to sustain viable huntable populations, limiting off-road travel of vehicles in crucial deer winter ranges, and efforts to expand deer wintering ranges in the county.

List management plans where this project will address an objective or strategy in the plan. Describe how the project area overlaps the objective or strategy in the plan and the relevance of the project to the successful implementation of those plans. It is best to provide this information in a list format with the description immediately following the plan objective or strategy.

The majority of the area is at moderate to extreme on the fire risk index. There is a large fuel load build up along the Parowan Front and an alteration in fuel types. Pinyon and juniper trees have expanded and moved into areas once dominated by shrubs, forbs, and grasses. Without this project, fuel conditions are such that a wildfire may be difficult to contain, leading to an increased risk to firefighter and public safety, suppression effectiveness and natural resource degradation. Fire Regime Condition Class within the project areas is predominately FRCC 3 which is where fire regimes have been extensiviely altered and risk of losing key ecosystem components from fire is high. Treatments identified within this proposal, including seeding with more fire resistant vegetation, would help reduce hazardous fuel loads, create fuel breaks, and reduce the overall threat of a catastrophic wildfire which could impact the communities of Cedar City, Summit and outlying residential properties and infrastructure. Treatments in and around the sagebrush areas would break up continuous fuels and reduce the risk of wildfire entering these sensitive areas. Removing pinyon and juniper in a mosaic pattern would also break up continuous fuels and reduce the risk of a high intensity wildfire. Because there is a geater risk of conversion of shrublands to annual grasslands under a high intensity fire, managed, pro-active treatments proposed would reduce the likelihood of cheatgrass invasion and help perennial grasses and forbs persist long-term.

If applicable, detail how the proposed project will significantly reduce the risk of fuel loading and/or continuity of hazardous fuels including the use of fire-wise species in re-seeding operations. Describe the value of any features being protected by reducing the risk of fire. Values may include; communities at risk, permanent infrastructure, municipal watersheds, campgrounds, critical wildlife habitat, etc. Include the size of the area where fuels are being reduced and the distance from the feature(s) at risk.

In the mastication process much of the bare soil will be covered by small pieces of woody debris which will aid in the establishment of vegetative cover, which will reduce water runoff and decrease soil erosion into Cedar Valley and Little Salt Lake Valley. Implementation of this project will also greatly increase water infiltration into the soil, recharging groundwater systems in the area.
 Recent research Roundy, et. al.(2014) has shown that mechanical treatments to remove pinyon and juniper increase time that soil water is available. Even four years after treatment, treated areas showed from 8.6 days to 18 days additional water availability at high elevation sites. Additional research by Young, et. al. (2013) also showed a relationship between tree removal and soil climates and wet days on these sites, which while providing more available moisture for desired vegetation could also provide moisture for weeds. Numerous studies have shown that increased infiltration rates and less overland flow improve both water quality and quantity.
We believe that by implementing this project in the drainage basin that feeds Braffits Creek that we will increase the amount of water that makes it to the stream bed. We anticipate that this will result in an increase in the amount of flow in the stream as well as how far the stream flows. We also expect that this will result in stream flow durations that will take sections of the stream from current conditions of intermittent flow and change them over to perennial flow. By changing the flow regimes in these areas we also feel like this will allow for the riparian vegetation along the channel to expand and infill and create a healthy functioning stream. If this infilling in the riparian areas does not happen on its own and there is water and hydric soils suitable to sustain the plant communities then we will come back and manually add the plants that we would like to see along the stream, with a future project proposal.

Describe how the project has the potential to improve water quality and/or increase water quantity, both over the short and long term. Address run-off, erosion, soil infiltration, and flooding, if applicable.

Description of efforts, both completed and planned, to bring the proposed action into compliance with any and all cultural resource, NEPA, ESA, etc. requirements. If compliance is not required enter "not applicable" and explain why not it is not required.

Describe the actions, activities, tasks to be implemented as part of the proposed project; how these activities will be carried out, equipment to be used, when, and by whom.

There are two long term range trend study sites adjacent to the proposed project boundaries. These plots will continue to be read in the future and used to monitor treatment response.  Photopoints will be established throughout the project, before and after pictures. UDWR Habitat and Wildlife biologists will establish a monitoring site within the treatment area that will monitor pellet counts for utilization as well as point intercept plots that will monitor establishment and overall health of the plant community. This will not be an established plot that is read by the DWR Range Trend Crew. This plot will be read annually in the spring by DWR habitat and wildlife biologists after winter utilization has taken place to determine rangeland health and carrying capacity on WMA properties, and should correlate closely to surrounding treatment areas on BLM, and Private Land.

