Skip to Content
Main Menu
Search
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative
Projects
Maps
About Us
Register
Login
Search
Saving...
Thank you for requesting access to WRI.
An administrator will contact you with further details.
Smith Park and Green Ponds Fishing Docks
Region: Northern
ID: 6512
Project Status: Current
Map This Project
Export Project Data
Project Details
*
Need for Project
Utah has one of the nation's strongest community fisheries program with 59 waters spread throughout the state. This network of waters provides close, convenient and safe spaces for anglers of all abilities to fish and are among the most heavily used waters in the state on a per-acre basis. A recent survey observed that 20% of Utah's 489K licensed anglers used community fisheries (Lillieholm et al. 2017), representing nearly 98K users. They also represent the majority of the fishing areas in Utah that are accessible for those with limited mobility. Fishing docks can be a means to get anglers away from shore and into prime fishing areas where their chances of catching a fish increase. Provide easy access to quality fishing opportunities is consistent with the objectives of the Division of Wildlife and it's municipal partners in the community fishing program and will aid in the recruitment and retainment of new anglers, thereby making a contribution to Utah's continued angling legacy.
Provide evidence about the nature of the problem and the need to address it. Identify the significance of the problem using a variety of data sources. For example, if a habitat restoration project is being proposed to benefit greater sage-grouse, describe the existing plant community characteristics that limit habitat value for greater sage-grouse and identify the changes needed for habitat improvement.
*
Objectives
The overall goal is to provide a safe and fun place for people of all ages and abilities to go fishing. These docks will expand access to the center of each pond, which fish can show a preference to during the hottest months of the year. Specifically, we would like to provide one fishing dock at Smith Park Pond on the pond's west side (see figure in attachments) and one dock at Green Farm Pond on the pond's north end (see figure and pond layout in attachments).
Provide an overall goal for the project and then provide clear, specific and measurable objectives (outcomes) to be accomplished by the proposed actions. If possible, tie to one or more of the public benefits UWRI is providing.
*
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?)
None. These docks should actually mitigate some risk around each pond, reducing hazards associating with slipping and falling along the bank.
LOCATION: Justify the proposed location of this project over other areas, include publicly scrutinized planning/recovery documents that list this area as a priority, remote sensing modeling that show this area is a good candidate for restoration, wildlife migration information and other data that help justify this project's location.
TIMING: Justify why this project should be implemented at this time. For example, Is the project area at risk of crossing an ecological or other threshold wherein future restoration would become more difficult, cost prohibitive, or even impossible.
*
Relation to Management Plans
This project is consistent with the Utah Division of Wildlife's Strategic Plan, specifically objectives C1 and C6, which call for increasing hunting and fishing opportunities and participation.
List management plans where this project will address an objective or strategy in the plan. Describe how the project area overlaps the objective or strategy in the plan and the relevance of the project to the successful implementation of those plans. It is best to provide this information in a list format with the description immediately following the plan objective or strategy.
*
Fire/Fuels
Not applicable
If applicable, detail how the proposed project will significantly reduce the risk of fuel loading and/or continuity of hazardous fuels including the use of fire-wise species in re-seeding operations. Describe the value of any features being protected by reducing the risk of fire. Values may include; communities at risk, permanent infrastructure, municipal watersheds, campgrounds, critical wildlife habitat, etc. Include the size of the area where fuels are being reduced and the distance from the feature(s) at risk.
*
Water Quality/Quantity
Not applicable
Describe how the project has the potential to improve water quality and/or increase water quantity, both over the short and long term. Address run-off, erosion, soil infiltration, and flooding, if applicable.
*
Compliance
No archaeological clearance is required for previously disturbed ground, such as these ponds. NEPA is not required either.
Description of efforts, both completed and planned, to bring the proposed action into compliance with any and all cultural resource, NEPA, ESA, etc. requirements. If compliance is not required enter "not applicable" and explain why not it is not required.
*
Methods
aaa
Describe the actions, activities, tasks to be implemented as part of the proposed project; how these activities will be carried out, equipment to be used, when, and by whom.
*
Monitoring
Public use and structural integrity of the dock will be monitored by both cities and DWR Northern Region personnel.
Describe plans to monitor for project success and achievement of stated objectives. Include details on type of monitoring (vegetation, wildlife, etc.), schedule, assignments and how the results of these monitoring efforts will be reported and/or uploaded to this project page. If needed, upload detailed plans in the "attachments" section.
*
Partners
City of Farr West City of West Haven
List any and all partners (agencies, organizations, NGO's, private landowners) that support the proposal and/or have been contacted and included in the planning and design of the proposed project. Describe efforts to gather input and include these agencies, landowners, permitees, sportsman groups, researchers, etc. that may be interested/affected by the proposed project. Partners do not have to provide funding or in-kind services to a project to be listed.
*
Future Management
Each city will be responsible for maintenance of the fishing docks. It is anticipated each fishery may sustain increased use by anglers as a result of the dock. DWR will monitor use of the fisheries and adjust management as necessary.
Detail future methods or techniques (including administrative actions) that will be implemented to help in accomplishing the stated objectives and to insure the long term success/stability of the proposed project. This may include: post-treatment grazing rest and/or management plans/changes, wildlife herd/species management plan changes, ranch plans, conservation easements or other permanent protection plans, resource management plans, forest plans, etc.
*
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources
Docks will be made of steel frames and composite wood (recycled plastic and reused saw dust), which will reduce overall maintenance and improve sustainability compared to traditional wood, which would require annual treatments with a water sealant.
Potential for the proposed action to improve quality or quantity of sustainable uses such as grazing, timber harvest, biomass utilization, recreation, etc. Grazing improvements may include actions to improve forage availability and/or distribution of livestock.
Title Page
Project Details
Finance
Species
Habitats
Seed
Comments
Images/Documents
Completion Form
Project Summary Report