Radio telemetry data from wintering mule deer will be used in the evaluation of this project.  The data will also be used to identify future treatments that may provide valuable stopover habitat during migratory movements.

Pre and post monitoring of flows, on Braffits Creek and potentially other perennial streams within and adjacent to the project area will take place to ascertain the benefits of the project.  PFC will also continue to be conducted on the perennial streams within and adjacent to the project area.

Describe plans to monitor for project success and achievement of stated objectives. Include details on type of monitoring (vegetation, wildlife, etc.), schedule, assignments and how the results of these monitoring efforts will be reported and/or uploaded to this project page. If needed, upload detailed plans in the "attachments" section.

Spring 2017 BLM was approached by the Division of Wildlife Resources and the NRCS with the idea of doing some land restoration treatments along the Parowan Front to restore and enhance winter mule deer range. This project entails 690 acres of BLM, 117 acres of SITLA, 847 acres of WMA, and 35 acres of Private. The Division of Wildlife has been heavily involved in the layout and planning process of this project, because much of it involves land they manage directly. During the planning stages we also consulted with Great Basin Research Center on appropriate plant species to use in the seed mix. Private landowners were contacted and are excited and involved in creating and implementing this project as well. The Private land that is being treated is land that will connect some previously treated areas to the areas that this project will be treating and make them one contiguous treatment area. This private landowner is also contributing to the project by allowing us to access the upper elevation treatment areas through his private property and road systems.

List any and all partners (agencies, organizations, NGO's, private landowners) that support the proposal and/or have been contacted and included in the planning and design of the proposed project. Describe efforts to gather input and include these agencies, landowners, permitees, sportsman groups, researchers, etc. that may be interested/affected by the proposed project. Partners do not have to provide funding or in-kind services to a project to be listed.

The BLM portion of this project falls within two authorized livestock (cattle) grazing allotments within the treatment area; Fiddlers Canyon and Webster Hill. Fiddlers Canyon is divided into 6 pastures that are grazed from 10/01-6/30 on a deferred rest rotation. A portion of this project will be in Pasture 3&4 where grazing occurs in the spring (either 4/15-5/31, 05/15-6/30 or rest.) Webster Hill is divided into two pastures that are grazed from 05/01-06/15. All areas seeded will be rested for a minimum of two growing seasons to ensure adequate rest and seedling establishment. This rest will be assured through a signed document (Grazing AOI) from the grazing permittee and the BLM. Vegetation will continue to be monitored for utilization, cover and trend. Future maintenance projects to protect investments made by UWRI/BLM have been addressed and allowed through the project planning document (NEPA) planning process to allow other methods in the future. 
Parowan Front WMA's will be managed primarily for the benefit of wildlife. Grazing of cattle will be used on the WMA properties to reduce grasses and promote the growth of browse if deemed necessary by habitat management staff. Grazing will only be administered through a high intensity short-term period strategy, from early may to early June. Regional UDWR personnel will evaluate each unit for habitat quality on a yearly basis. At that time it will be decided what units, if any will be grazed by livestock (primarily cattle) the following year.

Detail future methods or techniques (including administrative actions) that will be implemented to help in accomplishing the stated objectives and to insure the long term success/stability of the proposed project. This may include: post-treatment grazing rest and/or management plans/changes, wildlife herd/species management plan changes, ranch plans, conservation easements or other permanent protection plans, resource management plans, forest plans, etc.

Rangeland conditions are expected to improve following implementation of the proposed vegetation project. The health, vigor, recruitment and production of perennial grasses, forbs and shrubs would improve which would provide a more palatable and nutritional source of forage for both livestock and wildlife. Implementation of this project would eventually improve overall livestock performance (e.g. increased cow weights, increased calf crops, increased weaning weights, etc) and improve the economic stability of the permittees due to an
increase in the quantity and quality of grasses and other herbaceous forage which are important to livestock grazing.
The private landowners should see increases in available forage, in areas that will be used by livestock.  Thick woodlands typically deter use by livestock, simply because there is easier and more desired areas to feed.  Opening these areas and increasing the amount of forage through planting will allow for livestock to disperse, likely providing relief to other areas that have been utilized historically.

These areas are used extensively for recreation by hunters and wildlife viewers.  They are also popular areas for shed antler gathering.

UDWR issues several firewood permits every year allowing the public to remove firewood from previously treated areas. On BLM administered lands firewood gathering, and cedar post cutting is also permissible and is governed through a permit that can be purchased at the local BLM office.

Potential for the proposed action to improve quality or quantity of sustainable uses such as grazing, timber harvest, biomass utilization, recreation, etc. Grazing improvements may include actions to improve forage availability and/or distribution of livestock.